THE ONTARIO HOCKEY FORUM
Email: WWW. DICEMAN934@HOTMAIL.COM
 

 Return to Index  

Re: Revision 2: 188 players total

June 26 2009 at 6:38 AM
No score for this post		Anonymous  (no login)
from IP address 76.64.66.41


Response to Revision 2: 188 players total
 

will you please lay-out your ground rules as to how you are qualifying which girls get mentioned and which one's aren't. I know of 3 other's from one association who received D1 scholarships, who were not mentioned. Before I put their names up, I want to make sure they meet your qualifications.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Responses

  1. Clarifying 5 year qualifications - Anonymous on Jun 26, 9:28 AM
    1. Re: Clarifying 5 year qualifications - Anonymous on Jun 26, 1:04 PM
      1. every player has - Anonymous on Jun 26, 2:36 PM
        1. Thread Synopsis - Anonymous on Jun 26, 2:54 PM
          1. Re: Thread Synopsis - Anonymous on Jun 26, 3:45 PM
            1. Sorry...when I said number two, I should have ..... - Ther Diceman on Jun 26, 5:15 PM
            2. of Durham's Jr team - Anonymous on Jun 28, 5:14 PM
              1. Re: of Durham's Jr team - Anonymous on Jun 28, 5:29 PM
                1. not what I was saying - Anonymous on Jun 28, 6:10 PM
                  1. can you spell TAMPERING - Anonymous on Jun 30, 7:31 AM
                    1. Re: can you spell TAMPERING - Anonymous on Jul 1, 11:07 PM
                      1. Re: can you spell TAMPERING - Anonymous on Jul 2, 10:21 AM
                    2. Re: can you spell TAMPERING - Anonymous on Jul 2, 12:07 PM
                2. Re: of Durham's Jr team - Anonymous on Jul 6, 6:01 AM
          2. Its "Minor" Hockey not Int AA - Mitterman on Jun 30, 10:05 PM
            1. and further more - anonymous on Jun 30, 10:17 PM
              1. 20% Intermediate Age - Hockey fan on Jul 2, 11:48 AM
                1. 20% Intermediate Age - anonymous on Jul 2, 11:58 AM
                  1. Did the math once...12% - Anonymous on Jul 2, 1:11 PM
                    1. 20% - Hockey Fan on Jul 2, 2:20 PM
                      1. Re: 20% - Anonymous on Jul 2, 2:46 PM
                        1. Re: 20% - The Diceman on Jul 2, 3:20 PM
                          1. Re: 20% - anonymous on Jul 2, 3:30 PM
                            1. Re: 20% - The Diceman on Jul 2, 6:00 PM
                              1. Re: 20% - anonymous on Jul 2, 8:51 PM
                                1. Re: 20% - Anonymous on Jul 3, 12:17 AM
                                  1. re: 20 % - anonymous on Jul 6, 11:38 PM
            2. if I accept your point - Anonymous on Jul 1, 12:59 PM
              1. Re: if I accept your point - Anonymous on Jul 1, 2:05 PM
              2. Sorry, You don't get It - Anonymous on Jul 1, 6:02 PM
                1. yes it does matter - anonymous on Jul 2, 11:51 AM
                  1. A Chip on Your Shoulder - Anonymous on Jul 3, 12:57 AM
                    1. Re: A Chip on Your Shoulder - Anonymous on Jul 3, 11:14 AM
                      1. Can't Disagree with your suggestions - Anonymous on Jul 3, 3:12 PM
                        1. some 'overagers' - Anonymous on Jul 3, 8:52 PM
                    2. A Chip on Your Shoulder - anonymous on Jul 7, 4:25 PM
                      1. Whine--get over it - Anonymous on Jul 7, 6:07 PM
                        1. Re: Whine--get over it - Anonymous on Jul 7, 8:29 PM
                          1. Re: Whine--get over it - Anonymous on Jul 8, 8:07 AM
                            1. I don't disagree with some of your points, but - Anonymous on Jul 8, 11:49 AM
                              1. Re: I don't disagree with some of your points, but - Anonymous on Jul 8, 2:30 PM
                            2. Indeed.. - Anon on Jul 8, 5:04 PM
                            3. Re: Whine--get over it - anonymous on Jul 10, 12:21 PM
                2. Sample Size of 1 - Anonymous on Jul 3, 6:28 PM
                  1. Re: Sample Size of 1 - The Diceman on Jul 3, 9:01 PM
                  2. it's not ALL about marketing... - Anonymous on Jul 3, 9:04 PM
            3. Re: Its "Minor" Hockey not Int AA - Anonymous on Jul 1, 4:33 PM
              1. Re: Its "Minor" Hockey not Int AA - Anonymous on Jul 2, 4:04 AM
            4. can't have it both ways - Anonymous on Jul 3, 9:52 PM
    2. Re: Clarifying 5 year qualifications - Anonymous on Jun 27, 12:15 AM
      1. Re: Clarifying 5 year qualifications - Anonymous on Jun 27, 9:41 AM
        1. Re: Clarifying 5 year qualifications - Anonymous on Jun 27, 11:17 PM
        2. Re: Clarifying 5 year qualifications - Anonymous on Jun 30, 9:02 AM
     
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
Our children are worth the effort!!