Women Against Gun Control 2A Educational Forum

To EDUCATE re: Our Second Amendment RIGHT - Our basic fundamental human RIGHT to defend our lives, property AND Liberty, UNINFRINGED! The Second Amendment IS the Equal Rights Amendment! *************************************************************************** Dedicated to those who died 9-11-01 The Second Amendment IS Our Homeland Security! *************************************************************************** WOMEN AGAINST GUN CONTROL SUPPORTS OUR AMERICAN TROOPS!!!!!!!!!!!! GOD BLESS YOU ALL! STAY SAFE AND COME HOME SOON! OUR DEEPEST GRATITUDE FOR YOUR SERVICE AND SACRIFICES! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Armed Citizens SAVE over 2 million lives a year ..and that INCLUDES those attackers who are ARMED with just their BARE HANDS AND FISTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Columbine Co: Where innocent children and teachers could NOT do anything against a crazed student but hide under tables and pray that they wouldn't be next What Went Wrong with Columbine http://www.newswithviews.com/Pratt/larry.htm ------------- Pearl Miss: Where an armed administrator was able to save lives by retreiving his own weapon ---------- What school would YOU prefer YOUR children attend ?????????????????????? If it only SAVES one life........ DO IT FOR THE CHILDREN! +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Racist Origins of US Gun Control http://www.lizmichael.com/racistgc.htm http://www.mcsm.org/racist.html http://hematite.com/dragon/bans.html http://www.sightm1911.com/docs/whitelaw.htm http://www.potomac-inc.org/emercore.html ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The 2nd Amendment: Explained......Very good explanation of the meaning of the 2nd Amendment: http://www.sierratimes.com/03/08/07/greenslade.htm ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ "A gun is a TOOL ! NO better or no worse than any other tool, an axe, a knife a shovel or anything - YES~ even hands and fists! A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. REMEMBER THAT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Stayin' Alive: Armed and Female in an Unsafe World

by Nancy

http://shop.wnd.com/store/item.asp?ITEM_ID=1775

The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 29, 2006, 11:21 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Churchgoer who fought terrorists explains 'Right and Duty of Self Defense'

by Nancy

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53465

The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 29, 2006, 11:21 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


'Hopefully this is going to send a message,' says police spokeswoman

by Nancy

'Hopefully this is going to send a message,' says police spokeswoman
Date: Dec 29, 2006 10:10 AM
WORLDNETDAILY - December 28, 2006
FIGHTING BACK: 3 home intruders shot dead in Albuquerque
'Hopefully this is going to send a message,' says police spokeswoman
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53542




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 29, 2006, 11:15 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


NSSF: 2007 Industry Research Directory

by Nancy

TO: Industry Partners
FROM: Chris Dolnack
Senior Vice President
SUBJECT: 2007 Industry Research Directory

I am pleased to share with you the National Shooting Sports Foundation's 2007 Industry Research Directory. You may download it in PDF format from our web site at www.nssf.org/IndustryResearch/PDF/07-IRD.pdf



The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 29, 2006, 9:05 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Gun Control: Brady Campaign Continues Hollowed Tradition

by Nancy

Gun Control: Brady Campaign Continues Hollowed Tradition
Date: Dec 29, 2006 7:09 AM
FYI (copy below):
http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=25539&catcode=13


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 29, 2006, 9:02 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Right to Arms, Self-Defense Debate a Universal Issue

by Nancy

Right to Arms, Self-Defense Debate a Universal Issue
Date: Dec 29, 2006 7:04 AM
FYI (copy below):
http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?cde4e557-3773-42b1-a4a6-7229688f4b8f


************************************************************
Right to Arms, Self-Defense Debate a Universal Issue
By Joseph P. Tartaro, 12/26/2006 11:31:16 PM

There is universality to the firearms and self-defense
debate that surfaces in almost every country of the world.
The debates over public policy in each country sound very
similar to those we experience in the United States.

Perhaps that is because the issues are universal: people
everywhere can debate the moral and social arguments for
arming the good people against the threat of the evil ones
who seem to be everywhere.

The British have pretty much outlawed not only guns but
self-defense and crime has skyrocketed. As a result there
are recent reports of members of Parliament who would revise
the laws in an attempt to re-balance the scales in the
battle between good and evil. It may not happen very soon,
but the debate in Britain is shifting back to serious
discussions about establishing some rules to allow people to
defend themselves against the criminals who ignore all laws.
In Canada, the debate which was once closed has also
reopened.

The debate continues. It doesn’t seem to matter if it is
about allowing the residents of Washington, DC, to have
loaded guns in their homes for defense against the predatory
criminals who prey on everyone in the national capital, or
about the people in some foreign country.

For example, The Manila Times in the Philippines reported at
the end of November that businessmen in that country are
opposed to a proposed ban on firearms for the protection of
private citizens and shopkeepers.

The newspaper reported that Sen. Aquilino Pimentel Jr.
recently proposed a gun ban, saying the availability of guns
has greatly contributed to that nation’s crime wave.

He also rejected the reasoning that criminality will be
prevented by allowing the ordinary civilians to possess and
carry their licensed firearms.

Arming civilian volunteers would increase the number of guns
in the hands of the unscrupulous ones, he explained, in an
argument that is very familiar to Americans.

But The Times reported a group of “landed businessmen,” led
by Andy Feria, who claims to represent responsible
gunowners, say that depriving them of guns would make them
defenseless in the face of criminalities and terrorism.

Feria said crime and terrorist activities are a daily
occurrence in the cities, provinces and towns of the
Philippines, despite the low volume of guns and other
firearms in the hands of the citizens.

He said Pimentel is not in touch with reality, giving false
hopes that the police would be there on the streets and
residences to give security and protection 24 hours a day, 7
days a week.

“The police are not personal body guards. Rather, they act
as general deterrents to crimes by their presence and by
apprehending criminals after the fact. They have no legal
obligation to protect anyone in particular,” he said.

Sound familiar? Citing government records, Feria said the
police to population ratio is 1 to 715 on the actual
Philippine National Police strength of 114,881, considering
some are assigned to clerical work.

“Civilians, therefore, are aware that the response time of
the police usually takes a few minutes, if not hours, while
an intruder in a house can reach their victim in seconds,”
he said.

Feria also debunked Pimentel’s proposal to ban carrying of
firearms outside of residences. He said that as of 2006, 35
states (sic) and a majority of “civilized” Americans live in
“right-to-carry” states, and in each, the crime rates fell
after the law became active. States that disallow the
carrying of firearms outside of residences, in contrast,
have crime rates of 11% higher than the national average.

He noted that in America, an estimated 60 to 85 million
households own a firearm. Every year, people in the United
States use a gun to defend themselves against criminals at
an estimated 2.5 million times—more than 6,500 people a day,
or once in every 13 seconds.

“Firearms are used 60 times more often to protect lives than
to take lives. Often times, the gun is never fired and no
blood (including the criminal’s) is shed. For every
accidental death, suicide or homicide with firearms, 10
lives are saved through defensive use,” Feria added.

He also said, according to The Manila Times, that European
“civilized” countries like Switzerland have some of the
lowest murder rates in the world, and it requires all
able-bodied males between the ages of 20 and 50 to have a
military-issued automatic weapon, ammunition and other
equipment in their dwellings.

Feria said a gun ban is not a guarantee that terrorists and
criminals will cease from harming civilians, adding, “These
people live by violence and cannot live without guns.”

Whether in the US, the Pacific Rim, South America, Africa,
Europe or India, the argument is almost the same and the
selective reporting and coloring of news reports is reflect
in the arguments.

For example, some recent crime reports from Atlanta, GA-area
TV stations focused on an all too common self-defense
shooting. However, the headline reflected some of the bias
against self-defense.

“Pizza delivery driver kills teenager,” was the headline.
Here’s the rest of the story from WXIA and KSDK:

“A pizza delivery man says he feared for his life when he
shot and killed an Atlanta teenager on Sunday night (Nov.
26).

“The delivery man says the teen and two others robbed and
threatened to shoot him when he went to make a delivery at
the Huntingwood Point Apartments off Campbellton Road in
southwest Atlanta.

“Zahid Mahmood says this is the third time he has been
robbed while delivering pizzas for Super Crown Pizza. The
first time in 2004, he says he was pistol-whipped by the
robber. The second time he says he was ambushed in June
2006.

“The 44-year-old Mahmood has a state license that allows him
to carry a handgun. He says he has had the gun for years,
but says Sunday night was the first time he had ever used
his weapon.

“He says he was walking back to his car after dropping off a
pizza at an apartment, when three young men approached him,
demanded his money and car keys, and ordered him to walk
away.

“Mahmood says he did what they told him, but he says that
wasn’t enough. He says one of them followed him, and
insisted he hand over his cell phone. He says that at that
point, he thought his life was on the line.

“ ‘He was posing under his jacket like a gun,’ Mahmood said.
‘He showed me and said that he would shoot me if won’t give
him my cell phone. I said, “Okay, hold on, I’ll give you my
cell phone.” And I grabbed my gun and instead of my cell
phone, I pulled my gun out, and then I shot—just to hurt
him, that he could get away from there.’ ”

“Mahmood says he fired a total of three shots, one of which
hit and killed 14-year-old Kenyatta Calhoun. The other two
young men at the scene got away, according to police.

“Police have referred the case to the Fulton County District
Attorney’s office, so prosecutors can decide whether or not
to file any charges against Mahmood, who insists he acted in
self-defense,” the news reports concluded.

What will happen to Mahmood in the future remains to be
seen. But the fact that the he had been robbed and beaten
in the past and his life was threatened by three street
thugs is more important than the fact that one of the thugs
who was 14 years old had his criminal career cut short. The
media’s focus on the fact that he was 14 is just another way
of coloring the universal debate.

Joseph P. Tartaro is the Executive Editor of Gun Week
magazine. See more columns at http://ww.gunweek.com


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 29, 2006, 8:59 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Illinois: Was Chicago's Gun Control Ordinance A Secret Plan By Chicago's Mob?

by Nancy


Illinois: Was Chicago's Gun Control Ordinance A Secret Plan By Chicago's Mob?
Steve Bartin
newsalert
July 14, 2006
http://tinyurl.com/yfocn5


According to articles collected by Mr. Bartin, "...a 'made member' of the Mob was a powerful Alderman working to disarm honest citizens while his criminal conspirators had no intention of disarming."


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:39 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Book Review: A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control

by Nancy

Book Review: A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America
David Hardy
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
Vol. 15, No. 4, 2007
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=947334


Mr. Hardy indicates the ways in which Professor Saul Cornell's recent book, A Well-Regulated Militia, failed to understand the other component of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.





The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:38 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


A VPC Lie Exposed...Again

by Nancy

A VPC Lie Exposed...Again
Pro-Gun Progessive
November 1, 2006

http://progunprogressive.com/?p=250


Josh Sugarman's claim that 1 in 5 police officers slain in 2005 were killed with 'Assault weapons' does not withstand scrutiny. More officers were slain by intentional ramming with vehicles. The comments on this site are provocative.





The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !



    
This message has been edited by WAGCEVP on Dec 28, 2006 7:40 PM

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:39 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


School Safety

by Nancy

School Safety
Armed First Responders are Needed in Schools
Fred Willoughby
Deseret News (UT)
December 17, 2006
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650215354,00.html


"First responders are the people already at the scene, such as school officials. First responders do have the element of surprise. This is very important in shooting incidents."



Nevada State Senator Proposes Letting Teachers Carry Guns
Associated Press (NV)
December 14, 2006
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/nevada/2006/dec/14/121410214.html


"I would expect enough teachers would be interested so it would serve as a deterrent," said Sen. Bob Beers, R-Las Vegas. He said he's preparing a bill to introduce when state lawmakers convene in February."



School fits gun education into sixth grade curriculum
Dan Joling
Associated Press (AK)
November 17, 2006
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/11/18/news/state/18_39_4911_17_06.txt


"'What we're trying to do is mitigate the onslaught of very bad habits that cause needless deaths and needless accidents,' Coate said.


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:37 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Ireland: Dublin Jury Acquits Irish Farmer for Fatally Shooting Burglar in Back

by Nancy

Ireland
Dublin Jury Acquits Irish Farmer for Fatally Shooting Burglar in Back
Shawn Pogatchnik
Associated Press (Ireland)
December 14, 2006
http://tinyurl.com/ybyere


"A Dublin jury acquitted a farmer Thursday who fatally shot a burglar in the back -- a case that attracted national attention because the slain man was a member of Ireland's gypsy minority."



Irish Homeowners Should be Allowed to Kill Intruders in Order to Defend their Family and Property
Firstrung (UK)
November 21, 2006
http://tinyurl.com/yfappo


"The long-awaited consultation paper by the Irish government-appointed legal watchdog on legitimate defence has called for the introduction of new laws to safeguard homeowners who are confronted by violent intruders."




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:35 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


New Zealand: Protest in Support of Gun shop Shooting

by Nancy

New Zealand
Protest in Support of Gun shop Shooting
Press Release from the Sensible Sentencing Trust
Scoop Media Limited (New Zealand)
December 4, 2006
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0612/S00037.htm


"Greg Carvell did what any citizen in the same circumstances should legally be able to do when faced with an intruder yelling 'Give me the guns or I'll kill you.' He shot him!"


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:35 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


The Debate is Not Yet Over

by Nancy

The Debate is Not Yet Over
Clive Edwards
Enter Stage Right
November 20, 2006
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1106/1106debatenotover.htm


"It is worth noting that over the course of the gun control debate in Canada the emphasis has shifted from 'sporting use' and 'hunting' as valid reasons for owning firearms to 'personal protection'."


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:33 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Albion Tourgee and the Second Amendment

by Nancy

Albion Tourgee and the Second Amendment
The Volokh Conspiracy
December 4, 2006
http://tinyurl.com/yh4fvw


"Tourgee's book about the Ku Klux Klan explained that during the 1870s, in Southern areas where the black militias lost and the Klan or other white groups took control, 'Almost universally the first thing done was to disarm the negroes and leave them defenseless.'"


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:32 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


U.N. To World: You Have No Human Right to Self-Defense

by Nancy

U.N. To World: You Have No Human Right to Self-Defense
America's First Freedom
November 2006
http://www.davekopel.com/2A/Foreign/UN-To-World.htm


"Thwarted by the demise of its global gun ban treaty, the United Nations declares the human right of self-defense null and void."



The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:32 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Global Gun Prohibition Lobby: Ban Arms Sales to Israel

by Nancy

Global Gun Prohibition Lobby: Ban Arms Sales to Israel
The Volokh Conspiracy
October 17, 2006
http://tinyurl.com/y6yrt4


Unable to force a blanket small-arms ban, the Control Arms affiliate of the UN's failed effort to impose global gun law recommends that military supplies no longer be exported to Israel, which has 'unlawfully killed' Palestinians.


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:33 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Danger Evident in Posing Mandatory Gun Storage Laws

by Nancy

Danger Evident in Posing Mandatory Gun Storage Laws
Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Editorial: Equal Time
November 8, 2006
http://www.ajc.com/opinion/content/opinion/stories/2006/11/07/1108edequal.html




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:31 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Off Target. A 1989 College Shooting in Montreal Incited a $2 Billion Canadian Long Gun Reg

by Nancy

Off Target. A 1989 College Shooting in Montreal Incited a $2 Billion Canadian Long Gun Registry
America's First Freedom
December 2006
http://www.davekopel.com/2A/Foreign/Off-target.htm


Seventeen years later, another Montreal college shooting mocks the failed registry.


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:31 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Dave Kopel on C-Span: Moderated Debate

by Nancy

Dave on C-Span: Moderated Debate
The Denver Press Club
C-Span Archives
November 15, 2006
http://tinyurl.com/y6tsme

http://tinyurl.com/ycyfdq


The Denver Press Club hosts a debate on the issue of gun control. Arnold Grossman, author of "One Nation Under Guns - An Essay on An American Epidemic," argues the pro-gun control case while David Kopel, co-editor of "Gun Control and Gun Rights: A Reader and Guide" speaks for the opposing side. The debate is moderated by Cynthia Hessin, executive producer of Rocky Mountain PBS. Arnold Grossman co-founded SAFE Colorado, a bipartisan anti-gun violence group, in 2000, following the Columbine school shootings. Mr. Grossman co-authored "1998" with former Colorado governor Richard Lamm. You can watch a replay of the debate in Quicktime http://tinyurl.com/y6tsme or in WMV format. For more there is Dave's book review of One Nation Under Guns: an Essay on an American Epidemic by Arnie Grossman. Kopel's lengthy review of a book riddled with factual and legal errors, and which, unintentionally, reveals why the gun control movement in the United States has become such a failure in recent years. http://tinyurl.com/ycyfdq


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:30 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Why The Kyrgyz, and Not Us (FW: SRA - Self-Defense Koncepts Ex-Soviet Style...?)?

by Nancy

Why The Kyrgyz, and Not Us (FW: SRA - Self-Defense Koncepts Ex-Soviet Style...?)?
Date: Dec 28, 2006 6:16 PM

------ Forwarded Message
From: Brad3000 <
Subject: SRA - Self-Defense Koncepts Ex-Soviet Style...?

FYI - Permit issue is for life... however long that is there.


<>Kyrgyz lawmakers vote to permit themselves to carry weapons

15.12.2006 16:39 msk
http://enews.ferghana.ru/article.php?id=1749

Kommersant

The parliament of Kyrgyzstan amended the law on the status of national
lawmakers, yesterday, and permitted them to go armed. Deputy Asamidin
Maripov told journalists that firearms would be "issued on the request
to the parliament chairman." Moreover, firearms will be issued for life
and not for the term of office. "We have to decide now what structure
will be put in charge of the issuance," Maripov said.

Two lawmakers and one election winner were assassinated in Kyrgyzstan
over the last twelve months. Another parliamentarian was murdered when
inspecting a maximum security colony.

Deputy Interior Minister Temirkan Subanov tried to dissuade the
parliament but his protestations were ignored. As far as the Interior
Ministry is concerned, it will but worsen the general state of affairs
because the underworld will certainly make use of the opportunities
presented by so many firearms in private hands.

"No foreign legislation permits senators or deputies to go armed for
purposes of self-defense," Subanov said. He said it would be better to
include additional sums in the national budget for defense of civil
servants and politicians.

According to the data compiled by the Interior Ministry, 22 lawmakers of
75 already possess firearms (some of them more than one). Prime Minister
Felix Kulov has already given the order to run a check of "all firearms
handed out as gifts and permits for them since June 1999" and to
confiscate all finagled ones. As things stand, the Interior Ministry and
other ministries and departments are too free with giving firearms away
as gifts.

Kommersant, December 15, 2006, p. 10

<snip>

================================================
Gun Control:
You have no guns... We Control YOU!
================================================

Any other views expressed herein, are my own, not bought or
sponsored in any shape or form, by or for any organization,
currently existing or not. It should be noted: the URL posted
is very likely to suddenly expire & if the reader wants to
read the full article, they should should visit the copyright
holders listed site very promptly. References & partial texts
are given for EDUCATIONAL & INFORMATIONAL purposes only
as per the "Fair Use" as described in Title-17, Sect 107 below.
----------------------------------------------------------
**COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 USC Section
107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under
fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-
profit research & educational purposes only.
[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml]



The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:28 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


SAF Inaugurates &#145;Roosevelt Courageous Woman&#146; Award=?ISO-8859-1?Q??=

by Nancy

SAF Inaugurates ‘Roosevelt Courageous Woman’ Award=?ISO-8859-1?Q??=
Date: Dec 28, 2006 3:55 PM




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


NEWS RELEASE
SAF INAUGURATES ‘ROOSEVELT COURAGEOUS WOMAN’ AWARD
BELLEVUE, WA – Recalling that the late former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt was a firm, if not outspoken, advocate of personal defense – she campaigned for civil rights in 1958 in Tennessee with a pistol on her car seat – the Second Amendment Foundation today is inaugurating a new award honoring women who use firearms in lawful defense against a criminal attack.

SAF Founder Alan M. Gottlieb announced the award’s first recipient will be a Mississippi grandmother who fatally shot a would-be robber in October. But it was Peggy Tartaro, editor of Women & Guns, the nation’s first firearms publication devoted to women, who explained the significance of the award. The magazine is owned by the foundation.

“Eleanor Roosevelt was a remarkable woman in many ways,” Ms. Tartaro said. “She was probably the first truly activist First Lady, and a firm believer in the civil rights cause. What is less known about Mrs. Roosevelt is that she was no wallflower when it came to the subject of self-reliance, and it is well documented that she often carried a handgun, even while living in the White House.

“Mrs. Roosevelt had many advantages, but unlike today’s name-brand feminists, she knew everyone – even a First Lady – was ultimately responsible for their own safety and freedom,” Tartaro continued. “That is why the Second Amendment Foundation is establishing this award in her honor and in her memory.

“I am proud to announce that the 2006 recipient is Mrs. Beth Greer of Saucier, Mississippi,” Tartaro said. “On Oct. 16, she and her husband, Tommy, were confronted by an armed robber when they returned home from their business. When a fight broke out between Tommy and gunman Bobby Hardy, Beth – thinking that her husband had been murdered after hearing a gunshot that grazed her husband’s head – retrieved her handgun from the car and shot Hardy as he emerged from the house. The robber fled with an accomplice to a nearby hospital, where he died. Mr. Greer has recovered from his wound.”

“We’ve spoken to Harrison County Sheriff George Payne,” Gottlieb added, “who said he is proud of Beth Greer and that she is doing well in the aftermath of this traumatic incident. In defending herself, this courageous lady set an example for others to follow. In the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt, Mrs. Greer demonstrated that when someone has the will and the means to fight back, they can overcome and win.”




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:27 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Toronto crime rate falls: Firearms deaths about half last year's total

by Nancy

Toronto crime rate falls: Firearms deaths about half last year's total
Date: Dec 28, 2006 9:39 AM
PUBLICATION: Montreal Gazette
DATE: 2006.12.28
EDITION: Final
SECTION: News
PAGE: A18
BYLINE: BETSY POWELL
SOURCE: Toronto Star
DATELINE: TORONTO
WORD COUNT: 584

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

After '05 Year of the Gun, Toronto crime rate falls: More arrests, but
fewer killings. Firearms deaths about half last year's total

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

When it came to fighting violent crime in Toronto this year, more was
less.

Police laid more criminal charges, made more arrests, seized more guns,
wrote more traffic tickets and had more contact with the public.

There were also more jobs aimed at helping youth while, in Ottawa, Prime
Minister Stephen Harper and the Conservatives introduced legislation to
give offenders convicted of gun crimes more time in prison.

As 2006 ends, police statistics show violent crime in Toronto,
particularly gun crime, is down from last year. Most significantly, the
number of firearm-related homicides fell dramatically, although domestic
slayings took a disturbing jump.

