You appear to have a very exact preference function. Indeed, to the point of excluding any untangibles about design, looks, straightforward sex appeal... There are motorbikes that not only appeal in terms of the engine, but also the design and 'look' of the thing. (I know, such a bike would not appeal to you). Likewise, the Richard Mille watch appeals to a number of emotions that does not only include the 'crank' characteristics of the engine. Given your preference function, and equal weighting on the elements, any watch that produces the highest frequency will win out, almost independent of either of the other two named factors. But I get your point. Using modern material it should be possible to improve the 'engine performance' part of the watch as well as other characteristics. Fair enough, and I agree with you on that. I wish the RM line would start to look at such functions, although perhaps not just in line to meet the Velociphile preference function.
What I do love about the tourbillon design for Richard Mille, that was introduced with the RM001, is the idea of using the cage as a shock protection device and specifically designing it that way. I love the case design (the tourneau shape with the lateral supports), and I also love the introduction of new material elements that may, or may not, improve the watch. Indeed, the elements that are used are included on a self admitted experimental basis, and only time will tell if they really work. Richard Mille is more concerned with structural rigidity and weight and improving these elements. I would argue his watches, like almost any other brand, appeal to the emotions.
However, good and valid point and certainly worth making. Thanks for posting.
