Return to Index  

Mille's engine spec....

March 3 2006 at 7:26 PM

Velociphile  (Login Velociphile)
AP Discussion Group

Being an ‘engine guy’ I can get pretty excited about a car or bike that may be circulating in the midfield simply because “it has the highest revving wire sprung engine” or whatever. So, for a brand so associated with high performance motorsport and ‘drawing’ upon it for inspiration, I find it odd that the ‘engine’ seems to have such a disappointing spec for a ‘technorak’ like myself.

If I draw an analogy with engines, we can assess them in very specific terms and I’ve always had a formula in the back of my mind when I look at a watch that says:

Chances of being impressed ~= (vph^2 X balance wheel inertia X power reserve)

If I apply this to RM, I come up short. Why is it that the RM range seems to mostly consist of an unremarkable 21600 frequency, with a modest 10 mgcm2 balance and average power reserve of 50-70 hours or so? In fact the balance power is 1/3 to a 1/4 of a Rolex 3135. That doesn’t sound very ‘F1’. Surely with these unique applied materials we should be looking at the highest combination of balance power and energy reserve?

Velociphile

 
 Respond to this message   
Responses

ThePuristS.com Home Page