Saturday, June 27, 2009 . Lecture: Neutrino Lesson for Dissidents.

/ by David de Hilster /

http://www.worldnpa.org/pdf/events/FriendlyLetter.pdf
/ World Science Database. /
================================= .

My opinion.
1.
Trying to save e The law of conservation and transformation energy e
Wolfgang Pauli discover ( theorized) neutrino eon the end of his pen.f
2.
According to QED Electron has infinity energy in interaction
with vacuum: E= .
But according to e The law of conservation
and transformation energy e it is impossible.
3.
So. How to understand this situation?
What does f The law of conservation and transformation energy/ massf
mean according to one single electron or photon or neutrino ?
======= .
P.S.
#
Robert Milliken in his Nobel speech ( 1923) told, that he knew
nothing about the elast essence of electron e.
#
You know, it would be sufficient to really understand the electron.
/ Albert Einstein./
#
Tell me what an electron is and I'll then tell you everything.
/ From an article./
#
All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, ' What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken.
( Albert Einstein, 1954)

The same Einsteinfs words is possible to say about electron.
#
More than ten different models of the electron are presented here. (!!!)
More than twenty models are discussed briefly. (!!!)
Thus, the book gives a complete picture of contemporary theoretical
thinking (traditional and new) about the physics of the electron.

/ book e What is the Electron? e
Volodimir Simulik
Montreal, Canada. 2005. /
http://redshift.vif.com/BookBlurbs/Electron.htm

And it is possible to find 100 more models of electron in the internet.
============== .
So. My conclusion.
1.
The neutrino problem was raised from the wish to keep (preserve !)
e The law of conservation and transformation energy/ massf.
2.
We donft know what electron and photon are and therefore
we donft know what neutrino is.
3.
In my opinion the discussion about neutrino, photon, electron
and others micro particles must be connected with
e The law of conservation and transformation energy/ massf.
Without this connection every dispute is tautology.
====== .
Best wishes.
Israel Sadovnik. / Socratus.

http://www.worldnpa.org/php2/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=1372
===================== . .

Dissidents don't take lessons.

I was feeling kind of down, because I did not know where to look next. I get tired of arguing the same concepts that were created to fit the data or lack of data.

I have posted a model that describes the interactions of the universe without gravity. It is amazing how the paradoxes/problems fall away when gravity is abandon. It's really easier to read it as science fiction until you get to the equations. It reads from bottom to top.

http://aaronsreality.blogspot.com

A theory is not a fact. It is not a fact that all objects fall to the earth. It is not a fact that they fall at the same rate or fall at all. It is not a fact that the sun attracts objects. The orbit of mercury disproves gravity.

The axioms we use in cosmology are not real. They are the ideas of the time. I agree we need to clear the table and look at the evidence.
Aaron

Aaron, why don't you reorganize your blog so it reads top down?
Or is reading bottom-up part of being radical?

Yeah, I know it is difficult to read. I have yet to find a solution at blogspot that will easily solve this problem. Even if it is read from top to bottom, It still lacks a continuum. It really is a stream of consciousness.

I have noted on the blog that I am trying to turn this into a standard paper. I just have no experience in this. There are many topics that are necessary to describe the model.

I just don't know how to start. Do I start with the problems of current cosmology? Or do I start with Dark Energy? I have several attempts at this. They just lay in Word starting at me.

I think the way it should be laid out is:
1) General Introduction and Asymmetry
2) Dark Energy Shape and Computations
3) Dark Matter Shape and Composition
4) Baryon basic structure and density
4a) Information
5) W Boson and its interactions with Dark Matter
6) Z Boson and Electricity and Plasma
7) Photon and Temperature
8) Gluon and Information
9) Phases of Work and Expression

But I have never done this before. I use to think nobody would read the model. Really, who would read my thoughts. Now I need to make it more readable.

Aaron

Aaron, your "dark matter" is a totally different idea than the one hypothesized by the creators of the original idea. I think you should name your "dark matter" something else.

JR

I did not think people would understand a new name let alone a new concept. I intended to describe what was occurring here.



Then I found proof of my idea of bending photons in this picture from NOAO



So what would two or 4 anti-gluons configuration be called. I think it should be many dark matter fabrics or sheets. The baryon's W boson pressurizes the sheet forming a bubble around the baryon

I did not think calling it Aaron's matter would help in getting people to read it.

Aaron