Home > Discussion Groups > World War I and 1920s + 1930s

Message posting guidelines:
1.

Full real names must be used at all times.

2.
A valid e-mail address must be provided. (This is not optional)
3.
Images must be posted at low resolution (72 dpi) and no larger than 760 pixels wide, and copyright/trade mark owners must be credited whenever reasonably possible.
4. From 20 April, registration is compulsory if you wish to post messages on the Discussion Groups. For further information, please see the following message: http://www.network54.com/Forum/message?forumid=282066&messageid=1113823087
Please read our Community guidelines before posting.
By contributing to this discussion group, you indicate your agreement to the Terms and Conditions of Use.
Posts that violate the guidelines or Terms and conditions of Use of the Missing-lynx.com discussion groups will be erased, and repeated violation of this policy may result in termination of the violator's account.

 Return to Index  

Unditching rails

June 19 2009 at 9:51 AM
  (Login coopmik2)
Missing-Lynx members
from IP address 86.165.34.20


Response to Mark 5, unditching rail

Hiya

Unlike the first Mk IVs, Mk Vs were built with de-ditching gear in place. The Tank Museum has a super set of drawings of the gear, and of course a Mk V with it in place.

War Diaries in the National Archives show that by later on in summer 1918 units gave commnaders the option to leave the beam at home, and it is possible that some extended this to mean the whole outfit - I've no proof one way or the other. However, by and large during the War (not after...) it seems that Vs generally ran with it in place. After the war is a different matter, and lets not forget that some of the best Mk V shots are of Batalions on occupation duty or in the UK.

Mk V*s show both up with both the rails and without, something probably accouted for by the greater length and better going in summer 1918.

Hope this helps

Mike Cooper

 
 Respond to this message   


Terms and Conditions of Use
Report abuse