If the public objects to a company sending a golf pro to perform medical procedures, should the company;
a. Send the golf pro, who is already being paid significantly more than an EMT, to EMT school? or;
b. For the same amount of money, hire an experienced paramedic, or EMT, and pay a couple more to rotate call?
I just want to know what other people think about the management decisions being made at SA. There seems to "b" a common sense answer to this question, to me. (This inquiry is made in response to an item in SA's February 2008 News Bulletin.)
Read more, here:
http://cryomedical.blogspot.com/2008/03/bandaids-for-gaping-chest-wounds.html