FICTION.
"The ROMANS under EMPEROR TRAJAN, conquered
DACIA in A.D.106 and made it a province of the ROMAN EMPIRE.
ROMAN soldiers occupied DACIA and ROMAN
colonists settled there.
The ROMANS intermarried with the DACIANS
who adopted ROMAN customs and the LATIN language.
DACIA become known as ROMANIA because of
the roman occupation and influence.
FACT.
WE KNOW FROM ROMAN HISTORY THAT BY 106 A.D.
THE COMMON SOLDIERS OF THE ROMAN LEGIONS WERE
DRAWN FROM ALL PARTS OF THE EMPIRE AND OFTEN
HIRED FROM OUTSIDE.
THUS APART FROM THE USE OF LATIN AS THE
LANGUAGE OF THE COMMAND,THE EVERYDAY LANGUAGE
OF ANY NUMBER OF THE SOLDIERS WAS NOT LATIN.
NOR WERE MOST COLONISTS LATIN SPEAKING,
BECAUSE IT WAS PRECISELY EMPEROR TRAIAN
WHOSE LAW FORBADE THE INHABITANTS OF ITALY
TO MIGRATE TO THE NEW COLONIES, LEST ITALY
BECOME FILLED UP WITH FOREIGNERS.
THE DEFEATED, PROUD DACIANS WERE HARDLY KEEN
ON INTERMARRYING WITH THEIR BRUTAL CONQUERORS.
UNDER SUCH CONDITIONS HOW LIKELY IS IT THAT
IN A MERE 165 YEARS THE AUTOCHTHONOUS DACIAN
POPULATION BECOME A LATIN SPEAKING "DACO-ROMAN"
OR "DACIAN-ROMAN" ONE, WHEN UNDER MUCH MORE
FAVOURABLE CONDITIONS AND AFTER SOME 400 YEARS
OF ROMAN RULE NO LATIN SPEAKING POPULATION WORTH
MENTIONING REMAINED IN BRITAIN?
___________________________________________________________________
FICTION
The very few documents on Transylvania
mention Vlachs first in 1222, as shepherds;
But they appear soon after as settled peasants,
and at this period the Vlach population in
Transylvania, the Banat and Maramures was
certainly considerable and increasing.
FACT
ONE HUNGARIAN DOCUMENT DATED 1210 MENTIONS VLACHS AS
BORDER GUARDS ON THE SOUTHERN TRANSYLVANIAN EDGE OF
THE HUNGARIAN KINGDOM.
IN THE 13TH & 14TH CENTURIES, THE VLACH POPULATION IN
THE HUNGARIAN KINGDOM,ACCORDING TO HUNGARIAN DOCUMENTS,
WAS NEGLIGIBLE IN THE BANAT AND MARAMURES AND IT COULD
NOT POSSIBLY HAVE BEEN SO CONSIDERABLE IN OTHER PARTS
OF WHAT IS NOW KNOWN AS TRANSYLVANIA, EITHER.
FOR AMONG THE 511 VILLAGES WHICH CAN BE ASCERTAINED
FOR THE AREA IN QUESTION BY THE END OF THE 13TH CENTURY,
ONLY THREE WERE RUMANIAN, WHILE NO TOWN WAS EVER FOUNDED
THERE BY THE VLACH/RUMANIANS...
(...AND NO MAJOR WATERWAYS NAMES WERE EVER DERIVED FROM
RUMANIAN ORIGIN...)
___________________________________________________________________
FICTION
..At the end of the 10th century the Hungarians
broke into Transilvania from the Pannonian Plain
and finaly conquered it in the 12th century...
FACT
This is a physical impossibility!
How did the Hungarians got to the Pannonian Plain?
Since we know that the Hungarians came from the East
and before the Pannonian plain there was a big Country
later called Transylvania they had to pass trough to get to the Pannonian Plain.
Transylvania was severely depopulated at the time of the arrival of the Hungarians.(due to 700 years of instability)
The only resistance they encountered was the Bulgarian
occupied southern Transylvania.
They have ended the Bulgarian rule almost the same year
as they arrived.(A.D. 895 AND NOT IN THE 12TH CENTURY)
___________________________________________________________________
FICTION
..In the area of later Transylvania existed the
nucleus of Dacian slave state.
After the Romans conquered this state, the area of
late Transylvania formed part of Provincia Dacia.
During feudal times the main strength of Daco-Roman
population was the village community.
In the course of time such groupings were called "countries".
Thus existed FAGARASULUI COUNTRY, MARAMURESULUI
COUNTRY. HATEGULUI COUNTRY, LAPUSULUI COUNTRY etc....,
FACT
The village communities allegedly turned "countries"
named by him/her bring to light a most interesting information.
- Romanian Fogarasului actually derives from old Hungarian Fogaras "(an area) abounding in partridges"
(cf. Old Hungarian fogor=fogoly "partridge"-s is an
adjectival format; cf. the village name Belenyes
(also in Transylvania) "(an area) abounding in bisons"
were Old Hungarian Beleny=Boleny "bison".
-Marmarosului is a borrowing of old Hungarian Maramaros
the name of a Hungarian county in NE Historical Hungary
from the name of the small river Maramaros which is of
Indo-European origin, meaning "stagnant water"
-Hategului is also a borrowing of Old Hungarian,
now, Hategului, in which toponym -ului is the Romanian
definite article placed after the noun, is clearly the
ROMANISED VERSION OF HUNGARIAN HATSZEG,A COMPOSITE WORD IN WHICH HAT "FAIRLY BROAD BRIDGE", SZEG "CORNER SPIT OF LAND".
-Laposului is a borrowing of old Hungarian Lapos "marshy land" (cf. the ending -s as in Fogaras end Belenyes)
THE ROMANIAN ENDINGS -ULUI ARE SIMPLY ADDED TO THE ORIGINALLY HUNGARIAN TOPONYMS END THAT IS HOW THE ROMANIAN HISTORY CREATED.
THUS,INSTEAD OF PROVING THAT THE LISTED "COUNTRIES"
WERE ROMANIAN CREATIONS PRIOR TO THEIR ALLEGED "CONQUEST" BY THE HUNGARIANS, IT BECOMES CLEAR THAT ALL FOUR "COUNTRIES" WERE HUNGARIAN SETTLEMENT AREA BEFORE
THE WALACHIANS IMMIGRATED INTO TRANSYLVANIA....
BY THE WAY DOES Fogarasului, Marmarosului, Hategului END Laposului MEAN ANYTHING IN ROMANIAN????
|