(Login rsterne) Crosman Forum Member 66.244.241.34
If I understand correctly....
August 19 2012, 4:54 PM
The piston is connected rigidly to the valve by the blue rod?.... ie they move as one?.... It certainly looks like it would work to me.... the caveat being the volume available for the shot is just what is inside the valve.... That volume (and pressure) would have to be tailored for the job required....
(Login pneuguy) Crosman Forum Member 74.242.252.204
Correct on all points, Bob. It's not really a serious design...
August 19 2012, 5:07 PM
...but only meant as a response to Rob's implied challenge.
To refine the idea a small step toward practicality, the length of the "valve" would probably need to be adjustable in order to adjust the setpoint pressure.
(Login pneuguy) Crosman Forum Member 74.242.252.204
Well, the Valve closes when the Spring compresses...
August 19 2012, 5:58 PM
...sufficiently to allow the Valve to contact the Seat. Setpoint pressure is defined by the PSI required to develop sufficient Piston Force to balance the associated Spring Force, and that Force is equal to the Spring rate x the difference in length between the Valve and uncompressed Spring.
Therefore the only way to adjust the setpoint pressure, if the Spring (length and rate) and Piston (area) are given, is to change the length of the Valve.
Ron (Login oo7fuzz) Crosman Forum Member 65.29.187.27
Hi Steve
August 19 2012, 10:27 PM
It seems that the spring force will change, say from a 3000psi fill to a draindown of say 2000psi fill, in the amount of 12pf if the conecting rod (or seal area) would be 1/8" dia. since the connecting rod end is exposed to the declining pressure of the reservoir.
Steve in NC (Login pneuguy) Crosman Forum Member 74.242.252.204
You're absolutely right, Ron. The valve seat area needs to be made...
August 19 2012, 11:02 PM
...as small as possible in relation to the piston area, to minimize the "feedthru" of reservoir pressure into the output pressure. This consideration applies, of course to all single-stage regulators.
If, for example, the piston OD were 0.25" and the rod 0.062, the resulting 16:1 area ratio would imply 1psi of output variation for every 16psi change in reservoir pressure.
That's already not horrible, but you could probably do better. For example, since the connection rod is under tension at all times, perhaps music wire would be a better way to go than an actual rod. Assuming again a .25" piston and a 1500psi setpoint, Piston force would be of the order of 67lbs, so wire as small as 1/32" would suffice, suggesting only 1/64 feedthru.
Steve
This message has been edited by pneuguy from IP address 74.242.252.204 on Aug 19, 2012 11:11 PM This message has been edited by pneuguy from IP address 74.242.252.204 on Aug 19, 2012 11:10 PM
dan house (Login dan_house) Crosman Forum Member 71.210.112.11
nuuuuuuewp, not getting it
August 19 2012, 10:28 PM
I'll cop to being wore out and maybe brain dead after a few too many long days, but I dont get it
Wheres the hammer striking? On the stem the green seal is on? If thats true, what opens the gizmo on the left? wheres your air coming from?
I suspect it wont be so mysterious after its explained, but for now....
dr_subsonic's pneumatic research lab
the Lunatic Fringe of American Airgunning
Southwest Montana's headquarters for Airgunning Supremacy
Proud Sponsor of team_subsonic
(Login pneuguy) Crosman Forum Member 74.242.252.204
There's a PCP reservoir on the left, the Spring opens the regulator Valve...
August 19 2012, 11:13 PM
...to admit air from the reservoir into the firing chamber until pressure on the Piston overcomes the Spring and closes the regulator Valve.
The hammer (coming from the right) hits the firing valve stem (connected to the green head) and opens it to fire, just as in a normal unregulated PCP valve.
Steve
This message has been edited by pneuguy from IP address 74.242.252.204 on Aug 19, 2012 11:14 PM
(Login pneuguy) Crosman Forum Member 74.242.252.204
Well, okay. But carp #1: It might tend to get (excessively)...
August 19 2012, 7:20 PM
...up-close and personal with the striker. Other than that, I'm totally on board.
I.e.: I'm not.
Steve
This message has been edited by pneuguy from IP address 74.242.252.204 on Aug 19, 2012 7:23 PM This message has been edited by pneuguy from IP address 74.242.252.204 on Aug 19, 2012 7:22 PM
(Login pneuguy) Crosman Forum Member 74.242.252.204
Thanks, James. I regard praise from Perotti as praise indeed!
August 20 2012, 9:09 AM
It does have a couple of nice features - like not needing a vent hole, since the li'l piston can sniff ambient air in the hammer tube.
It probably has a gotcha' or two that aren't immediately obvious. Nevertheless it (or something similar) may offer a fairly easy way to build regulation into ordinary PCP valves, with a minimum of fuss.