"THE TRANSPARENT EYEBALL"

In his book-length meditation called "Nature," Ralph Waldo Emerson makes the following claims:

"In the woods, we return to reason and faith. There I feel that nothing can befall me in life,--no disgrace, no calamity, (leaving me my eyes,) which nature cannot repair. Standing on the bare ground,--my head bathed by the blithe air, and uplifted into infinite space,--all mean egotism vanishes. I become a transparent eye-ball; I am nothing; I see all; the currents of the Universal Being circulate through me; I am part or particle of God. The name of the nearest friend sounds then foreign and accidental: to be brothers, to be acquaintances,--master or servant, is then a trifle and a disturbance. I am the lover of uncontained and immortal beauty. In the wilderness, I find something more dear and connate than in streets or villages. In the tranquil landscape, and especially in the distant line of the horizon, man beholds somewhat as beautiful as his own nature."

IN YOUR RESPONSE, try to address these two questions: first, how would you guess Emerson's contemporaries might have reacted to a passage like this one? Second, what implications would you expect these ideas to have for Emerson's theories of social life?