While there was a flare-up of pre-Christmas shootings around the city,
the number of people killed by gun violence was 28, falling well short
of last year's record 52. Overall, there have been 68 homicides to date,
while last year there were 79.

As of last Friday, there had been 199 shootings - down from 239 at the
same time last year. The number of shooting victims also declined, to
277 from 323.

But police chief Bill Blair is cautious not to claim any victories. "A
lot of those conditions that give rise to violence still exist," he
said. "We live in a big city and I think we've got to remain vigilant,
and there's no room for complacency here. There's lots of work to do in
the future."

Still, during a year-end interview in his office last week, Blair
admitted he feels "very pleased and gratified that all of that work got
results."

"I think we've been effective and restored public confidence in police
and neighbourhoods, and young people are not out of control," he said.

"We've got a lot to be thankful for. This is a very safe city relative
to others. It's not utopia, but it's a safe place and we have to work
hard to keep it that way."

Toronto is also bucking a trend evident in many major U.S. cities, where
violence has been on the rise - ironic considering Toronto police have
modelled their anti-violence strategy on the "best practices" of several
U.S. centres, including Chicago, New York and Los Angeles, Blair said.

The strategy has included targeting crime "hot spots" and a more visible
police presence in violence-hit neighbourhoods.

What is unique to Toronto, however, is the force using
anti-organized-crime legislation to attack and dismantle street gangs.

With gang members locked up, some cite the "incapacitation" of
potentially armed thugs as a reason for less gun violence this year -
but not everyone agrees.

While Toronto may have avoided a sequel to the Year of the Gun,
"incapacitation" as a long-term strategy for reducing crime "has
been
found to have very limited results," University of Ottawa professor
Cheryl Webster wrote in an email.

She is the author of a research paper titled "Limits of Justice,"
presented at Toronto Mayor David Miller's 2004 Panel on Community
Safety.

In her paper, Webster noted a growing body of research examining "the
impact on crime rates of various strategies rooted in changes in laws,
enforcement techniques, sentencing policy or correctional programming
... has found - in most cases - either nonexistent, transient or only
modest effects."

Webster said homicide rates have been relatively stable over the past 30
years. But there were two "sudden peaks" - one in 2005 and the other in
1991 - when there were 89 homicides.

"The problem with this natural tendency of extreme scores to 'regress'
or return to normal levels is that any intervention, such as police
crackdowns on gang members, which occurs immediately following these
spikes appears - erroneously - to have an effect," she wrote.

In other words, "it is likely that this decline in homicide rates would
have occurred naturally without any significant change in enforcement
practices."

Webster calls for more emphasis on preventive measures before youth get
involved in gangs and guns, such as more money for education, family
support, community programs and good housing.




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:25 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Globe & Mail: Nearly 850 convicts are unlawfully at large in Canada

by Nancy

Hey, All the better to just blame guns when crimes ae committed , right? Sarah B and company??????..........




Globe & Mail: Nearly 850 convicts are unlawfully at large in Canada
Date: Dec 28, 2006 9:32 AM
PUBLICATION: GLOBE AND MAIL
DATE: 2006.12.28
PAGE: A1 (ILLUS)
BYLINE: ALEX DOBROTA
SECTION: National News
EDITION: Metro
DATELINE: Ottawa ONT
WORD COUNT: 984

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Nearly 850 convicts on the lam nationwide
Police, victims groups concerned over data showing 145 inmates have
escaped prison

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

About 850 convicted criminals -- including a suspected biker-gang
affiliate who fired 15 shots at police officers and a man who killed a
gun salesman execution style -- are unlawfully at large in Canada.

The figures, obtained from Correctional Service Canada, show 145 inmates
escaped from federal penitentiaries between June of 1966 and October of
2006 and have not been caught.

The rest, 704 convicts, are unlawfully at large after having failed to
report to a parole officer during that same time frame.

The records take into account only convicts unlawfully at large from a
federal institution where they were serving a sentence of two years or
more.

Statistics compiled from the information provided by Corrections Canada
show one in four fugitives commits a crime within an average of 50 days
of their breakout. Robbery and break-ins are the most common felonies
with fugitives, but murder and sex offences are also on the list.

The findings, gathered from access to information requests made by The
Globe and Mail, have alarmed police officials and victims groups, who
have called for a review of parole sentences and minimum-security
prisons.

"Escape is rather a loose term," said Bruce Miller of the Police
Association of Ontario. "Escape is often nothing more than calling a
taxicab or calling a friend to drive you off." Minimum-security prisons
are meant to house inmates serving the latter part of their sentence or
who are perceived to pose no risk to society and who show no signs of
wanting to flee.

But in the past nine years, more than 500 inmates have walked away from
such facilities, many of which have no fences or walls.

All but 12 were caught.

Corrections Canada did not disclose the number of escapes from
minimum-security penitentiaries prior to 1997.

Among the convicts still on the lam are two of Quebec's most-wanted men:
Martin Pellerin and Steven Solyom. Both escaped from Montee St. Francois
Institution in Laval, the federal penitentiary that recorded the largest
number of escapes in the country.

Mr. Pellerin, a suspected affiliate of the Rock Machine biker gang, was
arrested in 1995 after a high-speed chase, during which the 38-year-old
man fired 15 shots at police officers.

Two years later, he tried to kill a fellow inmate at Donnacona
Institution, a maximum-security federal penitentiary.

Despite his violent history, correctional officers judged it was safe to
transfer Mr. Pellerin to a minimum-security prison in 2000.

In June of that year, he escaped.

Four years later, Mr. Solyom would escape from the same prison, where he
was serving a murder sentence. In 1989, Mr. Solyom shot dead a business
owner who cashed the cheques of welfare recipients; Mr. Solyom then made
off with $1,500.

Among those convicts on the lam who failed to report to a parole
officer, Jason Vincent Liss is likely the most notorious. In 1993, Mr.
Liss robbed a gun range in British Columbia. He took five semi-automatic
handguns. But before he left with his loot, he ordered a gun salesman
into a storage room.

Mr. Liss, then 21, made the salesman kneel and shot him twice in the
head. The RCMP has been looking for Mr. Liss since February of this
year.

For the victims, or their relatives, the knowledge that such
perpetrators are at large makes for a long and painful recovery, said
Steven Sullivan, the head of an Ottawa-based victims advocacy group.

"It really affects their quality of life," said Mr. Sullivan, president
of the Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime.

Victims registered with Correctional Services Canada are notified as
soon as an escape happens, he said, and some have to go into hiding.

"For victims, the knowledge that the person is out there, you could bump
into them any time on the street, could have a huge impact on their
ability to feel safe in their homes and their communities." In some
cases, fugitives also pose a danger.

In 1999, Darby Cairns walked away from Elbow Lake minimum-security
institution in British Columbia, where he was serving a sentence for
murder.

He was caught 20 days later and charged in the deaths of two people who
were killed while Mr. Cairns was at large.

Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Miller, of the Police Association of Ontario, have
called on the federal government to raise the bar for transfers to
minimum-security prisons and for parole sentences.

The Conservative government has promised to do away with statutory
release laws and is also planning a review of the federal corrections
system, said Melisa Leclerc, a spokeswoman for Public Safety Minister
Stockwell Day.

But one prisoners-rights advocate said convicts on the lam will always
exist in a system of justice that values rehabilitation.

Stiffening security conditions in penitentiaries or cracking down on
parole sentences would reduce inmates' ability to reintegrate into
society and would increase their likelihood of reoffending, said Graham
Stewart, executive director of the John Howard Society of Canada.

"Short of having a person in a box with a key, there's always some
opportunity to run away," Mr. Stewart said.

But a spokesman with Correctional Services Canada said the numbers of
convicts unlawfully at large must be put into context.

"One must not forget that we have 22,000 on our watch," Guy Campeau
said. "It's a small proportion [of people unlawfully at large]." Mr.
Campeau also said his department has boosted the number of guards in its
minimum-security prisons since 1999, when 107 convicts escaped. That
number has decreased drastically over the years, to 31 in 2004, and 28
in 2005.

And only 14 of the 145 federal penitentiary escapees unlawfully at large
in October went missing since 2000.

He said he expects many of this year's escapees to be caught within the
following months.

But he acknowledged that the number of convicts on the lam will likely
remain around 800, as more will escape custody or will fail to report to
their parole officers.

There is no national police unit in Canada specialized in hunting them
down, which is why many convicts can simply blend into communities
across the country and pass unnoticed for long periods of time, said
Halton police Detective Sergeant Greg Sullivan.

Until two years ago, Det. Sgt. Sullivan headed the only provincial
police unit in Canada that specializes in hunting convicts on the lam,
Ontario's Repeat Offender Parole Enforcement Unit. Since its inception
in 2002, ROPE has snatched an average of 300 convicts unlawfully at
large per year.

"The problem is . . . when a parole warrant is issued, it's sent to the
local police department," Det. Sgt. Sullivan said. "And there's really
no effort to try and find that person. Most police departments are
inundated with other problems."






The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:24 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Powerful DesNews Editorial in favor of Teachers trained w/ guns

by Nancy :)

Powerful DesNews Editorial in favor of Teachers trained w/ guns.


> Armed first responders are needed in schools
> By Fred Willoughby
> I am a retired military veteran (Marine Corps and Utah Army
> National
> Guard) with 45 years of law enforcement experience, including the Los
> Angeles Police Department during the 1960s and 1970s in Watts and shift
> commander on the sheriff's department in Boulder, Colo., and I personally
> encountered numerous incidents where deadly force had to be used. I even
> had
> to take a life in my front yard as I defended my family against five
> armed
> attackers while my family and two neighbors looked on.
> So I was saddened and frightened at the flawed opinion of the
> Deseret
> Morning News and the highly respected Utah Chiefs of Police Association
> that
> concluded guns should not be inside our schools. Based upon the UCPA's
> conclusions, I wonder how many of them have ever had to use deadly force?
> Those opinions tend to influence the public to the point that it could
> set a
> destructive and deadly precedent in our community that someday may prove
> tragic for children and adults in schools.
> Make no mistake, having no guns inside schools will almost always
> ensure that our children and adults - at some unknown location and date
> in
> America - will surely die or be injured. Killers almost always pick on
> the
> helpless and weak. They love to shoot unarmed people because it's easy
> and
> safer for them. Shooting unarmed people in school or any other place is
> like
> shooting fish in a barrel to such shooters.
> What the Deseret Morning News editorial did not point out - and
> most
> of the general public does not fully understand - is that highly trained,
> professional police officers and SWAT teams are second responders, not
> first
> responders. They do not have the element of surprise in a combat shooting
> situation. First responders are the people already at the scene, such as
> school officials. First responders do have the element of surprise. This
> is
> very important in shooting incidents. Rarely do second responders ever
> come
> upon the scene until the children are dead, wounded or taken hostage.
> This is why it is so important to have right-thinking, well- trained
> people inside the schools to surprise and incapacitate the shooters at
> the
> earliest possible moment before the problem escalates.
> Any right-thinking, mature person - if properly trained - can
> effectively use deadly force, even in a crowded school. A policeman's
> badge,
> the color of his uniform or his SWAT training is no assurance that things
> will go right. Highly trained police did not prevent the shootings at
> Columbine, nor have they at any other school. That is because, as second
> responders, they come in after the fact.
> I am very familiar with many police shootings that have gone bad
> because of poor judgment and lack of proper training. These shootings
> have
> prompted civil lawsuits and criminal charges against the officers, their
> agencies and the jurisdictions they work for. New Orleans, New York and
> even
> our Granite School District police are just a few examples.
> Our Founding Fathers' great wisdom is just as good now as it was
> when
> they wrote the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. Our Founders
> thought very highly of personal protection. That is why they put the
> Second
> Amendment second - only after freedom of religion and free speech.
> Please, Deseret Morning News, don't ignore their great wisdom in
> favor
> of political correctness. And Utah Chiefs of Police Association, please
> honor the oath of office you took to uphold and defend the Constitution.
>
> Fred Willoughby is an adjunct professor and has taught numerous criminal
> justice courses over the past eight years.


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 28, 2006, 7:13 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Drug trade fuels London crime

by Nancy

Drug trade fuels London crime
Date: Dec 27, 2006 12:07 PM
PUBLICATION: The London Free Press
DATE: 2006.12.26
EDITION: Final
SECTION: City & Region
PAGE: C2
BYLINE: PATRICK MALONEY, FREE PRESS REPORTER
WORD COUNT: 369

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Drug trade fuels London crime

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

One of the biggest challenges facing London police this coming year was
also a priority in 2006: Drugs.

The illegal drug trade plays a role in much of the city's petty crime as
well as more serious incidents, such as shootings. Combating it will
remain a key focus as the calendar turns to 2007, Chief Murray Faulkner
says.

"It's all connected to drugs," Faulkner said, referring to auto thefts,
break-and-enter thefts, robberies and shootings.

"It's drugs, it's guns and it's the whole spinoff of crime. That's
something that a large urban city has to deal with. We accept that it's
happening, but we don't have to accept that we tolerate it."

Several shootings in 2006 kept police busy, the first shots ringing out
among New Year's Eve revel-lers on Dundas Street. No one was arrested
and police had little co-operation from witnesses.

One shooting grabbed more attention than most: Four people were shot
downtown early on Oct. 7, leading to several charges against Ahmed
Moalin-Mohamed, 23. But Moalin-Mohamed disappeared after being released
on bail, sparking a strong reaction from Faulkner, who was critical of a
court system he said gives accused people breaks at the expense of
public safety.

He says he will continue to speak out about those concerns in 2007.
"That's going to be one of my themes. It has to (be) because no one else
is going to talk about it," he said.

He added there are "two types" of offenders he will focus on. "One
is
the repeat offender with dozens of convictions . . . who our courts keep
giving 16, 17, 18 chances. The second (is) the ones involved in weapons
and personal crimes."

Another major issue facing the police force is the expansion of its
Dundas Street headquarters.

The $34-million project, expected to start by spring, hit some recent
snags when neighbours in Old East Village raised concerns about the
building's exterior. More money, they argue, is needed to upgrade the
facade.

Faulkner, for his part, said a "happy balance" must be found among the
neighbours, architects and police.

After a staggering 14 homicides in 2005, the city's homicide rate
dropped significantly in 2006 to four. Attempted murders, however,
jumped 200 per cent to 12, police said.

Other crimes also jumped: Auto thefts climbed by 25 per cent and
robberies -- defined as theft involving violence -- were up 31 per cent.


Outside the city, the massacre of eight Bandidos bikers whose bodies
were found near Shedden on April 8 was likely the biggest crime story in
all of Canada in 2006.

It took only hours for OPP investigators to surround a farmhouse in Iona
Station and arrest five people. Ultimately, three more people from
Winnipeg were also charged.




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 27, 2006, 7:28 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


USA - So Much For Gun Control

by Nancy

USA - So Much For Gun Control
Date: Dec 27, 2006 6:59 PM
So Much For Gun Control
Dec 27 2006 2:01PM
http://sayanythingblog.com/index.php
The Brady Campaign To Prevent Gun Ownership has released rankings on gun
control in the various states, and the results are interesting when
correlated violent crime statistics.
http://www.kxmc.com/getARticle.asp?ArticleId=80112




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 27, 2006, 7:26 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Gov. Doyle, Mayor Barrett Should Reimburse Milwaukee Crime Victims

by Nancy

Gov. Doyle, Mayor Barrett Should Reimburse Milwaukee Crime Victims
Date: Dec 27, 2006 5:19 PM




NEWS RELEASE
GOV. DOYLE, MAYOR BARRETT SHOULD REIMBURSE MILWAUKEE CRIME VICTIMS
BELLEVUE, WA – Anti-gun Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle and Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett should financially reimburse armed robbery victims who have been left unable to defend themselves, thanks to the policies of these two politicians, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said today.

CCRKBA Executive Director Joe Waldron said two reports in recent days, one involving the robbery of a man by two armed men claiming to be undercover police officers, prove beyond doubt that Doyle’s veto of concealed carry legislation this year has given thugs a risk free working environment. Barrett opposed concealed carry.

“When armed outlaws are not afraid to impersonate police officers,” Waldron observed, “and can simply stop someone at gunpoint on a public street to take their money, you know the philosophy that created this mess is morally bankrupt to its core. And that moral bankruptcy rests in the offices of Mayor Barrett and Gov. Doyle.”

The other robbery, involving two apparent juveniles who drew handguns on the clerk at a Radio Shack last week, was just as brazen, Waldron said.

“Teenage thugs and bogus cops can carry guns,” Waldron said, “but not the law-abiding citizens of Wisconsin, and we can thank Jim Doyle and Tom Barrett for that. If rank-and-file Democrats truly support the right of self-defense and the right to bear arms as affirmed in the Wisconsin constitution, they should repudiate both of these men for opposing a sensible concealed carry law that would put honest people on an even footing with the criminals. As it stands now, lawbreakers have free rein to commit any outrage they please, and they know it.

“If and when the criminals who committed these crimes are apprehended,” Waldron said, “we should ask who they voted for in the last election.”

“The blame for this kind of crime lies in the governor’s office, and among the ranks of Democrats in the House and Senate who failed their responsibility to public safety by not overturning Doyle’s veto,” Waldron said. “And because we know who to blame, we know who should be held financially liable for every penny that is stolen from every shopkeeper and every citizen in Wisconsin. It’s time for Doyle and Barrett to dig into their pockets and put their money where their mouths were.”


-END-


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


< Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family >




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 27, 2006, 7:24 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


BRITAIN: Record turnout despite hunting ban:

by Nancy

BRITAIN: Record turnout despite hunting ban:
Date: Dec 27, 2006 11:57 AM
PUBLICATION: Edmonton Journal
DATE: 2006.12.27
EDITION: Final
SECTION: News
PAGE: B9
SOURCE: Agence France-Presse
DATELINE: LONDON
ILLUSTRATION: Photo: The Associated Press / Guy Mather of the
CheshireHunt takes part in the Boxing Day meet in Tarporley, Cheshire,
England, on Tuesday.
WORD COUNT: 405

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Record turnout despite hunting ban: Group wants new law overturned

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

LONDON - Countryside campaigners said more than 300,000 people took part
in traditional Boxing Day (Dec. 26) fox hunts across Britain Tuesday,
claiming it proved a ban on hunting with dogs was not working.

"We think we've had a record turnout this year,"said Charlotte Fiander
of the Countryside Alliance, which has been at the forefront of a drive
to overturn legislation in force since last February outlawing hunting
with dogs.

"We were expecting a big turnout as there is a lot of support for
hunting across the country. Everyone is still going out to show their
support -- this ban just isn't working ... It shows that this law needs
to be changed."

In all, 314 hunts took place on Tuesday, including some of the oldest
and most famous, such as the Beaufort in Gloucestershire, western
England, which counts Prince Charles and other members of the royal
family as supporters.

"The ban has not affected the popularity of the hunt at all," said Jo
Aldridge, from the Beaufort. "In fact, we seem to be being supported in
greater numbers than ever, so the ban hasn't worked from that viewpoint.


"Foxes are still being killed by the gun, probably in greater numbers
than when they would be killed via the hunt."

The large turnout of riders and supporters was a renewed show of
defiance to the Hunting Act 2004, which outlawed fox hunting, deer
hunting and hare coursing with dogs in England and Wales following
similar laws in Scotland.

Campaigners have tried to have the act declared invalid and claimed it
would devastate rural communities and local industries supporting hunts,
such as kennels for hounds and farriers who ensure hunt horses are
well-shod.

The legislation -- which followed years of campaigning by those who
viewed the bloodsport as cruel and inhumane -- means dogs cannot be used
to pursue and kill quarry. Under the terms of the Hunting Act, hounds
are still allowed to follow a scent and flush out foxes and other
quarry, which can then be killed by a bird of prey or shot if only two
dogs are involved.

Only one person has been convicted of breaking the controversial act. A
huntsman was fined 500 pounds ($1,100 Cdn) and ordered to pay costs in
August on a charge of hunting a fox in April last year.

The prosecution was brought by the League Against Cruel Sports, which is
monitoring hunts for any breaches of the law.

"The League does not have a problem with hunts meeting to either drag or
trail hunt on Boxing Day, as long as they do not violate the Hunting
Act," a spokeswoman said Tuesday.




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 27, 2006, 7:23 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Letter: Gun-toting 'lefty' mom helps to dispel myths

by Nancy

Letter: Gun-toting 'lefty' mom helps to dispel myths
Date: Dec 27, 2006 11:40 AM
PUBLICATION: Edmonton Journal
DATE: 2006.12.27
EDITION: Final
SECTION: Letters
PAGE: A19
BYLINE: Samara McPhedran
SOURCE: The Edmonton Journal
WORD COUNT: 101

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Gun-toting 'lefty' mom helps to dispel myths

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

For too long, the myth that only men own and use firearms has been
allowed to persist. As gun prohibitionists attempt to blur the lines
between legitimate firearm use, firearm crime, and violence in society,
women who participate in shooting and hunting have been marginalised by
efforts to construct firearms ownership as a threat to women.

The truth, however, is far removed from the fiction promoted by anti-gun
lobbyists. Sharon Gregson is one among millions of women worldwide who
shoot, and to pretend otherwise would be an injustice.

Samara McPhedran,
Chair, International Coalition for Women in Shooting and Hunting



The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 27, 2006, 7:20 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Letter: Self-protection

by Nancy

Letter: Self-protection
Date: Dec 27, 2006 11:41 AM
PUBLICATION: Edmonton Journal
DATE: 2006.12.27
EDITION: Final
SECTION: Letters
PAGE: A19
BYLINE: Daniel Johnston
SOURCE: The Edmonton Journal
WORD COUNT: 86

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Self-protection

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Re: "Lefty mom comes out as gun enthusiast: Afraid of firearms until
three years ago," The Journal, Dec. 19.

I applaud Sharon Gregson for her stand. Regrettably, there will be many
who won't.

We've heard the non-logic about comparing ourselves to the U.S., the
bizarre assertion that Gregson is promoting violence, and the usual
emotionally charged rhetoric from the anti-gun lobby. While these people
readily admit there are people who would do women harm, they are quick
to reject empowering a woman to protect herself.

Daniel Johnston, Edmonton




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 27, 2006, 7:21 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Letter: Taking responsibility

by Nancy

Letter: Taking responsibility
Date: Dec 27, 2006 11:42 AM
PUBLICATION: The Province
DATE: 2006.12.27
EDITION: Final
SECTION: Editorial
PAGE: A21
BYLINE: Frederick Hoenisch
SOURCE: The Province
WORD COUNT: 160

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Taking responsibility

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Bravo to Sharon Gregson who wants to legally carry firearms to protect
herself and her family.

Shame on those who don't understand her perceived need for this, and on
those who suggest she resign her Vancouver school trustee position.

At a recent information session at our daughter's preschool on the
transition into kindergarten, I was surprised to hear a number of public
schools espousing a zero-tolerance approach to bullying and
name-calling.

By contrast, the private-school representatives seemed to promote
teaching their students how to best deal with the situation rather than
isolate them in a protected environment.

I don't promote arming elementary students as a way to deal with
bullies, but I admire the school trustee for taking responsibility for
defending her family.

While it would be very easy to ignore or deny that bullies are out
there, one only has to look at some of the world's leaders to realize
that we'd better learn to take care of ourselves before others decide
how they will take care of us.

Frederick Hoenisch, Saanich




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 27, 2006, 7:22 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Wife-threatener remains in custody

by Nancy

"might be a danger to his wife if released" ---DUUUUUHHH, ya think?!?!?!?
---------------------------------


Wife-threatener remains in custody
Date: Dec 23, 2006 9:01 AM
PUBLICATION: The Daily News (Halifax)
DATE: 2006.12.23
SECTION: Local News
PAGE: 8
BYLINE: Boomer, Rachel
ILLUSTRATION: PETER SWEET
WORD COUNT: 274

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Wife-threatener remains in custody

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

A man who threatened to kill his wife, then locked himself in the garage
with a high-powered rifle and shot it into the ceiling, must stay in
jail until his appeal is heard.

In a decision yesterday, the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal ruled that
Peter Allen Sweet, 32, of South Alton, Kings Co., might be a danger to
his wife if released until his appeal is heard Feb. 9, 2007.

"In this situation of family violence, I am worried about the physical
safety of Peter Allen Sweet's wife," wrote Justice Elizabeth Roscoe."

She noted Sweet was drinking during the Oct. 19, 2005 incident, and has
reported an addiction to cocaine. A psychiatrist's report says he's
threatened his wife before.

"The evidence does not satisfy me that public safety concerns would be
adequately addressed if he were released ... His release would tend to
undermine public confidence in the administration of justice."

Sweet pleaded guilty to assault, uttering a death threat and careless
use of a firearm Oct. 31, 2006.

Sentencing Judge Claudine MacDonald said on the day of the attack,
Sweet, who was "significantly intoxicated," put his arms around his
wife's throat and threatened to kill her and her family if she left him.
He waved around some bannister railings, then grabbed a high- powered
rifle, locked himself into the garage, and shot the rifle into the
ceiling.

On Nov. 15, MacDonald sentenced Sweet to 10 months in jail, on top of
one month he'd already spent in jail waiting for trial. The sentence
also calls for two years' probation and a nearly 11-year ban on
firearms.

Sweet had argued he could get Narcotics Anonymous support and addiction
treatment programs if he wasn't sent to jail pending appeal.






The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 23, 2006, 9:50 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Letter: On target

by WAGC

Letter: On target
Date: Dec 23, 2006 9:08 AM
PUBLICATION: Calgary Herald
DATE: 2006.12.23
EDITION: Final
SECTION: Q: Queries - Quibbles - Quirks
PAGE: A23
BYLINE: Chris Bermingham
SOURCE: Calgary Herald
WORD COUNT: 139

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

On target

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Guns - Re: "Shooting from the hip," Other Voices, Dec. 21.

I would like to thank Sharon Gregson, the B.C. school trustee, for
bringing into the public eye what few people had known before -- that
left-thinking people can be in favour of armed self-defence.

In the mid-'90s, when the Liberals were drafting the Firearms Act which
brought in the long gun registry, they included provisions for granting
authorizations to carry handguns for those who need them for protection
from dangerous people and animals.

Permits for such purposes have been issued for more than 100 years,
since the carrying of weapons was first regulated. If an MP decided to
table legislation to change the policy of issuing authorizations to
mainly judges and Crown prosecutors, I hope the Liberal party would
support the effort to improve the fairness of the legislation they
enacted.

Chris Bermingham, Calgary



The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 23, 2006, 9:48 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


BRITAIN: Gunmen were on police bail when they killed WPc

by Nancy


In Britain, they don't get it............ Criminals who miss use firearms should NOT be out on bail, but in Britain as in Canada and elsewhere, they would rather have gun control than criminal control..... yep , let's blame the innaimate objects and ban them all !!!! that works ----------- NOT!

-------------------------
BRITAIN: Gunmen were on police bail when they killed WPc
Date: Dec 23, 2006 9:02 AM
PUBLICATION: The Daily Telegraph
DATE: 2006.12.23
PAGE: 010
SECTION: News
BYLINE: Paul Stokes
WORD COUNT: 774

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Gunmen were on police bail when they killed WPc

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

TWO of the killers of Pc Sharon Beshenivsky were on police bail for
suspected firearms offences when she was shot dead during an armed raid
on a travel agency, it was disclosed yesterday.

Muzzaker Shah and Faisal Razzaq, both 25, were arrested, questioned and
released pending further inquiries in connection with an unrelated
incident the previous year.

They had convictions for robbery and Shah for carrying a firearm but,
under time limits for holding suspects, had to be released unless
sufficient evidence was available to charge them.

Details of the alleged offences cannot be reported for legal reasons.

The next police heard of them was when they emerged as suspects in the
shooting of Pc Beshenivsky at a travel agency in Bradford on Nov 18 last
year.

Shah, a British-born Asian, and Yusuf Jama, 20, a Somali refugee, were
warned yesterday they could spend the rest of their lives in prison
after being convicted of her murder.

They must serve at least 35 years before they are considered for parole
after the point-blank shooting of the unarmed officer.

Passing life sentences, Mr Justice Andrew Smith told them at Newcastle
Crown Court: "You may never be released.''

Shah gave a defiant gangster-style hand gesture as he was led from the
dock.

Razzaq, who acted as a "look-out and pathfinder'' during the raid on
a
travel agency, was given a life sentence with a minimum term of 11 years
after being convicted of manslaughter, robbery and firearms offences.

Pc Beshenivsky, 38, was half an hour from the end of her shift with Pc
Teresa Milburn when they responded to a panic alarm call. They would
have been within their rights to leave the call to other colleagues.

Pc Beshenivsky had switched her shift so she could be at home to hold a
party for her daughter Lydia's fourth birthday that evening on Nov 18
last year.

As the two officers approached the door of the Universal Express
premises, they were confronted by two men bursting out - one armed with
a 9mm pistol and the other with a Mac 10 sub-machinegun.

Pc Beshenivsky died instantly from a bullet through the heart while her
colleague was seriously wounded after being shot through the chest.

Although Jama claimed in evidence that his finger was on the trigger, Pc
Milburn remains convinced that Shah fired the shots.

She has since returned to working, on reduced six-hour shifts, and
joined Pc Beshenivsky's husband Paul, 44, a landscape gardener, in court
to hear the sentencing.

Sitting behind them, with a row of police officers in between, were
members of the killers' families.

Jama's brother Mustaf, 26, is still being sought by police on suspicion
of the murder and is believed to have fled Britain for his native
Somalia a year ago. One theory is that he stole his sister's passport
and wore a Muslim veil as a disguise to get through checks at Heathrow.

Detectives are also hunting Piran Ditta Khan, 58, a Pakistani who ran
takeaway food businesses in London and Aberdeen, who is thought to have
masterminded the bungled robbery in which pounds 5,400 was stolen. Pc
Milburn, 38, who is married with a teenage son, sobbed as the court
heard how she was continuing her duties with "courage and resolution''.

Speaking after the case, Pc Milburn said she would always have to live
with what had happened.

She said: "I can remember every second like yesterday and it is
something that will never leave me. It is something I have to learn to
live with.''

Pc Milburn joined the West Yorkshire Police in April 2004 after spending
several years working as a seamstress.

She described Pc Beshenivsky as "caring and compassionate'' and said
she
was someone who made people laugh.

Smiling, Pc Milburn said: "Sharon was lovely. She was a genuine caring
compassionate person. She brought these qualities with her every single
day. She was a professional, enthusiastic police officer and she made us
laugh.

"Sharon was Sharon. I've got a lot of good memories of her.''

Pc Milburn said going back to work after the shootings was very hard.
"It has been very difficult but things take time and I am working on it
and I will continue to work on it,'' she said.

She is now working six-hour shifts and easing herself back into her job.


"Physically I'm not too bad and I am getting there,'' she said.
"I was
shot in the chest. Emotionally it is different.''

However, Pc Milburn said she was convinced that Shah shot her - despite
Jamma claiming in court that he was the gunman. "I know who shot us.
There was only me stood in that doorway with two other people and they
know. As I gave in evidence, I said who it was.''

Asked whether she was angry that no-one had been convicted of shooting
her, all Pc Milburn would say was that the robbery was a "joint
enterprise''.

"This was done as a joint enterprise and I was very lucky that day.''
Det Supt Andy Brennan, who led the investigation, said after the hearing
that his force, Mr Beshenivsky and Pc Milburn were all pleased with the
sentences.

He said: "My hope is that they will act as a deterrent for anybody who
contemplates carrying weapons for robberies. Shah and Jama are
incredibly dangerous and ruthless and I believe they would continue to
commit crimes if they were free.''

Shah, from London, admitted murder, robbery and firearms offences, but
was acquitted of the attempted murder of Pc Milburn on the directions of
the judge.

Jama, of Small Heath, Birmingham, was convicted of murder and possessing
firearms with intent and admitted robbery and two other firearms
offences.




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 23, 2006, 9:41 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


question for gunners

by stevo

hi
i am a student of law and i am writing an article about WAGC i couldnt find the number of members your group counts and i would appriciate it alot if i can get help in this.
thanks alot
p.s:there is nothing comparing to glock 19c

Posted on Dec 23, 2006, 6:14 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


WAGC

by WAGC

WAGC is Natioanl (Chapters in 48 states) as well as International (Chapters in Italy, Canada, Brazil, Britain and South Africa)


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 23, 2006, 9:45 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


This is the TRUE agenda of gun conntrol !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by

Police seize thousands of guns owned by civilians
Date: Dec 22, 2006 9:27 AM
Police seize thousands of guns owned by civilians
Alvin Darlanika Soedarjo, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
http://www.thejakartapost.com/yesterdaydetail.asp?fileid=20061221.H03




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 22, 2006, 10:37 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Gun control, here we go again

by Nancy

Philippines - Gun control, here we go again
Date: Dec 22, 2006 9:44 AM
Gun control, here we go again
By Dan Mariano - Manila Times - Philippines
http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2006/dec/22/yehey/opinion/20061222op
i2.html




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 22, 2006, 10:34 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Australia: Anti-gun lobby concerned laws will be watered down

by Nancy

Australia: Anti-gun lobby concerned laws will be watered down
Date: Dec 22, 2006 9:40 AM
Anti-gun lobby concerned laws will be watered down
The Coalition for Gun Control believes the Tasmanian Government is to
turn its back on the 1996 national firearms agreement. The agreement was
drawn up after the Port Arthur massacre. A review by the University of
Tasmania has found all states do not fully comply with the resolutions
in the agreement.
www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200612/s1816921.htm


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !



