Home > Discussion Groups > World War I and 1920s + 1930s

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4. From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=282066&messageid=1113823087
Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

 Return to Index  

emhar 1/35 tanks

April 12 2005 at 8:25 AM		   (no login)
from IP address 84.94.60.148
well i know that these questions had been asked for a billion times before, but i'm going to ask them again....
how are emhar's 1/35 tank kits? i'm planning to buy one and i'd like to know which one is the best. i've heard that the mk.4 kits are so-so and that the whippet kit is ok. can someone say exactly what makes them so-so and ok? between the male and female mk.'s kits, which one is most accurate?
thanks.

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. I think OOTB they are poor - david nickels on Apr 12, 12:23 PM
    2.  
  2. one more Time! - gilles Thomas on Apr 12, 2:57 PM
    1. Just fix what you can and enjoy the shape of the oldies - SCOTT DAY on Apr 12, 7:22 PM
      1. Mk IV Female - Ian Stapley on May 12, 12:03 AM
    2. Still a reasonably new entrant - Ian Stapley on Apr 13, 1:32 AM
     
  3. Anyone willing to write the reviews? - Peter Kempf on Apr 12, 10:44 PM
    1. 1/35 reviews - eugene sautin on Apr 13, 1:22 PM
      1. Great! - Peter Kempf on Apr 17, 3:14 PM
        1. reviews - eugene sautin on Apr 17, 5:26 PM
          1. Please do! - Peter Kempf on Apr 18, 8:54 AM
     


Terms and Conditions of Use Report abuse