Click Here For
WiredPatrol Site
"You Are a Child of the Universe, No Less than the Trees or the Stars"
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>RETURN TO MESSAGES INDEX  

PLEASE VOTE RE KEEPING THE BLACK BOX WARNING on Antidepressants.

September 6 2007 at 8:38 PM
paula 

THE APA are fighting to get the black box warning repealed, please vote - 2 seconds as you don't have to fill anything in.   You'll need to go to the url to get to voting.

 

http://www.pharmalot.com/2007/09/suicides-rise-as-antidepressant-use-falls/

Suicides Rise As Antidepressant Use Falls?

That’s the conclusion of yet another study in the American Journal of Psychiatry, which finds that teenage suicides rose 14 percent from 2003 to 2004, a year in which the debate that antidepressants actually cause suicide gained widespread publicity. (Here is the abstract).

The data suggest that for every 20 percent decline in antidepressant use among patients of all ages in the United States, an additional 3,040 suicides per year would occur, Robert Gibbons, a professor of biostatistics and psychiatry at the University of Illinois at Chicago, who did the study, tells The Washington Post.

Meanwhile, the CDC today released new data showing the suicide rate for 10- to-24-year-olds increased by 8 percent in 2004, the largest single-year rise in 15 years. The decline took place from 1990 to 2003 (from 9.48 to 6.78 per 100,000 people), and the increase took place from 2003 to 2004, (from 6.78 to 7.32), the report said. Rates rose for 10- to-14-year-old females, 15 -to-19-year-old females and 15- to-19-year-old males.

The FDA held widely publicized meetings on antidepressants and suicide in the fall of 2003, and Black Box warnings were placed in product labeling in early 2004. Gibbons says those warnings led to a broad decline in antidepressant scrips for all patients younger than 60, but prescription rates continued to rise among those older than 60, and his study found this was the only group in which suicides dropped between 2003 and 2004.

“We may have inadvertently created a problem by putting a ‘black box’ warning on medications that were useful,” says Tom Insel, director of the National Institute of Mental Health. “If the drugs were doing more harm than good, then the reduction in prescription rates should mean the risk of suicide should go way down, and it hasn’t gone down at all - it has gone up.”

In June, the same medical journal pubished a study that offered the same conclusion, prompting Tom Laughren, the FDA official who oversees psychiatric drugs, to say that if CDC data for 2005 shows a similar trend, the Black Box warnings may be repealed. This week, he hints at the same possibility: “We will continue to monitor antidepressant use and suicide rates,” he tells the Post, “and will take appropriate regulatory actions as new data become available.”

The journal, by the way, is published by the American Psychiatric Association, which has regularly criticized the Black Box warnings, saying some docs and patients are being scared away from meds that could be helpful.

What should the FDA do about the warnings?

  • Leave the Black Box warnings alone (95%, 142 Votes)
  • Repeal the warnings (5%, 8 Votes)

Total Voters: 150

 

 


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
paula

The FDA are threatening to repeal it. n/t

September 6 2007, 8:39 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   
paula

DrugWonk / CMPI / exFDA / Manning Selvage & Lee - working to remove BlackBox Warning

September 6 2007, 9:12 PM 

Todays DrugWonk entry:

(drugwonks.com)

"What's Really Depressing....

Robert Goldberg

FiercePharma call the increase in suicides in the wake of SSRI fearmongering "unforseen." I love FiercePharma's reporting but I think they are wrong in this instance. Unforseen? About as unforseen as insulin going out of control when you stop using Avandia.

http://www.fiercepharma.com

Given the huge body of evidence that the decline in the use of anti-depressants has fueled an increase in suicides, the fearmongers now blame an increase in the use of anti-psychotics. That includes David Healy, the well-paid expert witness for trial attorneys now suing the likes of Eli Lilly who make...anti-psychotics.

Can we say conflict of interest?

Where will Healy, David Graham and the rest go to wash the blood off their hands? And will the FDA do the right thing and stop handing black boxes out to protect themselves from Senator Grassley and the press? "

 

 

No we can't say that Goldberg.  Can you say "Corrupt Industry Funded Website called DrugWonks run by two CREEP PR GUYS from the FDA, purporting to be working in the public interest"? 

How many thousands of people died so far over the years because the FDA hire and listen to CREEPS like you?

 

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Center_for_Medicine_in_the_Public_Interest

"Funding

On its webiste CMPI states that "PRI solicits and accepts donations from corporations in the health care industry. In order to avoid conflicts of interest, PRI staff and external authors adhere to a Code of Practice." [2]

Ties to Avandia controversy

Following Dr. Steven Nissen's publication of a study warning that "GlaxoSmithKline's diabetes drug Avandia increased the risk of heart attacks by 43% and death from cardiovascular events by possibly 64%," he was publicly pilloried. "More than one story from ostensibly different sources" derisively referred to him as "St Steven," the "Patron Saint of Drug Safety," and "Saint Steven the Pure," reported Evelyn Pringle in an August 2007 CounterPunch article. [3]

Among the Nissen attackers was FDA spokesman Douglas Arbesfeld. Arbesfeld previously worked at the PR firm Manning Selvage & Lee (MS&L), helping Glaxo and other "healthcare clients maximize internet-relations." Former FDA Deputy Commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who ridiculed Nissen in a Wall Street Journal editorial, also consulted for pharmaceutical companies at MS&L. Two more FDA alums, Peter Pitts and Robert Goldberg, mocked Nissen in a Washington Times piece. Pitts is the senior vice-president for global health affairs at MS&L. Goldberg doesn't have ties to the PR firm, but serves with Pitts as an officer of CMPI, which Pringle describes as a "nest of ex-moles who served the industry in one capacity or another in the Bush Administration's FDA." [4]

"...Two more FDA alums, Peter Pitts and Robert Goldberg mocked Nissen in a Washington Times piece. Pitts is the senior vice-president for global health affairs at MS&L. Goldberg doesn't have ties to the PR firm, but serves with Pitts as an officer of CMPI, which Pringle describes as a "nest of ex-moles who served the industry in one capacity or another in the Bush Administration's FDA." [4] ..."

 

YOU are the killers!


 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - PLEASE VOTE RE KEEPING THE BLACK BOX WARNING on Antidepressants.
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>RETURN TO MESSAGES INDEX  


Visit RxISK ORG from Data Based Medicine
'the first free website (not sponsored by big pharma or advertising) for patients
and their doctors to research, and more importantly, easily report drug side effects'.