You are trying to defy simple logic with, rather, emotinal arguments. My argument shows through logic ( 1+1 = 2 ) that this is the way it has to be ( 1+1 has to be 2) IF we assume that the universe is surrounded by nothing.
I fear you simply did not "understand" what I wrote, which is sad, because you desperately attack single paragraphs and repeat stupid crap over and over again when shown that it is false under the condition that the universe is surrounded by nothing.
See, now you are stuck in the mud. If god is infinite, then I have shown that he simply could NOT HAVE created the universe and that is the way it has to be whether you like it or not. If god is finite, then you must also accept the fact that he had to be created at some point, whether you like it or not.
The best defense for you right now, is to think over the definition of characteristics you blindly stamp god with, such as "omnipotent" "infinite", and revise them.