If people are revived after being "dead" for decades, this will be the primary newsworthy event. Their wealth (if any) will be secondary. So, do you oppose any attempt at revival?
With so many other possible concerns (such as the possibility of cryonics being regulated out of existence--which has almost actually happened) why pick on wealth creation for people who are cryopreserved? I've told you that the concept has already been publicized in a national newspaper, without causing any significant comment. I've told you that individual trusts have already existed in a cryonics organization, without causing any comment at all. But you just keep on repeating your odd idea that your totally hypothetical notion is the achilles' heel of cryonics.
Weird.