To list in point form some attributes of the paper:

Quotes:

Quote: '18) That travelling at the speed of light squared is possible'
Quote: 'Dimension = Space = Energy'
Quote page 211:
begin quote
VT = -1
V + T = 1
-VT = -V -T
-VT + V - T = 0
VT - V + T = 0
V - V/T + T/T = 0 (my note: next step is not correct, minuses)
V - (V+T)/T = 0
V - 1/T = 0
D/T - V/D = 0
D - 1/D = 0 (my note: Next step is not correct, minuses the left side alone by 1)
D^2 - D - 1 = 0
end quote.
Quote: 7) Hyperspace travel exists
Quote:
"I redefined mass as mass = D^3T^2; which means that all volume has mass, and therefore
a photon has mass, and even space has mass. I proposed an experiment somewhere to determine
the volume of a photon, and therefore the mass. This is also tied into explaining why gravity
effects time, and also explains mass in terms of time. This is strongly tired into the
definition where density =T^2"
(This shows misunderstanding of density as mass does not only depend on volume)
Quote: '14) Theory reveals many properties that have an inverse relationship. It is obvious about time and velocity,
but this goes onto many other relationships through the equations.'
Time and Velocity are never always inversely proportional. In most common examples acceleration is taken as positive.
Quote: 29) 'Black holes create space and are a doorway to infinite energy.'
There are many other quotes of flaws in the paper
eg: Energy + Force + Volume = 0


Notes:
Written in first person
No references
No experimental data
Reference to gods
The writer has never done a Physics or mathematics degree
Misunderstanding of dimensions and vectors.
Basic alegbra is the only form of mathematics, which through the paper sometimes has mistakes.
Calls velocity a base factor of the universe (it is a rate between two others).
Lack of term definition.

Conclusion:
Theory validity limits toward 0.
This theory has many perceivable mistakes and would be unable to calculate most (if not all) situations possible in our universe.

Here is the current update of trans dimensional unified field theory. You can access it on the internet at
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/8424853/Trans-Dimensional-Unified-Field-Theory-82009

I also have a physics group at

http://www.linkedin.com/groupInvitation?groupID=1931832&sharedKey=1141AE749569

Thank you.

George James Ducas

when going from scalar to proper form, the signs shift from minus to plus and vice verse, doesn't work like normal math.

I'm feeling unfied, myself!

George, Objective Reason certainly gave you some harsh criticism, no?

Do/did you respond to his/her critical points?

I have to go, need aspirin for that unfied feeling.

From what I saw Mr Ducas of the review I would remind the author that a chimp with a calculator could do complex math and regergitate definitions from a text in sign without out ever comprehending the complexity or the simplisaty of the idea that generated them.

We are talking about a theory people and like all theories they have flaws or they would be laws. Is there anything in Trans-Dimensional Unified Field theory that at current or in the near future can be tested or measured?

Is this just one more of many mind exercises that can only look good on paper?
Will the theory lead to discussion or deep thought by others?
Even if all wrong, proving the all wrongs may open a window where only locked doors appeared.

It is this above all Failure and the strive and hunger of man to progress and advance that has brought us here.

This review reminds me of the map makers telling Columbus he was wrong. Yes he was and so were they, but still he moved forward and a discovery was made.

Perhaps 0 merit or value should be given to the review.

Right or wrong George keep moving forward. That is how progress is made!

JIMIRD.......

As i said to one point, when the system relates scalar and proper forms, D goes to -D, and hence the normal way of math is abandoned in this respect.

All things are products of time and velocity. Equivalency means that all things through all dimensions are products of time and velocity held together by a math or matrix and related as scalar, (additive), proper (multiplicative) within various dimensions connected through states of resonance and induction. Space is made from loops of a velocity and time matrix, woven together with properties almost like a fluid. The geometry, compression, and configuration of this through multiple dimensions of inductive states through dipole action result in a continuous continuum that is multidimensional. So therefore the atom is the perfect Trans dimensional model, exhibiting all states and transitions of the matrix or space, so there is no distinguishing between the cores or the space. The particle is merely the overlapping of the matrix in nodes of interference. The centres of all particles are the singularities, of the boundaries that go from the interval to infinity. One of the controls is the number pi. The motion of these various dimensional or resonant states act together one relating to another. So therefore the entire system of space and particle is an inertial field or matrix. All these relationship at the smallest level are products of time and velocity. So then the idea of mass, particularity used to define force and energy, are arbitrary assignments. Since the smallest denominator has nothing to do with mass directly, and the defining of systems of ether and atomic states in terms of a larger configuration or "energy" in joules is not periodic, meaning not in system of the assignment of parts and properties as we have in a periodic table of chemistry. If we redefine all properties as arising from three units, to include v and t, then the associated properties are an adjunct to the real structure, and that v or t is the energy (new word) that is in all things, and particles associated with various states. The Higgs is more a test of the system of units, the defining of mass, than the finding of a particle.

The evaluation of all particles in terms of mass and energy is linear and not periodic. Mass is a higher periodic state than velocity and time which are at the bottom. v and t as the basics and through the periodic development of v and t we finally get the effect of mass. Therefore to evaluate those things which arise out of more simple relationships of vt, such as mass less particles, with something much more evolved, such as mass, is not providing the clarity to the structure of the real universe.

all the universe is, is transformation in velocity. Time is also a velocity, inverted of course. Energy and its mathematical description and use needs to have a new definition for the future of physics.

