<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  

LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 14 2017 at 3:29 AM
Pentcho Valev 

 
LIGO fraud exposed:

"Now a team of independent physicists has sifted through this data, only to find what they describe as strange correlations that shouldn't be there. The team, led by Andrew Jackson, a physicist at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, claims that the troublesome signal could be significant enough to call the entire discovery into question. The potential effects of the unexplained correlations "could range from a minor modification of the extracted wave form to a total rejection of LIGO's claimed [gravitational wave] discovery," wrote Jackson in an email to Quanta. LIGO representatives say there may well be some unexplained correlations, but that they should not affect the team's conclusions. [...] The main claim of Jackson's team is that there appears to be correlated noise in the detectors at the time of the gravitational-wave signal. This might mean that, at worst, the gravitational-wave signal might not have been a true signal at all, but just louder noise." https://www.quantamagazine.org/strange-noise-in-gravitational-wave-data-sparks-debate-20170630/

The noise correlation can only be an artifact - LIGO conspirators faked both signal and noise but forgot to uncorrelate the noise:

"Einstein believed in neither gravitational waves nor black holes. [...] Dr Natalia Kiriushcheva, a theoretical and computational physicist at the University of Western Ontario (UWO), Canada, says that while it was Einstein who initiated the gravitational waves theory in a paper in June 1916, it was an addendum to his theory of general relativity and by 1936, he had concluded that such things did not exist. Furthermore - as a paper published by Einstein in the Annals of Mathematics in October, 1939 made clear, he also rejected the possibility of black holes. [...] On September 16, 2010, a false signal - a so-called "blind injection" - was fed into both the Ligo and Virgo systems as part of an exercise to "test ... detection capabilities". At the time, the vast majority of the hundreds of scientists working on the equipment had no idea that they were being fed a dummy signal. The truth was not revealed until March the following year, by which time several papers about the supposed sensational discovery of gravitational waves were poised for publication. "While the scientists were disappointed that the discovery was not real, the success of the analysis was a compelling demonstration of the collaboration's readiness to detect gravitational waves," Ligo reported at the time. But take a look at the visualisation of the faked signal, says Dr Kiriushcheva, and compare it to the image apparently showing the collision of the twin black holes, seen on the second page of the recently-published discovery paper. "They look very, very similar," she says. "It means that they knew exactly what they wanted to get and this is suspicious for us: when you know what you want to get from science, usually you can get it." The apparent similarity is more curious because the faked event purported to show not a collision between two black holes, but the gravitational waves created by a neutron star spiralling into a black hole. The signals appear so similar, in fact, that Dr Kiriushcheva questions whether the "true" signal might actually have been an echo of the fake, "stored in the computer system from when they turned off the equipment five years before"." http://www.thenational.ae/arts-life/the-review/why-albert-einstein-continues-to-make-waves-as-black-holes-collide#full

Yet in Einstein's schizophrenic world fraud is inspirational. Old profiteer Roger Penrose immediately adapted LIGO fraud to his idiotic (much more idiotic than Einstein's) theories:

Correlated "noise" in LIGO gravitational wave signals: an implication of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, by Roger Penrose, Mathematical Institute, Oxford, UK https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1707/1707.04169.pdf

Pentcho Valev

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Amigo

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 14 2017, 4:21 PM 


>>>Now a team of independent physicists has sifted through this data, only to find what they describe as strange correlations that shouldn't be there. The team, led by Andrew Jackson, a physicist at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen, claims that the troublesome signal could be significant enough to call the entire discovery into question.

The smartest strategic MOVE LIGO team made to ensure the GWs is here to stay was to recruit over 1000 workers in this field ready to defend their finding all the time against critics such as Andrew Jackson and his people whether it was really true or not -https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/63440/what-is-the-point-of-listing-1000-authors-for-a-single-scientific-paper




 
 
jaquecusto

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 14 2017, 7:12 PM 

[linked image]

Ligo TEAM

 
 
Anonymous

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 15 2017, 6:18 PM 

>>>>The smartest strategic MOVE LIGO team made to ensure the GWs is here to stay was to recruit over 1000 workers..

very smart move

 
 
Heisenberg, top of iceberg

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 15 2017, 7:25 PM 

Yet in Einstein's schizophrenic world fraud is inspirational. Old profiteer Roger Penrose immediately adapted LIGO fraud to his idiotic (much more idiotic than Einstein's) theories:

[linked image]

 
 
Anonymous

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 16 2017, 1:24 PM 

smart move

 
 
Pentcho Valev

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 19 2017, 1:31 PM 

Even Einsteinians now scorn LIGO fraudsters:

Sabine Hossenfelder: "A Danish group of researchers begs to differ. They recently published a criticism on the arXiv in which they complain that after subtracting the signal of the first gravitational wave event, correlations remain at the same time-delay as the signal. That clearly shouldn't happen. First and foremost it would demonstrate a sloppy signal extraction by the LIGO collaboration. A reply to the Danes' criticism by Ian Harry from the LIGO collaboration quickly appeared on Sean Carroll's blog. Ian pointed out some supposed mistakes in the Danish group's paper. Turns out though, the mistake was on his site. Once corrected, Harry's analysis reproduces the correlations which shouldn't be there. Bummer. Ian Harry did not respond to my requests for comment. Neither did Alessandra Buonanno from the LIGO collaboration, who was also acknowledged by the Danish group. David Shoemaker, the current LIGO spokesperson, let me know he has "full confidence" in the results, and also, the collaboration is working on a reply, which might however take several months to appear. In other words, go away, there's nothing to see here." http://backreaction.blogspot.bg/2017/07/penrose-claims-ligo-noise-is-evidence.html

Pentcho Valev

 
 
Pentcho Valev

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 20 2017, 8:02 AM 

Einstein's schizophrenic world is an incredible place. Any authors different from LIGO conspirators claiming to have detected some signal would be in serious trouble if noise obeys the same correlation as the signal - their paper would be rejected without going to peer-review. In contrast, LIGO conspirators have already been given millions and the Nobel prize is coming:

https://dreamheron.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/ligo_fraud_take.jpg

And the height of idiocy ("Einstein's OLIGOPHRENIC world" is a more suitable name):

"Penrose claims LIGO noise is evidence for Cyclic Cosmology. Noise is the physicists' biggest enemy. Unless you are a theorist whose pet idea masquerades as noise. Then you are best friends with noise. Like Roger Penrose." http://backreaction.blogspot.bg/2017/07/penrose-claims-ligo-noise-is-evidence.html

Pentcho Valev

 
 
Heisenberg, top of iceberg

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 20 2017, 7:22 PM 


 
 
Pentcho Valev

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 21 2017, 6:48 AM 

LIGO story is getting too criminal:

http://backreaction.blogspot.bg/2017/07/penrose-claims-ligo-noise-is-evidence.html
George Rush: "They're simply not checking for any time-correlated (between Hanford and Livingston) noise. Conclusion reinforced by fact they didn't notice the correlations reported by Danes. Plus, at first Ian Harry had mistakes, so appears the whole idea was new to him, and to LIGO analysts."

Unknown: "@George you should be careful before asserting things that the LSC does or does not: "They're simply not checking for any time-correlated (between Hanford and Livingston) noise."

Obviously, you haven't followed the literature enough... Check the paper above: "In this Letter, we report on the search for an isotropic background using data from Advanced LIGO's first observing run O1. We search for the background by cross-correlating data streams from the two separate LIGO detectors and looking for a coherent signal. We find no evidence for the background and place the best upper limits to date on the energy density of the background in the LIGO frequency band. We also update the implications for a BBH background using all the data from O1." [end of quotation]

LIGO story was criminal from the very beginning but in Einstein's schizophrenic world this is called "science". The following C.S.I. activity for instance is science par excellence and LIGO conspirators are proud of it:

"I can tell you about Alan Weinstein's reaction, and he's a professor here at Caltech who works on the LIGO experiment. He said when they got the phone calls they were all incredulous because they couldn't believe that it was real. They've been looking for gravitational waves for decades. He said at first he thought that it was a blind injection, that someone had put in a signal and they didn't know about it and so they thought that they were going to have to go through this whole rigmarole again, to find out that at the end of the day it was a hardware injection. Then they thought that maybe it was double blind because no one seemed to know what was going on. Whoever did the injection didn't tell anyone, and this is going to be a big secret, and then eventually it's not going to be a real signal. But then everyone swore that they hadn't done any injections, and so they were starting to think, "oh my gosh, maybe this is real!" And then Alan thought maybe it was a triple blind experiment, and that just means it's a malicious hacker who somehow managed to erase all of their steps and get the perfect gravitational wave signal in the mirror, and then will announce that they've somehow engineered this in a few months, and embarrass the collaboration. But he also claims that a binary black hole merger is much more likely than someone with that level of computer hacking power who is interested in hacking LIGO." http://nautil.us/issue/34/adaptation/the-gravity-wave-hunter

"Rai said, "Look, we went through every possible scenario for how you would inject a false signal, and tried to do it ourselves." There were only a few people in the entire collaboration with sufficient access and knowledge to do something like that, and they interrogated them all. And you have to physically attach stuff, you can't just do this telepathically, so they looked for little black boxes and things like that. It was like a C.S.I. experiment. So there's no physical evidence. It would be very hard to fake a signal without being caught. And I don't think anyone in the collaboration has that sophisticated a criminal mind. In fact, when they did a [deliberate] blind injection during the test run [of the earlier version of LIGO], they screwed it up a little. They got the orientation wrong."
http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2016/04/black-hole-blues-gives-a-ringside-seat-to-discovery-of-gravitational-waves/

