Why Anglo-Saxons are so aggressive?
nasco
Why some nations are extremely aggressive with such strong desire to conquer and to enforce their “culture” or anti-culture on others? Where is this destructive will to power coming from?
Why some other nations, like China, practically never in the history showed such aggressive behavior.
Can you imagine what sort of army China could build and how many foreign countries could have been conquered during many of its dynasties when technologically and culturally it was the strongest nation in the world at that time.
Well instead of doing this China did the opposite. They
invested all their resources to build the greet wall and protect themselves from barbarian invasion to protect their thousand years culture and civilization.
Why could China decide to build their own civilization without conquering and imposing their culture to others?
Why some other nations like Anglo-Saxon nations always have had totally different behavior than the Chinese? Why today’s USA, instead of going around the world killing people, does not save kids in Africa from dying of hunger?
Well, it is not easy but let us try to find rational answers on those questions.
[b]Brief history and character of Anglo-Saxon race[/b]
As genetically cold, rational people, suffering from lack of emotion and compassion, English people always have been perfect ground for developing cruel and inhumane society in different forms through history.
As one isolated island without too much touch with the outside world, England culturally never was part of European continent.
Suppressed and occupied by Roman people in their British islands for centuries, living isolated from the outside world, English people did not have a chance to develop civilized spiritual and cultural life like Continental part of Europe.
Charles Darwin could not accidentally appear in England where he established his theory of evolution which basic principle is that only the strongest species have right to survive.
Although Darwin specifically explained that his theory strictly works in the animal world, the English found that the theory very well suited them and happily applied it first on themselves and later, forcefully on others as so called “ Social Darwinism ”.
This inhumane, uncivilized competitive environment adopted cruelty as a part of every day culture or anti-culture.
Later England became a society with strictly distinctive classes where upper class despised lower class and people of lower class had very little chance to improve their status which more or less remained until today.
Early primitive capitalism brought even more cruelty when for example children as young as seven were forced to work in coal mines and were starved to death.
Victorian period virtually trained the whole nation as an army in order to conquer and enslave other peoples in the world.
At that period it was established practice of training children at early age to control and suppress their emotion in order to become tough and emotionally untouchable.
This practice remains to these days in the majority of Anglo-Saxon countries. As a result of this people became creatures without emotion and compassion as individuals, which makes depression its number one disease in Anglo-Saxon world.
Consequently because of their rational nature Anglo-Saxon people always suffered from lack of moral and spiritual life.
So inhumane society in such circumstances produced enormous number of criminals, very frustrated and extremely aggressive people who could not see any other hope in their lives except to commit crimes, many of them, simply to survive.
To get rid of so large number of criminals England decided to” kill two birds with one stone” and send them as convicts to America, Australia, New Zealand and Canada.
In order to keep their frustration under control English allowed their convicts to kill about 40 million American Indians, 4 million Australian Aborigines and about two million New Zealand Maoris.
This worked only for a while because their genetically motivated hunger for killing started to rise again. English were still very determined to keep their convicts under control and came up to an even greater idea of bringing them millions of black slaves from Africa that thy can have enough people to rape, kill and abuse as much as they wanted.
This, we would say in today’s term “mental treatment”, was very successful for relatively short period of time. But unfortunately in the meantime, the English lost their power and had to leave America because of convict uprising. Very shortly after this black slaves gained freedom.
Later large number of Jewish people colonized America converting Anglo-Saxons in Jewish religion, this religion is “Golden Calf” or as Jesus Christ called it “To serve “Mamon”, a religion that worships gold, materialistic values, profits and so on, (Refer Forum thread “ Who killed Jesus Christ and why”).
This religion has brought a very powerful new Empire as a combination of aggressive Anglo-Saxon rationalism and Jewish pragmatism, that has been terrorizing the world till now.
Genetically motivated convicts desire for enslaving and killing others, now, turned on people outside of USA.
First target were neighboring counters like Porto Rico, then Cuba, Mexico but shortly they expended their predatory ambitions attacking Korea, China then again Cuba, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Serbia, Somalia and again Iraq
And finally, recently, Russian borders have been surrounded by NATO troops.
Australia has practically remained as a British colony (Governor General as a Queen’s representative and has power to sack Australian prime minister) where British managed to keep majority convict Anglo-Saxon population under control manly allowing them to abuse local aboriginal population as much as they want. Similar happened in Canada and New Zealand.
Also the fact that those countries have been less under Jewish influence made them less aggressive towards others than the Americans.
[b]Conclusion[/b]:
[b]Main reason for arrogance[/b]
The main reason for ongoing arrogant behavior of Anglo-Saxon people can be found in their cultural isolation from the rest of the world. In such circumstances they did not have chance to compare themselves with civilized nations (and to learn from them), building unfounded impression about their superiority.
[b]Lack of culture and creativity[/b]
Partly because of their cold rational materialistic nature they were unable to develop their spiritual life as a predisposition for unique culture.
As a result of this they have always been focused on training rather than on education. By doing this, creative ability to develop civilized society was reduced to minimum. Why for example English are conservative? The answer is very simple:
Someone who does not have creative energy to produce something new sticks to something which is already there.
Aggressive nature and desire for conquering others
Acceptance of dogmatic humanism, social Darwinism with cruel competitive environment in function of self-purpose strictly materialistic lives, without genuine sense of compassion of individuals and convict ancestral past produced frustrated spiritually and culturally poor, selfish, aggressive, self destructive and barbaric society like Roman Empire.
This society wants to export its primitive and destructive values without respect for other human beings around the world.
For example they have never understood and adopted Christianity but wanted to convert others to Catholic religion. As Robert Hughes put it: “They want to teach old civilizations about culture”.
[b]Luck of morality[/b]
As the great Russian writer Dostoyevski said: “ If God is dead everything is permitted”.
After demonizing and spreading lies against Serbs as a pretext for bombing Belgrade, a New York Times reporter was asked “ Do you think that is moral to misled the people and not tell the truth” replied:
“I am not paid to be moral, I am paid to do my Job”.
It seems that Dostoyevski was again absolutely right.
|