Go back  

Re: Remote/Field Vitrification and Readiness Status of Current Providers

March 19 2008 at 2:29 PM
  (Login melmax)
Veteran Member


Response to Remote/Field Vitrification and Readiness Status of Current Providers

FD: I would be delighted if folks who see through the above charades, would form one or more new companies with real and tangible services to provide, those services including vitrification on the spot which is clear to me improves the odds of longterm success. Right now all we have is shades of Despres.

Show me the money, baby!

Seriously...not many of us have the financial resources to fund a cryonics company, and some of us just don't like beating our heads against the wall, in regard to having to deal with certain "cryonics experts" who think they know a lot more than they do. People keep telling me I should learn to be a little less...errrrr..."harsh" in my criticisms of the LEF-funded organizations, in the hopes of falling back into Saul Kent's favor, but that would never work. I wouldn't be able to keep my mouth shut about what I consider to be an extremely well-established policy of poor management and fiscal irresponsibility, or work alongside certain people whom I consider to be incompetent and/or unethical.

With that said, my doorbell just rang...it was FedEx, delivering a lovely state-of-the-art centrifugal perfusion pump. (I kid you not.) I'll just let you wonder what I'm going to do with it, FD.

 
 Respond to this message