Our definitions should only be by v and t, and by arrangement associate properties, almost like a periodic table of chemistry. so then we say this configuration is mass, or we might even revise our use of the property mass. various energy states can be described by resonant action D, related to v and T. various resonant states multiply together to generates other state properties. The geometry and compression of dimension of these states or matrix also give rise to other properties.
V + T = D = 1 (scalar), this derives quadratic forms and polynomials
V X T = = -D = -1 (proper)

that comes from

phi + phihat = 1
phi X phihat = -1

phi is the golden mean and phihat is 1/phi

time and velocity are the same energy polarized and inverted, and together form resonant activity D

below this periodic triad is a binary code of 1 and 0

pi controls all activities of time and velocity and is also responsible for the fine structure constant and creation of all numbers

everything is made from time and velocity, particles are merely the interference patterns of those matrices.

the search for higgs is more about units than particles, since mass is purely arbitrary, an assignment to understand energy and force. mass = D^3T^2 = V^3T^5, which shows by our definition mass to be asymmetrical. so what particle perhaps is associated with this asymmetrical definition? maybe the reason its so hard to find, and maybe the definition is not attached to any particle.

we can most definitely time travel, and accelerate or decelerate time. we can antigravity, for example, D is resonant space. 1/D is reverse resonant ether space or reverse polarity, and that can be accomplished by arcsine and/or cosecant waves which reverse polarity of sine wave normal resonant activity. it is the ether that allows this to happen, merely the extension of space of a trans dimensional atom. the gravity works opposite elctromagnetism, where more mass is more voltage and current in the ether because of the -1 or -D. gravity in the ether is merely the acceleration of coupling and superposition of the ether.

we can take the trans-dimensional model and also induce current from the ether by a photonic transformer, realizing that all states are inductive due to dipole action, we can step up the activity of the etherr to a dimensional state to induce current.

we can teleport. since all space is connected, we can through resonance, imitate the matrix of what is to be teleported elsewhere and the object will reappear far away. this would be ackin to telepathic activity.

we can hyperspace travel and get across the galaxy at C^2 or C^3 without adjusting time.

different particles are associated with different dimensional states. so it is incorrect to use joules or D^5 to examine particles that are associated with lower dimensional forms where mass disappears. the word energy needs to be redefined into time and velocity. you can take any equations and convert or rewrite it in terms of v and t. you only needs three units d, t, and v. the current system of units is like the Japanese kanji of symbols and does not have the periodicity or periodic table that represents the true structure of what is being examined, pattern of nature. so then by examining all nature through a specific form rather than its true pattern, you get all kinds of contradictions, even to the point of thinking that energy is everything, but your definition is only one form, and not even a small form.

when you look at an atom, mass is only a small percentage of what can be measured, but for you, its useful to define energy and force. obviously if it works use it, but that isnt the complete structure of nature, and mass is purely arbitrary since its only given meaning to other definitions that are useful to you. if i were to say that everything is time and velocity, within your system of measurement it seems to go beyond, but also include much more. so theefore then, having a system that is not complete, analysiing in terems of joules and newton meters, is going to keave a lot out of the picture, since its not a periodic system that defines enegy even at the utmost smallest level, you get these ideas if masslessness in particles, etc. but then if you have the periodicity and pattern of nature, it applies to all states, and nothing is without, only comprised of smaller arrangement of the same smaller forms, v and t.

C describes the maximum extension of the entire system of the inertial field of localized space

D^5 = mc^2, calculate D radius for the maximum volume of an inertial system. what an equation means depends on how you define the variables in the equation. We call them constants, but in fact are variables. anything with units is a variable. in the schwarzchild radius we introduce G with a number, and hence changes the relationship to a different scale, but the equation is the same.
mass can be broken down further, mass = D^3T^2 = V^3T^5
you can say energy is equivalent to the products of time and velocity
mass as a definition is arbitrary, but everything is a product of time and velocity

Energy = D^5 = mc^2 = D^3T^3V^2 = V^5T^5
as we see, energy is a vector
energy as joules is the product of velocity and time

E = C^5T^5 energy is equivalent with time

when you talk about mass energy equivalence, it brings to mind a greater question, the equivalence that provides a unfied field untiting all concepts in physics. i say to you all properties in physics are products of velocity and time. C is a speacial case of the maximum extension of that field of resonance. but the equation is qrong, since equivalency has to do with that energy which explains all states, and that equivalncy is not limited to one condition, but to many. the idea of C was only one idea in this respect. and i can show that mass is really the product of more variables of velocity and time, arbitrarily chosen only to define what you know to be force and energy. since c does not explain a unified field, it does not explain mass and energy equivalence. it is merely a constant and combioned with mass isa product that defines energy useful to us by meaurements. energy as defined in joules is not the smallest property to define anything since it can further be sudivided and can be explained as the product of velocity and time. the idea of an energy whose products accounts for all properties via a periodic structure that represents the real form of nature is v and t, together forming d of a resonant system. what is equivalent desribes all forms and equations. the idea of mass energy equivalence is misleading because from it there isn't the simplicity or explanation of a unification of physics. energy involves the accelration of density and volume of the inertial field
E = Volume x Acceleration^2 x Density ^2, breaking down equivalncy to time and velocity allows the true equivalency of all concepts. Equivalency is infnite, and what we see in this one equation of mc^2 is only a speacial case where by it, we have incorrectly assigned energy as the smallest denominator in assessing all measurements, when in fact its high on the list being product.