Rewriting General Relativity?

Putting A New Model Of Quantum Gravity Under The Microscope

















Does an exciting but controversial new model of quantum gravity reproduce Einstein's theory of general relativity?



Scientists at Texas A&M University in the US explore this question in a paper appearing in Physical Review Letters and highlighted with a Viewpoint in the August 24th issue of Physics.



"If it ain't broke, don't fix it," sums up fairly well how many scientists have viewed Einstein's theory of general relativity. The theory, which Einstein developed in the early 20th century, says that matter curves spacetime, and it is this curvature which deflects massive bodies an effect that we interpret as the influence of gravity. The theory has been tested to extremely high accuracy and without it, our satellite global positioning system would be off by about 10 km per day.



Despite the success of general relativity, one of the most important problems in modern physics is finding a theory of quantum gravity that reconciles the continuous nature of gravitational fields with the inherent 'graininess' of quantum mechanics. Recently, Petr Horava at Lawrence Berkeley Lab proposed such a model for quantum gravity that has received widespread interest, in no small part because it is one of the few models that could be experimentally tested. In Horava's model, Lorentz symmetry, which says that physics is the same regardless of the reference frame, is violated at small distance scales, but remerges over longer distance scales



The team at Texas A&M, which includes Hong Lu, Jianwei Mei and Christopher Pope, report their investigations into how the modifications proposed in Horava's theory will broadly affect the solutions of general relativity. One aspect of their study is that it leads to an important caveat, described by Horatiu Nastase in a Viewpoint commentary in Physics (physics.aps.org). Lu et al.'s calculations, explains Nastase, suggest that Horava's model only reproduces general relativity on unobservable scales, "larger than the size of the Universe".



Lu et al.'s paper is an important contribution to testing the Ho?ava model and shows that a good deal of work remains to understand its full implications.


Adapted from materials provided by American Physical Society, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS.

ScienceDaily (Aug. 26, 2009)

http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0904/0904.1595v4.pdf

This paper shows again how useful the least action principle remains for explorations in theoretical physics. Just as if the LAP could be the most consensual and sustainable principle of physics.