I read the silly 29 Evidences For Macroevolution at Talk Origins.
I could have simply regurgitated it, but then I did a little checking and looked at the references.
Dawkins, Gould, Eldredge, and about 50 references all done, peer reviewed, and "researched" by evolutionists themselves!!:):)
29 Evidences For Macroevolution is worth about as much as the few pieces of blank paper needed to make a copy of it:)
Shall I find a "29 Evidences For Astrology" type of article? Im sure all the references would be from astrologers, peer reviewed by astrologers, and researched by astrologers:)
Its like Boss Hogg saying "here's 29 pieces of evidence this guy is guilty". Ya, that's nice until we get to the nitty gritty and find out all pieces of evidence came from his staff and supporters:)