Curving Space & Time





Einstein states the following in his 1916 paper:

We thus find the occurrence of a gravitational field connected with a space-time variability of the g. So, too, in the general case, when we are no longer able by a suitable choice of co-ordinates to apply the special theory of relativity to a finite region, we shall hold fast to the view that g describe the gravitational field. Thus, according to the general theory of relativity, gravitation occupies an exceptional position with regard to other forces, particularly the electromagnetic forces, since the ten functions representing the gravitational field at the same time define the material properties of the space measured.


Clearly, the whole curvature idea is an out and out conjecture made by Einstein with no logical basis whatsoever. I'm very sure of that!

In the above passage, we see the first glimpse of the major riddle that to occupy Einstein for the rest of his life:

Why does gravity warp the four-dimensional space-time continuum, but electromagnetism does not?

Certainly, electromagnetism is much more powerful than gravitation; and it should inflict more warping and distortion on space and time than gravity.

At first, Einstein thought 'exceptional' is the answer; that is to say the gravitational force is exceptional and electromagnetic forces are not. But why is it exceptional? Later on, however, Einstein tried all sorts of hypothetical fields and unifying schemes to overcome this formidable objection to his General Relativity, but none of them could answer this question:

Why does gravity curve Einstein's space-time continuum and electromagnetism does not?


No Relativist, in the past or the present or the future, could have or could or can answer this very simple question:

Why can gravity curve the space-time continuum of General Relativity, and electromagnetism cannot?

That is because the right answer and the only answer to the above question is that there is no curvature of space or time or both. The curvature of space or time or both is a figment of Einstein's imagination and has no basis in logic or reality. It's just a myth nothing more and nothing less.


So please say goodbye to the theory of General of Relativity; it's monstrous mathematical structure can hide its absurdities no more.

AAF: No Relativist, in the past or the present or the future, could have or could or can answer this very simple question:

Why can gravity curve the space-time continuum of General Relativity, and electromagnetism cannot?

cinci: No, AAF, they can all answer it. The existence of magnetic field means there is energy. That energy has a cerain amount of mass according to m = E/c^2. That mass will distort spacetime just like any other mass.
**************************************

AAF: That is because the right answer and the only answer to the above question is that there is no curvature of space or time or both. The curvature of space or time or both is a figment of Einstein's imagination and has no basis in logic or reality. It's just a myth nothing more and nothing less.

cinci: The asnwer is both...you are the myth.
*******************************

AAF: So please say goodbye to the theory of General of Relativity; it's monstrous mathematical structure can hide its absurdities no more.

cinci: No, it's time you said goodby to the flawed idea that you can talk relativity to death...experiments are the only way to show relativity is wrong.
*********************

Jose: http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/00current.htm




Cincirob: Great article, Jose. 80% of it just tells you that conventional theory is wrong...without giving a single reason why; and the other 20% is: "J092712.65+294344.0 is under extreme electrical stress as are all quasars. For the quasar to emit such incredible energies through simple gravitational compression, the dust and gas would have to be so dense that it would exceed the amount of material a galaxy can contain. However, the research team at Max Planck are mathematicians, which allows them to work through densities without limit. The "black holes" whose effects are supposed to be influencing time and space throughout the universe are convenient ways to explain away the amazing forces of electric currents permeating space." Is this the logic I'm supposed to be missing? Nobody says quasars emit their incredible energies through simple gravitational collapse. Thees folks are lying to you...wake up.




AAF: You're wrong again, Cincirob! Everybody, well almost everybody is saying that ' quasars emit their incredible energies through simple gravitational collapse':
http://dnausers.d-n-a.net/dnetGOjg/Black/Holes.htm

cinci: Pitiful AAF, you didn't even read your own article:

Structure of a Quasar

Theoretical models of quasars have been developed serving to explain their features.


The currently accepted model of a quasar places a spinning Black Hole at its center. This spinning action produces a "swirl of space" pulling gas streams in a spiral motion towards the hole. These gas streams collide as a result of the enormous gravitional energy, thereby creating intense friction and heating the disk. This is what gives a quasar its high luminosity.

This spinning action of the black hole, capturing the gases, creates a gyroscopic effect. The effect of this is to hold the accredition disk in the same equitorial orientation near the center of the hole.

From the center of a quasar two oppositely pointed Jets emerge in the form of hot magnitised gas. These jets of gas eminating from the quasars central engine feed the radio lobes which can be picked up on earth by interferometers.

These jets form as fast thin streams of gas projecting outward in opposite directions for distances up to 1 million light years. The jets remain straight, due to the gyroscopic effect of the spinning black hole and accredition disk, indicating that their direction has remained constant over a considerable period of time.

A number of explainations have been put forward to explain the formation of two oppositely pointed jets eminating from the black hole/accretion disk of a quasar."