If you look at it closely, you will notice that while in the open, it runs on all fours, but that when it reaches the trees, it raises and runs on two legs.
That was noticed on the pic-by-pic analysis that was posted here a while ago.
I have a hypothesis that if this thing is to be a bigfoot, it's either a juvenile one that wanted to play a little, or maybe one that was trying to lure the "intruders" away from something (it's nest, youngs, etc...).
If you look on the BFRO reports, you'll notice that PEI has it's history of giant barefoot tracks too.
I also read some of Coleman's research, which states that Micmac indians from the Maritimes provinces of Canada attributed the cannibalistic trait to their version of the "wild hairy man". So, maybe the one on the film wanted to ambush the runner, and changed it's mind when it saw the filmer?
Ah, so many questions, and so few conclusions. Isn't that typical of BF research? Lol!
Posted on Feb 20, 2002, 5:43 AM from IP address 207.179.188.2