Where is the humility?
March 27, 2009 "Who are we to think that we are the supreme beings?" This is the question I wish to ask anyone who thinks that we can successfully solve the riddles of nature. First of all, the person who thinks that he is supreme lacks humility. Many of us do including me (for I would not even dare to write about this subject otherwise). Humility is of utmost importance for explorers of heavens (physicists) but it cannot be expressed lucidly for the job of a physicist is to explain the heavens. And there arises the dilemma. One can say that who was Einstein to claim that the space-time was bent? And until the answer to this question is delivered (by the proof of Einstein's claim) one is free to presume that Einstein lacked humility.
Now lets discuss the real world.[****] Of course, every one of us is a pompous being with ego created by success. A PhD can brag about his erudite status just like a wealthy can brag about his profligate life. Now one might presume that these people lack humility just like one presumed that Einstein lacked humility. But there is going to be one profound difference. Einstein's lack of humility was a presumption while a PhD's and a wealthy mans lack of humility is a universal truth. The one who agrees with me is either an Einstein fan, a person with humility or a person who just does not care. I would consider most of the reader belonging to the latter category just because it proves that many of us lack humilityhttp://www.scienceblog.com/cms/comment/reply/19863


[****] - I like the bit where he talks about Einstein then says let's get to the real world; because obviously Einstein's world is nothing to do with reality.

AAF: No Relativist, in the past or the present or the future, could have or could or can answer this very simple question: Why can gravity curve the space-time continuum of General Relativity, and electromagnetism cannot? That is because the right answer and the only answer to the above question is that there is no curvature of space or time or both. The curvature of space or time or both is a figment of Einstein's imagination and has no basis in logic or reality. It's just a myth nothing more and nothing less. So please say goodbye to the theory of General Relativity; it's monstrous mathematical structure can hide its absurdities no more.




Cincirob: No, AAF, they can all answer it. The existence of magnetic field means there is energy. That energy has a certain amount of mass according to m = E/c^2. That mass will distort spacetime just like any other mass. That is because the right answer and the only answer to the above question is that there is no curvature of space or time or both. The curvature of space or time or both is a figment of Einstein's imagination and has no basis in logic or reality. It's just a myth nothing more and nothing less. The answer is both...you are the myth. So please say goodbye to the theory of General of Relativity; it's monstrous mathematical structure can hide its absurdities no more. No, it's time you said goodbye to the flawed idea that you can talk relativity to death...experiments are the only way to show relativity is wrong.




AAF: No, Cincirob, they can't! Electrical fields and magnetic fields are much more powerful than gravitational fields. So, why do, according to General Relativity, gravitational fields curve space and time, but electrical and magnetic fields do not? That is the daunting question that gave Einstein so many sleepless nights. The mass of a magnetic field is no substitute for its power. That is because that mass is so small and insignificant compared to the intrinsic power of the magnetic field itself, which is 10⁴⁰ greater than the attracting power of its mass. So please say goodbye to General Relativity before science says goodbye to you!

AAF: So, why do, according to General Relativity, gravitational fields curve space and time, but electrical and magnetic fields do not?

Ted: they do, imbecile. Read cincirob's answer.

Idiot Ted, would you spend $40 on this 'electromagnetic space-time warping' BOOKLET?



The "Philadelphia Experiment" -- fact, legend, or whatever it is --
continues to haunt those of us who have been hooked by that
persistent tale of electromagnetic space-time warping that may have
teleported a U. S. Navy ship in 1943. I, for one, want to crack
this nut wide open, and so I'm always looking for new info on this
and related subjects.

FRASER'S MAIN THESIS:
Alexander S. Fraser's main thesis is that the "field" created around
the U.S.S. Eldridge (or whatever ship was used) was NOT
electromagnetic in nature, contrary to what most of us have assumed;
it was a THERMAL field.

He asserts that any warping of space-time (a la Einstein) would have
exhibited "enormous gravitational anomalies", which are absent from
the usual PE accounts. Fraser interprets Einstein's theory to
anticipate such gravitational 'shock waves' if space-time had
actually been warped by massive electromagnetic fields.

He then concludes that, although INVISIBILITY is probably what the
Navy was indeed trying to accomplish, the MAGNETIC WARP explanation
is probably mere legend-- perhaps first suggested by Carlos M.
Allende's ASSUMPTIONS that the tests involved Einstein's Unified
Field Theories.

At this point Fraser looks at what Allende alleges to have
WITNESSED, rather than simply speculated about-- Allende's remarks
about a "scorch" field, fire, optical wavering like that seen
through heated air-- all components of Fraser's "thermal field".
http://www.softwareartist.com/PHILEXP/FRASER.TXT

Why would I spend 40$ for a crackpot book? You should spend afew bucks on a physics book such that you learn a little physics and you stop spouting imbecilities, AAF.

You're just saying that, because he's evidently less cranky and more creative and more daring than you! --->>>>>>

He's a crank, you are an idiot crank, so you top him :lol:

'LOL' at you, Idiot Ted-->>>>>>
'Idiot' is the IBM replacement for your 'Dr'...
You know nothing about 'Thermal Warping of Space & Time'!
Fraser is way smarter than you...

Fraser is a crank, you are a crank idiot