#1
I only said "dead" to show how normal people would view it. I believe we should call them patients.
#2 If the patients cannot be resuscitated, the trust can provide for donating the money to a non-profit or existing relatives. There is no apriori reason why the cryonics organization would benefit from such trusts.
I didn't even mention that. The post we were replying to was about "individual member trusts," which George1st explained like this: "The current cryo providers are quite satisfied when they get paid for cryopreservation and do not care about the fact that their deanimated members after their reanimation will be without their money,"
In other words, he supports *reanimation trusts.* Then Jordan Sparks replied "I would love to."
Later Jordan said "I have no interest in trying to take any money with me to the 'other side.'"
So I don't know yet what his position is.
This message has been edited by Edward-M on Mar 18, 2008 11:56 AM This message has been edited by Edward-M on Mar 17, 2008 7:58 PM