So in 2010 LIGO conspirators still did not have "that sophisticated a criminal mind" and "screwed it up a little". But that was the dress rehearsal which was nevertheless quite successful. "A select few expert administrators" deceived everybody, misled astronomers into wasting time and money on the fake, and "this became particularly useful starting in September 2015":

"...a blind injection test where only a select few expert administrators are able to put a fake signal in the data, maintaining strict confidentiality. They did just that in the early morning hours of 16 September 2010. Automated data analyses alerted us to an extraordinary event within eight minutes of data collection, and within 45 minutes we had our astronomer colleagues with optical telescopes imaging the area we estimated the gravitational wave to have come from. Since it came from the direction of the Canis Major constellation, this event picked up the nickname of the "Big Dog Event". For months we worked on vetting this candidate gravitational wave detection, extracting parameters that described the source, and even wrote a paper. Finally, at the next collaboration meeting, after all the work had been cataloged and we voted unanimously to publish the paper the next day. However, it was revealed immediately after the vote to be an injection and that our estimated parameters for the simulated source were accurate. Again, there was no detection, but we learned a great deal about our abilities to know when we detected a gravitational wave and that we can do science with the data. This became particularly useful starting in September 2015." https://www.researchgate.net/blog/post/a-null-result-is-not-a-failure

Pentcho Valev

 
 
Pentcho Valev

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 21 2017, 1:04 PM 

"LIGO and Virgo Collaborations preparing a brief guide to LIGO detector noise and extraction of gravitational-wave signals" https://article.wn.com/view/2017/07/20/LIGO_and_Virgo_Collaborations_preparing_a_brief_guide_to_LIG/

Incredible! They didn't know about the noise correlation - which means that the published details about the gravitational events are all fake - and now they are going to teach the world about "extraction of gravitational-wave signals"! But LIGO fraudsters are in a desperate situation - what else can they do?

Pentcho Valev

 
 
Pentcho Valev

Re: LIGO Fraud Inspires Old Einsteinians

July 22 2017, 3:20 PM 

Natalia Kiriushcheva was too critical of LIGO conspirators and became an unperson (Sabine Hossenfelder is much more prudent but she may also become an unperson - LIGO conspirators are powerful people):

https://gravityattraction.wordpress.com/
Gravity Attraction: Sergei Kuzmin, Natalia Kiriushcheva

http://www.thenational.ae/arts-life/the-review/why-albert-einstein-continues-to-make-waves-as-black-holes-collide#full
"Einstein believed in neither gravitational waves nor black holes. [...] Dr Natalia Kiriushcheva, a theoretical and computational physicist at the University of Western Ontario (UWO), Canada, says that while it was Einstein who initiated the gravitational waves theory in a paper in June 1916, it was an addendum to his theory of general relativity and by 1936, he had concluded that such things did not exist. Furthermore - as a paper published by Einstein in the Annals of Mathematics in October, 1939 made clear, he also rejected the possibility of black holes. [...] On September 16, 2010, a false signal - a so-called "blind injection" - was fed into both the Ligo and Virgo systems as part of an exercise to "test ... detection capabilities". At the time, the vast majority of the hundreds of scientists working on the equipment had no idea that they were being fed a dummy signal. The truth was not revealed until March the following year, by which time several papers about the supposed sensational discovery of gravitational waves were poised for publication. "While the scientists were disappointed that the discovery was not real, the success of the analysis was a compelling demonstration of the collaboration's readiness to detect gravitational waves," Ligo reported at the time. But take a look at the visualisation of the faked signal, says Dr Kiriushcheva, and compare it to the image apparently showing the collision of the twin black holes, seen on the second page of the recently-published discovery paper. "They look very, very similar," she says. "It means that they knew exactly what they wanted to get and this is suspicious for us: when you know what you want to get from science, usually you can get it." The apparent similarity is more curious because the faked event purported to show not a collision between two black holes, but the gravitational waves created by a neutron star spiralling into a black hole. The signals appear so similar, in fact, that Dr Kiriushcheva questions whether the "true" signal might actually have been an echo of the fake, "stored in the computer system from when they turned off the equipment five years before"."

http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/o/orwell/george/o79n/chapter1.4.html
"Withers, however, was already an unperson. He did not exist : he had never existed."

Pentcho Valev

 
 
 
  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Forum  
 Copyright © 1999-2017 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement