Since you believe that you have debunked evolution, you still haven't given us a better alternative. So that means that we are left with the default that currently makes the most sense, evolution. It seems that your work is actually worthless, since you haven't proposed a better theory.
So why don't you do so. Tell us what your replacement for evolution is. Don't forget to present some initial evidence for discussion and questioning. Please tell us where your theory was published, how it was developed, what experiments were performed, and some predictions that are a consequence of said theory.
You see, unless you can furnish something better, the old theory stands. It's a bit like Newton's theory of gravitation. Even with recognized problems, it wasn't just cast aside until a replacement had been developed. In fact, Newton's theory of gravitation has twice been falsified and has become a special case in each of the two new theories. (The problem is that neither new theory agrees with the other.)
So evolution is and will remain the reigning paradigm until you are able to present an alternative that explains everything that evolutionary theory explains, and do it better.