<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  

WHAT DISCONFIRMS STRING THEORY

September 10 2008 at 7:01 AM
 

 
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.09/stringtheory.html
Lee Smolin: "Well, every string theory that's been written down says the speed of light is universal. But other ideas about quantum gravity predict the speed of light has actually increased. And an experiment on the Gamma Ray Large Area Space Telescope, launching next year, will check this. So I've said, look, if the speed of light isn't universal, that disconfirms string theory. But the string theorists say they could probably invent versions of the theory that work either way. We'd have to change our notion of what science is to accommodate this proposition. You just can't do science on that basis."

If the speed of light isn't universal, that also disconfirms Divine Albert's Divine Special Relativity:

http://www.fqxi.org/data/articles/Searching_for_the_Golden_Spike.pdf
"Loop quantum gravity also makes the heretical prediction that the speed of light depends on its frequency. That prediction violates special relativity, Einstein's rule that light in a vacuum travels at a constant speed for all observers..."

If string theory and Divine Albert's Divine Special Relativity are disconfirmed, what should be worshipped? Smolin's loop quantum gravity and Divine Albert's Divine General Relativity of course - both of them predict, explicitly or implicitly, that frequency and speed of light vary together.

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Anonymous

Re: WHAT DISCONFIRMS STRING THEORY

September 10 2008, 9:56 AM 

All this article, which you cite, does is demonstrate that modern physics is pueudo-science. There is very little science left in what scientists like to call science. Most of it is pseudo-science in todays world. An example of a pseudo-science is astrology.

 
 

Re: WHAT DISCONFIRMS STRING THEORY

September 10 2008, 8:09 PM 

There is a confession of Einstein made in 1954 that Einsteinians either ignore or try to ridicule:

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=317&Itemid=81&lecture_id=3576
John Stachel: "Einstein discussed the other side of the particle-field dualism - get rid of fields and just have particles."
Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary physics."
John Stachel's comment: "If I go down, everything goes down, ha ha, hm, ha ha ha."

It can be shown that Einstein's 1954 confession is equivalent to two statements by Bryan Wallace (who managed to write his "The Farce of Physics" while dying):

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm
Bryan Wallace: "Einstein's special relativity theory with his second postulate that the speed of light in space is constant is the linchpin that holds the whole range of modern physics theories together. Shatter this postulate, and modern physics becomes an elaborate farce!....The speed of light is c+v."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com

 
 
Current Topic - WHAT DISCONFIRMS STRING THEORY  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement