According to John Norton, Divine Albert did not lie about the Michelson-Morley experiment; only "later writers" did:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00001743/02/Norton.pdf
John Norton: "Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas later writers almost universally use it as support for the light postulate of special relativity......THE MICHELSON-MORLEY EXPERIMENT IS FULLY COMPATIBLE WITH AN EMISSION THEORY OF LIGHT THAT CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE."

Yet Divine Albert seems to be the original liar:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9806EFDD113FEE3ABC4152DFB266838A639EDE
The New York Times, April 19, 1921
"Michelson showed that relative to the moving co-ordinate system K1, the light traveled with the same velocity as relative to K, which is contrary to the above observation. How could this be reconciled? Professor Einstein asked."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

Original text of paper M@M is the best joke, I even red. Read it, you will see velocity of light in tube fulfilled with water. This velocity depends on the direction, depending factor goes to 23%. Snell law and all the optics? Whatfor that, when M@M is more interesting!