How embarassing for you Vendy

by Miguel

 
VENDER:
"Than the moon should just be full of eggs, just ready to hatch so life can get started on the moon. Oh noes...... no air on the moon?"

What?
The Moon?

VENDER:
"OH.... how funny.... so Earth just so happens to have a bunch of eggs laying around ready to hatch and it just so happens that Earth had air."


Um...who ever said there were a "bunch of eggs laying around ready to hatch..."??

Oh that's right...you just did.
LOL

Here's a clue Vendy:

- the Earth was formed about 4.54 billion years ago
- the oceans began forming about 4.2 billion years ago
- the earliest life (bacteria) can be traced back to 3.5 - 3.8 billion years ago
- for 2 billion years multi-layered microbial mats were the dominant life. With the evolution of
oxygenic photosynthesis the atmosphere became laden with oxygen about 2.400 billion years ago
- about 1.85 billion years ago the first eukaryotic cells (those with organelles - look it up)
developed.
- 1.7 billion years ago the first multicellular eukaryotic organisms evolve
- 488 million years ago the first vertebrate life evolved
- ancestors of terrestrial vertebrates appeared approximately 370 million years ago. During the next
10-15 million years the first terrestrial vertebrates evolve.
- 340 million years ago the first amniotic tetrapods evolve.

So your attempt at a carricature is proved to be rather lacking in logic and even just common sense as well as being born out of a deep-seated contented ignorance.

But what else can we ecpect from a person who insists that insects and lobsters are not animals?

VENDER:
"what are the odds of that?
Eggs and air?????"

Odds? For amniotic eggs to appear ex nihilo I would say quite a bit, especially on the surface of an atmosphereless planet lol.
However for eggs to evolve once life began? I would say that their inevitability (or at least a similar analog) was obvious.

VENDER:
"...and they try to tell me that evoluiton is for grownups. LoL"

Well science is for those who are educated anyway.

Sadly even young children have a better basic grasp of science than you have demonstrated.




Posted on Feb 27, 2009, 7:37 PM

Respond to this message

Goto Forum Home
Responses

Find more forums on Religion and PhilosophyCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement