Re: RE: Clipping the proportional term

by Dave Fox

 

I think you're correct. My problem is that their function block doesn't let you see the individual contributions and doesn't set a bit if the proportional contribution is greater than 100%. The operators, and I, get a little confused when we see a process variable above a setpoint and the controller output steady at 100%, not coming down as it should. I'm suggesting to AB that they set a status bit so you know this is happening.

I'm still curious how other vendors handle this, though. I haven't found sufficient detail in on-line docs from other vendors to indicate how they handle clipping.



Posted on Dec 12, 2003, 6:27 AM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

  1. Re: RE: Clipping the proportional term. , Dec 12, 2003
    1. Re: Re: RE: Clipping the proportional term. Dave Fox, Dec 15, 2003
      1. Bailey Infi 90 Controllers. , Dec 16, 2003
        1. Re: Bailey Infi 90 Controllers. Dave Fox, Dec 16, 2003
      2. Re: Re: RE: Clipping the proportional term. , Dec 18, 2003

Find more forums on Science and TechnologyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement