Re: so John Frusciante is innocent?July 30 2005 at 12:09 AM
No score for this post
|squire (no login)|
Response to so John Frusciante is innocent?
In response to your:
"That amount that he gave him was deadly and that cant be forgiven. I feel so angry because I hear this silly stuff about "River was the one who took the drugs". Yes, but you cannot expect that the drugs are going to KILL you.
Maybe John wanted to share the speedball with River because he wanted him to overdose. Who knows. Maybe he is evil. Ok, now I'm mean, but I just cant forgive! The John who gave River the speedball and the John who makes wonderful music are two different people for me."
I'm sorry but the amount that was given to him by john frusciante was not a "deadly" amount as you say.
that in addition to everything else he took that night was the "deadly amount."
acute toxification usually refers to a strong amount of drugs and / or alcohol over a longer period of time as opposed to an overdose.
anyway, we're splitting hairs here!
the fact is that no junkie expect the drugs to kill them but hey...... guess what they do and no one is responsible for that but themselves!
the bottom line is that no one, no one was there to help him but in the end no junkie no matter what the circumstances will quit until he or she wants to quite themselves.
over all it's just a sad tale of a young life gone like so many before him and so many after him, famouse or not!!!!!!!