    
This message has been edited by WAGCEVP on Dec 22, 2006 10:35 PM
This message has been edited by WAGCEVP on Dec 22, 2006 10:34 PM

Posted on Dec 22, 2006, 10:34 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


New Zealand: Greens call for tough gun control laws

by Nancy

New Zealand: Greens call for tough gun control laws
Date: Dec 22, 2006 9:36 AM
Greens call for tough gun control laws
NZPA | Thursday, 21 December 2006
Military-style weapons should be disabled and all guns should be
registered, the Green Party said today after the police announced more
than 500 firearms had been seized in nationwide raids.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/3907356a10.html



The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 22, 2006, 10:35 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Montreal teen avoids Prison Despite Posting Threats Online

by Nancy

Montreal teen avoids Prison Despite Posting Threats Online
Date: Dec 22, 2006 10:11 AM
PUBLICATION: National Post
PAGE: A9
DATE: 2006.12.22
SECTION: Canada
EDITION: National
NOTE:
BYLINE:
SOURCE: CanWest News Service
COLUMN:
DATELINE:
ILLUSTRATION: Black & White Photo : / (See hardcopy for Photo
Description);
WORD COUNT: 145

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Montreal teen avoids Prison Despite Posting Threats Online

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

A 15-year-old Montreal boy has been sentenced to six months open custody
and 12 months probation for threatening students and personnel at a high
school in Hudson, Que. The teen, who cannot be named, has admitted
posting to the website www.vampirefreaks.com days after the deadly
rampage at Montreal's Dawson College in September. He pleaded guilty in
September for writing the threatening words, but said he but did not
mean them. In the message, the boy described Kimveer Gill (pictured),
who killed student Anastasia de Sousa and injured 20 others, as "a
saint." And he warned, "This will happen at Hudson High School Senior,
and when it does, I can't wait to die, or help in the process."




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 22, 2006, 10:32 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Many say Dawson proof gun law fails

by Nancy

Many say Dawson proof gun law fails
Date: Dec 22, 2006 10:12 AM
PUBLICATION: The Calgary Sun
DATE: 2006.12.22
EDITION: Final
SECTION: News
PAGE: 48
ILLUSTRATION: photo by CP Students flee Dawson College after reports of
a gunman in the building in Montreal on Sept. 13. The shooting rampage
sparked a new round in the debate over gun control in Canada.
BYLINE: CP
DATELINE: MONTREAL
WORD COUNT: 154

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Many say Dawson proof gun law fails

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

When killer Kimveer Gill walked into Dawson College armed with three
weapons, he unleashed a shooting rampage that left one student dead and
hundreds of others facing a lifetime of fear.

Gill triggered a new round in the near-constant battle over gun control
in Canada.

Even the gunman's mother would like to see changes.

"I'm in favour of gun control, there's no doubt," Parwinder Kaur
Gill,
whose family has also been irrevocably damaged, said in an interview.

She would like semi-automatic weapons, such as the ones her son owned,
to come under more rigorous control and she'd like some measures to deal
with mental illness.

Gill was armed with a Beretta semi-automatic rifle, a Glock .45-calibre
pistol and a 12-gauge shotgun when he burst into the college atrium
Sept. 13.

Gill opened fire, injuring 20 students and murdering 18-year-old
Anastasia De Sousa, who was shot nine times at close range.

All of the guns were registered and Gill had met all the criteria for
legal ownership of firearms in Canada.

And that, say gun-control opponents, is the problem with the system put
in place largely due to another horrific event in Montreal -- the 1989
Ecole polytechnique massacre.

Opponents say the current gun-control system is useless and does nothing
to stop such tragedies




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 22, 2006, 10:31 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Letter: The root of the problem is not handguns

by Nancy

Letter: The root of the problem is not handguns
Date: Dec 21, 2006 10:28 AM
PUBLICATION: Vancouver Sun
DATE: 2006.12.21
EDITION: Final
SECTION: Editorial
PAGE: A16
BYLINE: Larri H. Woodrow
SOURCE: Vancouver Sun
WORD COUNT: 139

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Need for guns speaks volumes about societal problems

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Re: Solicitor-general criticizes school trustee, Dec. 20

When I ride our wilderness horse trails in grizzly country, I pack my
Winchester. In 30 years of remote back-country pack trips, I've never
met an unarmed fellow traveller. In its place, the rifle is an essential
tool.

If women in America feel the need to pack a pistol, this speaks volumes
about their societal problems. If a well-known, home-grown advocate for
children expresses her desire to pack heat on Vancouver streets, I say
we have a growing problem. And the root of the problem is not handguns.

Sharon Gregson is on target by advocating for more social programs for
single mothers. Solicitor-General John Les and our B.C. Liberals should
focus on removing the "grizzlies" from our streets. Increased funding
for an arsenal of social programs targeted for our children would help.

Larri H. Woodrow
Langley




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 21, 2006, 7:28 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Mountie guilty of firearms charge

by Nancy

Mountie guilty of firearms charge
Date: Dec 21, 2006 10:07 AM
PUBLICATION: The Daily News (Halifax)
DATE: 2006.12.21
SECTION: Local News
PAGE: 7
BYLINE:
SOURCE: CP
WORD COUNT: 83

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Mountie guilty of firearms charge

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

A Mountie has pleaded guilty to a charge of careless use of a firearm
and will be sentenced in the new year.

Const. Adree Mohammed Zahara, 40, fired her service pistol during a
domestic dispute at her home in Chester Basin on Oct. 15.

Zahara also asked the Bridgewater court for permission to contact her
former partner, Const. Chuck Simm, to arrange access to their child.
Zahara, who is off duty until the case is concluded, will be sentenced
Feb. 7.




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 21, 2006, 7:27 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


New Direction?

by Nancy

New Direction?
Date: Dec 19, 2006 8:20 PM
The Democrats new promise:




"A New Direction For America"







The stock market is at a new all-time high.

A new direction from there means, what?




Unemployment is at a 25 year low.

A new direction from there means, what?




Oil prices are plummeting.

A new direction from there means, what?




Taxes are at 20 year lows.

A new direction from there means, what?




Federal tax revenues are at all-time highs.

A new direction from there means, what?




The Federal deficit is down almost 50%, just as predicted over last

year.

A new direction from there means, what?




Home valuations are up 200% over the past 3.5 years.

A new direction from there means, what?




Inflation is in check, hovering at 20 year lows.

A new direction from there means, what?




Not a single terrorist attack on US soil since 9/11/01

A new direction from there means, what?




Osama bin Laden is living under a rock in a dark cave, having not

surfaced in years, if he's alive at all, while 95% of Al Queda's top

dogs are either dead or in custody, cooperating with US Intel.

A new direction from there means, what?




Several major terrorist attacks already thwarted by US and British

Intel, including the recent planned attack involving 10 Jumbo Jets

being exploded in mid-air over major US cities in order to celebrate

the anniversary of the 9/11/01 attacks.

A new direction from there means, what?







Just as President Bush foretold us of on a number of occasions, Iraq

was to be made "ground zero" for the war on terrorism -- and just as

President Bush said they would, terrorist cells from all over the

region are arriving from the shadows of their hiding places and

flooding into Iraq in order to get their faces blown off by US

Marines rather than boarding planes and heading to the United States

to wage war on us here.

A new direction from there means, what?







Moreover, bear in mind that all of the above occurred in the face of

the 1999 tech crash, the epidemic of corporate scandals throughout

the 90's, and the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks on NYC years in the

planning, which collectively sucked 24 trillion dollars and 7.8

million jobs out of the US economy even before G. W. Bush had time to

unpack his suitcases in the White House. It's easy to try and

discredit, disgrace and defame our George W. Bush; what's not so easy

to do is to refute irrefutable facts, no matter how one might try.




So what are the liberals going to do for me????




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 21, 2006, 7:24 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


VICTORY FOR OHIO GUN OWNERS . . .

by Nancy :)

VICTORY FOR OHIO GUN OWNERS . . . The Ohio Senate last week followed in the footsteps of the state House by voting to override Gov. Bob Taft's veto of legislation that will create statewide preemption regarding firearms laws and regulations. This action will ensure that municipalities cannot pass gun-control measures more stringent than that of the state. The bill will bring uniformity to Ohio's gun laws by preempting an estimated 80 local laws, including those restricting right-to-carry.

The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 21, 2006, 7:20 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


JUDGE: HANDGUN ORDINANCE VIOLATES LAW . . . (NJ)

by Nancy :)

JUDGE: HANDGUN ORDINANCE VIOLATES LAW . . . A state court judge last week ruled a Jersey City ordinance limiting handgun purchases to one gun a month violated the state's preemption laws, recognizing that the state of New Jersey has already enacted comprehensive regulations regarding the acquisition and sale of firearms and that municipalities do not have the right to enact additional gun-control measures. "Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens and bullying lawful firearms dealers is not the way to curb violent crime," said New Jersey Association of Firearms Retailers (NJAFR) president Bob Viden. "Judge Gallipoli made the right decision. State law must preempt any attempts by localities to unfairly restrict or hinder our constitutional right to keep and bear arms." The lead plaintiff in the case was NSSF and NJAFR member Frank Caso (Caso's Gun-a-Rama). Published reports indicate Ceasefire NJ and the city of Jersey City intend to appeal this decision.



The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 21, 2006, 7:21 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Turns out gun law isn't bulletproof

by Nancy

Turns out gun law isn't bulletproof
Date: Dec 20, 2006 9:02 PM
Too bad the reporter did not ask the mayor to cite the "studies" that show similar laws
have reduced "gun trafficking" elsewhere.

http://www.nj.com/news/jjournal/index.ssf?/base/news-3/116651180057670.xml&coll=3


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 21, 2006, 7:27 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Firearms advocate sticks to her guns:

by Nancy :)

Firearms advocate sticks to her guns:
Date: Dec 19, 2006 7:42 AM
PUBLICATION: Vancouver Sun
DATE: 2006.12.19
EDITION: Final
SECTION: News
PAGE: A1 / Front
BYLINE: Janet Steffenhagen
SOURCE: Vancouver Sun
ILLUSTRATION: Colour Photo: Sharon Gregson's photo on the cover of the
Canadian Firearms Journal. The Vancouver school trustee has written an
article entitled 'A Woman with a .45.'; Photo: Canadian Firearms Journal
/ Sharon Gregson also claims to be the most-tattooed elected official in
Canada.
WORD COUNT: 605

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Firearms advocate sticks to her guns: 'Firearms are a healthy part of
society,' says pistol-packin' Vancouver school trustee

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

The attractive woman posing with a .45-calibre Colt on the front of the
Canadian Firearms Journal this month is not your typical gun defender.
Nor is she your average public school board trustee.

But Sharon Gregson is all that and more. She's a long-time New Democrat,
a mother of four and an advocate of publicly funded daycare who recently
found her voice as a firearms champion. She admits it is an odd
combination, especially since she was afraid of guns until three years
ago when she received one as a gift.

"Before that I had been quite anti-gun," she said in an interview. "It
is kind of weird for somebody on the left to be enthusiastic about a gun
sport but, nevertheless, that's what I do and that's who I am.

"I am very committed to my social justice principles. I wish that as
Canadians we had spent the money that we spent on the gun registry on a
national child-care program, because that would have created a far
healthier society than we are now."

Her Vancouver outing as a gun enthusiast occurred Monday when she was
interviewed on a radio program talking about her competitive shooting,
her three firearms and her recent application for a U.S. permit to carry
a concealed weapon when visiting the U.S.

The response was overwhelming. "It was huge. Much, much, much, much
bigger than I would ever -- in a million years -- have guessed," she
said later. "People are incredibly curious about why I'm interested in
guns and the fact that I'm an elected person and a mother and a
child-care advocate."

She also claims to be the most tattooed elected official in Canada,
although there's been no national show-and-tell as yet.

The Vancouver school trustee said she is speaking publicly about gun
ownership to encourage a reasonable discussion in Canada with decisions
based on research rather than emotion.

"By speaking out as a legal gun owner who is concerned all the time
about safe storage, safe transport and safe handling of firearms, and
who enjoys firearms as a sport and as a collector, I think I'm putting
forward another part of the discussion and another perspective."

Her interest in guns blossomed in 2003 after her partner, Thomas
Lockhart, a competitive shooter, gave her the Colt .45.

She bought a membership at a shooting range, began to practise and was
soon competing with IPSC, the International Practical Shooting
Confederation.

"There's a huge amount of skill involved in shooting successfully and I
don't think that's recognized often enough," she said. "Some people
like
golfing, some people like hockey, I like shooting."

Gregson has also offered her support to a National Firearms Association
campaign promoting the rights of women to carry concealed firearms for
protection. She has applied for a permit in Utah to carry a concealed
weapon in the U.S. and expects to receive it soon.

Utah is one of only a few states that grants such licences to Canadians,
and Gregson said it was "prudent" to take advantage of that opportunity,
especially given that gun laws change frequently.

Asked if she wants to carry a concealed weapon in Canada, she replied
that while the situation is different here than in the U.S., there have
been times when she would have been safer if she had been carrying a
gun.

The response to her radio interview Monday was mixed, she said. Some
people were pleased she had broadened a debate while others said Canada
should ban firearms altogether. As of mid-afternoon, there had been no
word from the Coalition of Progressive Electors (COPE), under whose
banner she was elected to school board.

"I think most of my colleagues will be surprised that I'm a gun
enthusiast," said the former president of the NDP riding association in
Vancouver-Hastings.

"I think my fellow trustees might be looking at me a little differently
at the meeting tonight -- wondering what other hidden interests I have."


jsteffenhagen@png.canwest.com

- - -

This story can be heard online after 10:30 a.m. today at
www.vancouversun.com/readaloud.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------

PUBLICATION: GLOBE AND MAIL
DATE: 2006.12.19
PAGE: A11 (ILLUS)
BYLINE: JANE ARMSTRONG
SECTION: National News
EDITION: Metro
DATELINE: Vancouver BC
WORDS: 857

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

B.C. trustee won't conceal her love of guns Vancouver mother wants
relaxation of handgun laws, but colleagues want her to stop shooting off
her mouth

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Vancouver school board trustee Sharon Gregson loves to shoot her Colt
.45 handgun. She's posed with her prized weapon on the cover of a
national magazine and even went to the United States to obtain a
concealed handgun permit, which is good in 30 states.

She thinks Canadians need to broaden their thinking about handgun
ownership.

"There is a thinking that guns can only be bad and related to crime, and
that's not my experience as a legal gun owner, participating in a gun
sport," Ms. Gregson said, explaining why she decided to get a handgun
permit in Utah.

Recently, Ms. Gregson sent an e-mail to Prime Minister Stephen Harper
urging him to relax handgun restrictions.

"One of the frustrations with being a gun owner [in Canada] is that the
rules keep changing and so it seemed prudent to apply for this licence
while it was available to me." But some of Ms. Gregson's colleagues have
urged the trustee, a married mother of four, to stop shooting her mouth
off.

Trustee Clarence Hanson said her comments send the wrong message to
kids.

"I was quite shocked," Mr. Hanson said after he heard Ms. Gregson on a
morning radio program yesterday, in which she argued in favour of easier
access for permits to carry a concealed gun, especially for women who
feel threatened.

"As a school trustee, my concern is basically, we have a number of
children . . . who sometimes feel harassed and bullied.

"I don't want them to get the impression that this is the way to protect
yourself," Mr. Hanson said.

"If they get a feeling that a school trustee who represents them thinks
it's okay to protect yourself in this way, . . . we're going down a
dangerous road, I think." But Ms. Gregson said she won't retract her
comments and invited Canadians to start a national discussion about gun
ownership, safety and crime rates.

Ms. Gregson said she appeared on the cover of the National Firearms
Journal to lend her support to its campaign to loosen Canadian
restrictions on carrying handguns.

Currently in Canada, only target shooters and collectors can get a
permit to buy a handgun.

And rules for transporting the weapon are restricted to taking it back
and forth to a gun club or gunsmith.

"I think that there should at least be more discussion about the issue
surrounding guns in Canada," she said.

"Right now in Canada, you can't own a handgun for the sole issue of
self-defence. You can have it for target shooting and for collection.

"I don't think it's appropriate to say we shouldn't even discuss
protection issues and safety issues." Ms. Gregson became interested in
guns after she received the handgun as a gift.

At a shooting range in the suburban Vancouver municipality of Maple
Ridge, she began competing in International Practical Shooting
Confederation tournaments in which shooters complete an obstacle course
while firing at targets.

"You know, some people like bowling, some people like knitting.

I like shooting," Ms. Gregson said.

"The people who are very good are absolutely amazing to watch.

It's completely entertaining and their skill level is just so
impressive." Ms. Gregson said she did not mean to suggest that kids in
the school system be urged to carry guns.

However, she did suggest that the outcome of the Montreal massacre might
have been different if any one of Marc Lepine's 14 female victims had
been carrying a weapon.

"I've heard some people say if one of those women had been armed, [Mr.
Lepine] might not have been able to commit such a horrendous crime if
they weren't all completely defenceless against that onslaught," Ms.
Gregson said.

"But in no way have I ever suggested this has anything to do with kids
carrying guns to protect themselves." However, Mr. Hanson said he wants
to talk to Ms. Gregson about her comments.

"I think when we become a school trustee, you've raised the bar a little
bit for yourself. So you have to help set an example out there." The
head of the Canada's main gun-control lobby denounced Ms.

Gregson's comments as well as the National Firearms Association campaign
that is trying to make it easier for women to carry handguns.

"If arming to self-protect worked, the U.S. would be safe and it's not,"
Wendy Cukier said in a telephone interview.

"It's an absurd comment. It's completely contrary to Canadian
traditions. It has no basis in fact, and for someone who is associated
with schools to be making those comments is particularly alarming,
especially a woman." The Edmonton-based National Firearms Association,
which is spearheading the permit campaign, has argued that women can
better protect themselves from personal attack and reduce crime if they
are permitted to carry handguns.

"It's about safety," said the association's president, Dave Tomlinson.

"Most women feel relatively helpless. They regard themselves as not
having any practical way to defend themselves.

"Police protection is a myth. Police only come after the crime has been
committed."




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 21, 2006, 7:14 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


CBC NEWS: Gun group wants women to fight for permits

by Nancy :)

CBC NEWS: Gun group wants women to fight for permits
Date: Dec 18, 2006 1:42 PM
CBC NEWS: Gun group wants women to fight for permits
Vancouver school trustee featured in campaign for right to carry
concealed guns
Last Updated: Monday, December 18, 2006 | 8:43 AM PT
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-columbia/story/2006/12/18/gun-women.htm
l

August 23, 2006 - PUBLIC SAFETY MINISTER STOCKWELL DAY CLARIFIES
"AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY" STATISTICS
http://www.garrybreitkreuz.com/publications/2006/822.pdf

May 12, 2006 - Q-6: UPDATED AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY STATISTICS
http://www.garrybreitkreuz.com/inthehouse/Questions/2006/may_12.htm




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 21, 2006, 7:19 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Zero Tolerance apparently clearly means Zero Common Sense too.

by Nancy

Zero Tolerance apparently clearly means Zero Common Sense too.
http://cbs2chicago.com/local/local_story_348001946.html


Dec 13, 2006 11:17 pm US/Central

Teen Expelled From School For Turning In Found Gun

Plainfield Student's Parents Say The Punishment Doesn't Make Sense




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 17, 2006, 5:02 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Powerful DesNews Editorial in favor of Teachers trained w/ guns.

by Nancy

Powerful DesNews Editorial in favor of Teachers trained w/ guns.
Date: Dec 17, 2006 3:48 PM
Sunday, December 17, 2006

Format for printingE-mail story




Armed first responders are needed in schools
By Fred Willoughby
I am a retired military veteran (Marine Corps and Utah Army National
Guard) with 45 years of law enforcement experience, including the Los
Angeles Police Department during the 1960s and 1970s in Watts and shift
commander on the sheriff's department in Boulder, Colo., and I personally
encountered numerous incidents where deadly force had to be used. I even had
to take a life in my front yard as I defended my family against five armed
attackers while my family and two neighbors looked on.
So I was saddened and frightened at the flawed opinion of the Deseret
Morning News and the highly respected Utah Chiefs of Police Association that
concluded guns should not be inside our schools. Based upon the UCPA's
conclusions, I wonder how many of them have ever had to use deadly force?
Those opinions tend to influence the public to the point that it could set a
destructive and deadly precedent in our community that someday may prove
tragic for children and adults in schools.
Make no mistake, having no guns inside schools will almost always
ensure that our children and adults - at some unknown location and date in
America - will surely die or be injured. Killers almost always pick on the
helpless and weak. They love to shoot unarmed people because it's easy and
safer for them. Shooting unarmed people in school or any other place is like
shooting fish in a barrel to such shooters.
What the Deseret Morning News editorial did not point out - and most
of the general public does not fully understand - is that highly trained,
professional police officers and SWAT teams are second responders, not first
responders. They do not have the element of surprise in a combat shooting
situation. First responders are the people already at the scene, such as
school officials. First responders do have the element of surprise. This is
very important in shooting incidents. Rarely do second responders ever come
upon the scene until the children are dead, wounded or taken hostage.
This is why it is so important to have right-thinking, well-trained
people inside the schools to surprise and incapacitate the shooters at the
earliest possible moment before the problem escalates.
Any right-thinking, mature person - if properly trained - can
effectively use deadly force, even in a crowded school. A policeman's badge,
the color of his uniform or his SWAT training is no assurance that things
will go right. Highly trained police did not prevent the shootings at
Columbine, nor have they at any other school. That is because, as second
responders, they come in after the fact.
I am very familiar with many police shootings that have gone bad
because of poor judgment and lack of proper training. These shootings have
prompted civil lawsuits and criminal charges against the officers, their
agencies and the jurisdictions they work for. New Orleans, New York and even
our Granite School District police are just a few examples.
Our Founding Fathers' great wisdom is just as good now as it was when
they wrote the Constitution and Declaration of Independence. Our Founders
thought very highly of personal protection. That is why they put the Second
Amendment second - only after freedom of religion and free speech.
Please, Deseret Morning News, don't ignore their great wisdom in favor
of political correctness. And Utah Chiefs of Police Association, please
honor the oath of office you took to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Fred Willoughby is an adjunct professor and has taught numerous criminal
justice courses over the past eight years.


James D. "Mitch" Vilos
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 1148
Centerville, Utah 84014
Local Tel.No.: (801)295-3340
Mobile: (801)560-7117
1(800)530-0222
Practice Concentrating in Accidents and Personal Injury, Insurance Law,
Medical Malpractice, Defective Products, Workplace Injuries (not Worker's
Compensation), and Firearms Law (representation of gun owners in criminal
actions, and expungements).




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 17, 2006, 5:01 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


THE LARK PROGRAM

by Anonymous

THE LARK PROGRAM

A Lady liberal wrote a lot of letters to the White House complaining

about the treatment of a captive insurgent (terrorist) being held in

Guantanamo Bay.



She received back the following reply:



The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington, D.C. 20016



Dear Concerned Citizen,



Thank you for your recent letter roundly criticizing our treatment of

the Taliban and Al Quada detainees currently being held at Guantanamo

Bay, Cuba. Our administration takes these matters seriously and your

opinion was heard loud and clear here in Washington.



You'll be pleased to learn that, thanks to the concerns of citizens

like yourself, we are creating a new division of the Terrorist

Retraining Program, to be called the "Liberals Accept Responsibility

for Killers" program, or LARK for short.



In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided

to place one terrorist under your personal care. Your personal

detainee has been selected and scheduled for transportation under

heavily armed guard to your residence next Monday.



Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud (you can just call him Ahmed) is to be

cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your

letter of complaint. It will likely be necessary for you to hire some

assistant caretakers.



We will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of

care for Ahmed are commensurate with those you so strongly recommended

in your letter.



Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your

sensitivity to what you described as his attitudinal problem" will

help him overcome these character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in

describing these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand

that your plan is to offer counseling and home schooling.



Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat

and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or

nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these

skills at your next yoga group. He is also expert at making a wide

variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you

may wish to keep those items locked up, unless (in your opinion) this

might offend him.



Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters (except

sexually), since he views all females as a subhuman form of property.

This is a particularly sensitive subject for him and he has been known

to show violent tendencies around women who fail to comply with the

new dress code that he will recommend as more appropriate attire.



I'm sure you will come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka --

over time.



Just remember that it is all part of "respecting his culture and his

religious beliefs". Wasn't that how you put it?



Thanks again for your letter. We truly appreciate it when folks like

you keep us informed of the proper way to do our job. You take good

care of Ahmed - and remember, we'll be watching.



Good luck!



Cordially, your friend,



GEORGE W. BUSH


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 16, 2006, 8:35 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


N.S. knife robber goes to jail

by

Oh , let the boy go, it's the knife's fault. Ban knives!


--------------------------------------------------------------

N.S. knife robber goes to jail
Date: Dec 16, 2006 10:22 AM
PUBLICATION: Times & Transcript (Moncton)
DATE: 2006.12.16
PAGE: A11
BYLINE:
SECTION: NEWS
WORD COUNT: 103

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

N.S. knife robber goes to jail

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

A Cape Breton teenager who held a knife to a girl's neck during a
robbery has been sent to a detention centre for a year after pleading
guilty to various charges.

The 16-year-old Sydney youth, a father of one child, pleaded guilty to
two counts of robbery and two counts of taking a motor vehicle without
consent.

He also admitted to assault with a weapon - a knife - and uttering a
threat.

The assault involved holding a knife to a 12-year-old girl's neck during
a robbery. The girl happened to be in the store at the time of the
crime.

The youth must submit a DNA sample to the national registry and is
prohibited from possessing firearms for 10 years.

A crack cocaine addiction was blamed as the driving force behind his
crimes as he attempted to secure cash or other items to buy more drugs.




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 16, 2006, 3:33 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


AUSTRALIA: Be alarmed: army's lost weapons fiasco

by Nancy

AUSTRALIA: Be alarmed: army's lost weapons fiasco
Date: Dec 16, 2006 9:19 AM
THE SYDNEY MORNING HERALD - December 16, 2006
Be alarmed: army's lost weapons fiasco
By Craig Skehan, Les Kennedy and Sunanda Creagh
A STOLEN weapons scandal has embarrassed the Australian Defence Force,
which is refusing to disclose whether rocket launchers obtained by
criminals are from its stockpile - or even confirm that any are missing.
The Federal Opposition said gun laws had become a "meaningless joke" if
military-style weapons were available on the black market.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/armys-lost-weapons-fiasco/2006/12/15/1166162322935.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 16, 2006, 3:31 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


GUNS STOLEN FROM THE MILITARY: Only in Australia you say?

by

GUNS STOLEN FROM THE MILITARY: Only in Australia you say?
Date: Dec 16, 2006 9:37 AM
JANUARY 25, 2006 - TORONTO SUN: THE REAL STORY ON HOW ALL THOSE CRIME
GUNS GOT ONTO TORONTO STREETS -- AND THEY'RE NOT FROM THE HOMES OF
LEGITIMATE OWNERS BY MARK BONOKOSKI
According to Dr. Mauser, what rarely -- if ever -- gets reported is the
number of weapons with military or police origins which fall into
criminal hands. But, through Access to Information, this is what Mauser
discovered, and published in his study. On July 4, 2002, an RCMP report
listed 409 firearms that had been either lost or stolen from the
Canadian military, a list that included 218 Lee Enfield rifles and a
number of machine guns. But there were also 17 sidearms reported stolen
or missing -- all Browning 9mm pistols, a preferred street piece. None
of this ever made the news.
http://www.garrybreitkreuz.com/publications/2006/712.htm




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 16, 2006, 3:32 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


HANDGUN PROHIBITION AND THE ORINAL MEANING OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT

by Nancy

http://www.guncite.com/journals/kmich.html

The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 16, 2006, 3:24 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Letter: Liberal gun plan offends sport shooters

by Nancy

Letter: Liberal gun plan offends sport shooters
Date: Dec 15, 2006 8:46 AM
PUBLICATION: New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal
DATE: 2006.12.15
PAGE: A6
SECTION: OPINION

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Liberal gun plan offends sport shooters

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

The Liberal Party of Canada's resolution to support legislation to
eliminate the personal use of semi-automatic firearms is extremely
indicative of just how out of touch the Party has become with rural
Canadians and Sport Shooters from all walks of life.

It is stated on the LPC website that semi-automatic firearms do not
support the hunting culture found in Canada. How untrue this is. There
are thousands if not hundreds of thousands of this type of firearm
responsibly in use across our country. Also, and to no surprise, there
is no recognition of any form of legitimate shooting sports in Canada.
There are organized shooting sports in Canada that are recognized all
over the World.

As a competitive shooter, I am tired of the Liberal's attempts to
dismiss the shooting sports, the responsible owners, and of their
wasteful use of taxpayers dollars to erode and attempt to prohibit the
lawful and responsible use of firearms in Canada. Why is there not more
talk of crime prevention, investment in our police forces, and fighting
crime at its source? It is about time the Liberal Party comes up with
new ideas when it comes to crime prevention, rather than continue to
believe the adage that prohibition and restriction of the use of
firearms will cease violent crime in Canada. Time spent developing new
laws and legislation should be spent on more productive and effective
means of supporting Canadians.

In regards to statistics that are used to represent the amount of for
and against more gun control, it's pretty easy to poll a few hundred
Canadians from urban centres where crime rates are higher, especially
Canadians who don't own any type of firearm, potentially never would, so
why would they say they wouldn't support more gun control? Statistics
can be made to provide the answers one is seeking.

Whether you are a firearm owner or not, ask yourself exactly what is
wrong with what we as firearms owners do for our hobby and pastime. We
are almost forced to be ashamed of our sport because of the stigma of
guns being only for causing death. Guns are not socially acceptable.

We are breaking no laws, we are regular people just like you. Sadly, the
actions of criminals dictate how we as Canadian shooters are
represented. More laws and restrictions, along with possible prohibition
will effect who the most, do you think?

If you are a member of the Liberal Party, that's fine. Please don't buy
into everything the party is preaching, because not everything is gospel
just because someone tells you it is.

JODY WARING
Mascarene




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 15, 2006, 2:40 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Police officer shot by one of his own

by Nancy

Police officer shot by one of his own
Date: Dec 15, 2006 9:02 AM
PUBLICATION: Vancouver Sun
DATE: 2006.12.15
EDITION: Final
SECTION: News
PAGE: A1 / Front
BYLINE: Wency Leung and Darah Hansen, with files from Jeff Lee
SOURCE: Vancouver Sun
ILLUSTRATION: Graphic/Diagram: Vancouver Sun / AT THE SCENE:
Policeofficer was shot in the abdomen during a drug raid.
WORD COUNT: 443

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Police officer shot by one of his own

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

A New Westminster police officer suffered internal injuries Thursday
when he was shot in the abdomen by another police officer in a drug raid
that went terribly wrong.

The injured officer -- who has not been identified -- is expected to
recover, with police crediting the man's bulletproof vest for saving his
life.

The details of exactly what happened at a two-storey apartment building
at 727 Fourth Avenue weren't clear Thursday night as police continued to
investigate the matter.

Staff Sgt. Casey Dehaas of the New Westminster police department said
the shooting occurred at about 3:30 p.m. as officers from both the New
Westminster drug unit and integrated emergency response team converged
on the building to execute a drug warrant.

Sometime during that effort "there was a shot fired," Dehaas said.

Initially police would only confirm that one of their own was in
hospital with serious but non-life-threatening injuries from a bullet to
his abdomen.

In an update to media shortly after 7 p.m., Dehaas confirmed the shot
came from another officer's weapon.

Dehaas refused to identify the police officer involved in the shooting,
commenting, "the officer, to my understanding, is traumatized."

Dehaas said the injured officer was in plainclothes rather than a police
uniform at the time of the shooting. However, he would not say whether
that contributed to any confusion among police.

Dehaas had no information on why guns were drawn in the incident.

"Accidents do happen," he said.

"The biggest thing out of this investigation is [to find out] what
happened here. Let's make sure it doesn't happen again," he said.

Dehaas said he didn't believe the officer responsible for the shooting
would be suspended, adding the officer was given counselling support
Thursday.

The integrated emergency response team is made up of police from New
Westminster, Port Moody, Delta and Abbotsford.

The injured officer was treated at the scene by paramedics, then rushed
to Royal Columbian Hospital.

"He's going to be okay," said Dehaas.

Dehaas said the bulletproof vest under the officer's shirt prevented the
bullet from doing fatal harm. The shot was still powerful enough,
however, to cause severe bruising and other internal injuries.

The shooting took place at a ground-level apartment at a two-storey
apartment building. The dilapidated yellow building is surrounded by
three- and four-storey apartment buildings in one of New Westminster's
grittier high-density neighbourhoods.

Some neighbours in the area said the apartment was known for illegal
drug activity, involving crack, heroin and speed.

The shooting drew crowds to the area. At one point, as a forensics team
was continuing to collect evidence hours after the incident, a man drove
by and shouted to an officer guarding the front: "Give our best to your
guy!"

Police said several people were taken into custody after the shooting,
but Dehaas did not know whether any charges had resulted from the raid
as of Thursday night.

It was the second time in four years a New Westminster police officer
has been shot.

In March 2003, Const. Brian Knipstrom was shot in the leg after
responding to a 911 call at an apartment building on 11th Street near
Queens Avenue. A second officer was shot in the same incident but was
not injured because his bulletproof vest deflected the bullet.




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 15, 2006, 2:38 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Garry Breitkreuz's Speech to the Canadian Shooting Sports Association -

by Nancy :)

November 25, 2006
http://www.garrybreitkreuz.com/publications/2006_new/110.htm


The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 15, 2006, 2:35 PM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


Hunter's father proud of son's buck harvest

by Nancy


http://www.reformer.com/letters/ci_4836851

The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 15, 2006, 8:43 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home


BRITAIN: Owning a weapon is becoming a habit for rural homeowners

by Nancy

BRITAIN: Owning a weapon is becoming a habit for rural homeowners
Date: Dec 15, 2006 7:58 AM
The middle classes are tooling up
The First Post - December 14, 2006
Owning a weapon is becoming a habit for rural homeowners who feel
unprotected now that so many police stations have closed.
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=2&subID=1205




The Second Amendment IS Homeland Security !

Posted on Dec 15, 2006, 8:42 AM

Respond to this message   

Goto Forum Home

Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2010 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement