In understanding the nature of information transmission in baryonic particles it becomes easier to understand the the nature of information transmission between Baryonic particles and Dark Matter. Information needs to be transmitted from the baryonic atom to the Dark Matter particle through Magnetism. Dark matter ignores photons because they lack charge. Dark matter reacts to charge, all charges +/- in the same manner. Dark matter is repulsed by charge.

There are 2 known particles that can convert magnetism into information. The Electron and the Gluon. We can rule out the electron as a particle of dark matter because it has charge. Also if electrons were in intersteller space, photons would never make it through the medium and we would not see other galaxies. The gluon is a more promising particle that could be part of the dark matter chain.

We know that the gluon converts magnetism into color using Quantum Chromodynamics. When Dark matter is in the presence of magnetism the dark matter is repelled. The interaction between Dark Matter sub-atomic particles is stronger than the magnetism applied to it. Magnetism is not strong enough to break the normal bond between the gluon and the dark matter particle attached to it. Magnetism bends this bond.

The chain nature of dark matter becomes obvious when gluons are inserted between dark matter particles. These chains form fabrics and the more dense they become the harder is becomes for baryonic particles and photons to move through them. Pioneer 10 and 11 show this in their attempts to exit the solar system.

This is from my blog
http://aaronsreality.blogspot.com
Aaron

Matter and “dark matter"
Fact and Speculation.
=========.
1.
Fact.
The detected material mass of the matter in the Universe is so small
(the average density of all substance in the Universe is approximately
p=10^-30 g/sm^3) that it cannot “ close “ the Universe and therefore
our Universe as whole is “ open”, endless.
But what to do with the infinite Universe the physicists don't know.
The concept of infinite/ eternal means nothing
to a scientists. They do not understand how they could
draw any real, concrete conclusions from this characteristic.
A notions of "more", "less", "equally, "similar" could not
be conformed to a word infinity or eternity.
The Infinity/Eternity is something, that has no borders,
has no discontinuity; it could not be compared to anything.
Considering so, scientists came to conclusion that the
infinity/eternity defies to a physical and mathematical definition
and cannot be considered in real processes.
Therefore they have proclaimed the strict requirement
(on a level of censor of the law):
« If we want that the theory would be correct,
the infinity/eternity should be eliminated ».
Thus they direct all their mathematical abilities,
all intellectual energy to the elimination of infinity.
Therefore they invented an abstract "dark matter" and " dark energy".
They say: " 90% or more of the matter in the Universe is unseen.
And nobody knows what it is.
2.
Speculation.
Unknown “dark matter “ it is matter which makes up the difference
between observed mass of a galaxies and calculated mass……
which….will …” close “ ….the Universe, as …….
as……the astrophysicists want.
3.
The Dark Matter is another official dogma of our astronomy.
/ V. H. Vergon. /
==============..

Lets do the responses first

1) Just because something is big, really, really, does not mean it is infinite. I don't think I used the word infinite in my writings anywhere. Actually most of the examples in my model are from discrete pictures or data streams.
2) My model does not care if the universe is a snowglobe or 'Open'. As a matter of fact the universe does not care about much. At all.
3) I have never defined the density of the universe, I think that is a little premature and arrogent. I have removed gravity and replaced it with density.
4) The main fact I use to support this gluon - dark matter interaction is that the gluon can read magnetism without having a charge. This is necessary for information to pass from one galaxy to another in the intersteller medium without losing photon-waves. We see the galaxies.
5) The secondary fact I use to define Dark Matter is the Pioneer spacecraft. They hit a barrier when trying to exit the solar system perpendicular to the solar equatorial plane. This barrier was completly unexpected. These craft are turning around to re-enter the solar system.
6) Since dark matter is as yet to be fully defined, I cannot see how its a 'Dogma'. e=mc^2, f=ma, f=-gm1m2/r^2 are examples of dogma. Gravity is Dogma. The graviton does not exist. Kinda like the Higgs, and God particles.
7) When you setup the known particles and ask how does information transfer from one atom to another. An interesting model shows itself. Oh yeah, black holes burp baryonic matter as stars. That is rather interesting.

If you want you can read a model that does not use gravity. http://aaronsreality.blogspot.com
Start at the bottom and read up.

I don't know who these 'they' people are, but it is obvious you dont like them.
a

Aaron, I wouldn't say that Socratus doesn't like these people, he just sees the lack of logic in their reasoning.

I have no idea whether Socratus rejects the Hubble "redshift is receding motion" principle, that conventional astronomers apply to all redshifted objects, or not.

I reject it. Hubble himself was not sure his principle applied to all redshifted objects. Halton Arp, and others have proven it. Only the dogmatic, religiously convicted Big Bangers cling to it.

When the cosmic distances are readjusted to correct the silly notion that QUASARs are the oldest, most distant objects, the universe becomes a fairly static, (not motionless) stable place. It then become possible that it is infinitely old, and possibly limited in space. The religiously convicted cannot contemplate this idea, so they will remain in the dust.

Curt,

What is the lack of reason? I dont understand. What is it with the concept of aether, that is so repugnant? What are the rules that this breaking? I just don't understand.

I would think the concept of an aether would just be an extension of the atmosphere or any other media. These differences between baryonic magnetic material and the non magnetic dark matter allows for bubbles in the aether. This would be where baryonic matter can interact with the rules of magnetism, e/m, ...

If there is to be an aether it needs a mechanism in which the bubble is defined. In my opinion this is magnetism. Magnetism through the W+/- boson vibrates charge and force. I am beginning to think that this W boson is only read/written by the gluon. That the electron converts photons into z bosons to pass to the gluon.

This transfer of information tells the dark matter particle how much magnetic pressure is being applied and how much it needs to recoil. At its root, force is information. Each force/boson holds information on itself, describing its originator. The the Quark or Dark Matter equivilant expresses this information.

Where are my obvious holes in this model?
Many thanks
a

http://nuclear.ucdavis.edu/~tgutierr/files/sml2.pdf

When I say the equations I see look medusa ugly. Look at this. It uses everything except gravity which is what I am looking for. UCDavis wow!

there is no legend to this mess.

a

Infinity and Eternity can be tested with Logic.

You don't need to delve into mathematics or metamathematics.

You just need to open your eyes.

Mathematics only describes the particulars of a supposedly logical set of parameters. If the logic is fantasy, so is the math.

I'm not sure where Aaron latched onto "dark matter." I understand that it was invented to keep the Big Bang theory alive. Since the Big Bang theory is dead, although the "believers" refuse to attend the wake, the is no reason to keep the invention.

==========
Information.
============
#
Dark energy may be vacuum
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-01/uoc-dem011607.php

#
When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothingthe vacuum, that endless
infinite void.
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18-nothingness-of-space-theory-of-everything

http://discovermagazine.com/topics/space
#

================

I use the model of dark matter from Rubin and Ford's work. They showed that stars in a galaxy would fly apart if they did not have a medium in which they existed.

My model of dark matter shows how the interaction of magnetism bends the dark matter and builds the bubble that baryonic matter will exist in. Inside this dark matter bubble, baryonic matter interacts. In our solar system the sun produces intense magnetism. This concept produces a radiative model of gravity.

axioms of dark matter (Aaron's Model)
1) dark matter is repulsed by charge (magnetism)
2) as dark matter is repulsed it becomes more dense, eventually pushing back on the baryonic bubble.
3) dark matter is produced by chaining 2 gluon together. Gluon read w bosons to convert energy to magnetism.

Evidence of dark matter
1) Pioneer 10 and 11 trajectories
2) galactic super clusters show a medium in which they exist. They act like a rock thrown into water.
pictures on my blog.

From my blog
http://aaronsreality.blogspot.com

First attempt at a description of Gravity.

Peter Duffett-Smith's amazing paragraph. Practical Astronomy with your Calculator

"A celestial observer viewing the solar system from a great distance would not, however see the Moon making loops in space about the Earth. Rather, he would describe the situation by saying that the Moon is in orbit around the Sun, as is the Earth, and that the effect of the Earth's influence is to make the Moon's orbit wiggle a little as the relative positions of the Earth and Moon change. This is because the Sun's Gravitation force on the Moon is much greater than that of the Earth, even though the latter is nearer. "

The n-body problem describe this. The n-body problem shows that gravity cannot describe more than 2 objects interacting together. f = -gm1m2/r^2 does not work for multiple objects. On the first orbit the moon would be ripped from around the earth because of the intensity of the sun.

I would like to use this paragraph to describe gravity.

"This is because the Sun's Gravitation force on the Moon is much greater than that of the Earth, even though the latter is nearer". The Sun is an absolutely massive radiation emitter. Its primary radiation strength extends to beyond Mars, Its secondary fields extend past planets into the ice fields beyond Pluto. These areas of radiation are well defined.

At this point lets consider our star has no orbiting debris. Also our star does not exist before time T0. Time exists before T0 but the baryonic matter star does not exist. We have a Riemannian manifold in Hilbert space. This is a massive space. Each point in the space is filled with a Vacuum Energy. The Vacuum Energy contains information on the Dark Matter particle that fills the Vacuum Energy space.

Upon time reaches T0 our Baryon filled star winks into existence inside our space as a manifold. As the baryonic radiation emissions of the star expands to it maximum, Dark Matter particles are pushed back, repelled by the existence of Baryons. Within days Dark Matter particles have been pushed back past ~3 au. Now Dark Matter particles have mass. Our baryon radiation from the star has traveled far enough that there is enough distance between them to no longer be strong enough to push the now pressurized Dark Matter particles. Dark matter particles start to push back on the baryons. We get an equilibrium between dark and baryonic matter. There are some areas of Void between the Dark and baryonic particles. This is important.

Now between the stars edge and the edge of the Dark matter is 3 au. This area is Void except for odd bits of baryonic radiation. Each bit of baryonic radiation has its own magnetic field and charge. Non-baryonic radiation (photons, free electrons) pass through the non-baryonic dark matter. This is why we can see galaxies through the soup of non-baryonic dark matter.

Then there is the curvature of space

The curvature of space is a function of the density of baryons, the magnetic field, and radioactive particles emitted from the baryonic object. Really it is just the pressurization of dark matter against the baryonic matter's magnetism.

The magnetic field planets/planetoids:
Many of the planets have a magnetic field. This field is called the magnetosphere. Any of the spinning massive bodies has magnetism if it has a warm metalic core. These magnetic fields repel dark matter at a much greater rate than the baryons alone.


The non-magnetic field planet/planetoids:
The general density of an object's baryons has magnetism. This inherit magnetism causes dark matter to repel. But not nearly as much as the magnetic field. The lunar surface shows differentials in gravity to the topology [Cite:A. S. Konopliv].

The massive gas giants have cores that are magnetic. The magnetic field has been examined by NASA and others. The curvature of the space/time around Jupiter is far greater than the mass of the planet alone.

There are many more points that I describe that are needed to have a dark matter model.

I show that black holes emit radiation in large amounts with pictures and equations. This is antithetical to current models of black holes.

The big bang as a singular event is not supported in my model. My model shows many bangs that do not work at all like Hawkins states.

Dark matter and the interactions with baryonic matter solve many issues that current models do not even tackle.

This is why I still use dark matter in my model. There needs to be a medium in which baryonic matter exists.

Aaron
http://aaronsreality.blogspot.com

p.s. my blog needs to be read from bottom to top.

Thanks