<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  

Viral Theorem

May 13 2009 at 11:23 AM
 

 
AAF pointed me to this idea. Thanks.

http://www4.nau.edu/meteorite/Meteorite/Book-GlossaryV.html

2T+U=0

M = (2v^2R)/G

My biggest issue with the Viral Theorem is the big M. And that G thing.

Mass is a zero Dimensional. Mass is not density. Mass is not size or shape. Mass is not even a point. You cannot reduce density to mass then return to the original density. This equation is designed to reduce complex systems to a simple solution.

Then there is that attractive Gravity based on mass. The great particle accelerators have yet to find any sign of a graviton. They predict new particles to compensate for this G. They have crashed enough atoms to build a legend of vibrations but the Graviton is not found.

a


 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

Re: Viral Theorem

May 13 2009, 6:59 PM 




Aaron;

It's very likely that there is really no graviton; and that the graviton exists only inside the wild imagination of contemporary physicists.

 
 

Density

May 13 2009, 9:47 PM 

It seems to me that we have already solved this problem in chemistry and in the great particle accelerators.

Chemistry: The use of 'Specific Gravity'. I remember in high school chemistry having to calculate specific gravity for several mixtures. I wish they had just called it Density. Then it would have made sense. The need to make this difficult is why kids don't learn.

Particle Accelerators have found all kinds of vibrations. They even put all the information in a nice little chart. But their need to find gravity has blinded them to the simplicity of what they have discovered.

Have I described my model completely? Are there any glaring holes in it?

Aaron

 
 
Current Topic - Viral Theorem  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement