..that their grief was not a normal response, that their suffering was actually mental illness for which they needed psychiatric labelling and treating?
OF COURSE NOT!
Why? Because it would be so OBVIOUSLY hurtful, insulting, untrue and out of order.
So why won't it be so plainly and obviously meaningless rubbish when it comes to hearing it from a psychiatrist that uses the DSM as a bible?
What is it with the DSM and the Key Opinion Leader psychiatrists that can take away, en masse, all common sense re natural human responses to things going on in life and turn it all into 'believed' psychiatric utter gobbledegook?? How on earth do they do that?