| Original Message |
SW
Posted Nov 11, 2009 12:16 PM
FIRST AND FORMOST WE HAVE TO REMIND OURSELVES THAT THE WAR IN AFGANISTAN IS IN FACT A NATO OPERATION AND WE NEED TO GET THE OTHER COUNTRIES TO PULL THERE WIEGHT RATHER THAN THE BACKSLIDING AND LACK OF COMMITMENT WE HAVE AT THE MOMENT. ALAS I FEAR OUR GOVERNMENT IS INCAPABLE OF DOING THIS.
WITH REGARD TO UK FORCES DEPLOYED IN THEATER, TOO LITTLE AND A SHORTAGE OF KIT PROHIBITS HOLDING GROUND AND GETS PEOPLE KILLED. SURE WE CAN CLEAR VALLEYS AND VILLAGES, THIS COST LIVES, BUT AS SOON AS WE PULL BACK TERRY IS BACK IN AGAIN. SIR RICHARD DANNET ASKED MCRUIN FOR 2000 EXTRA TROOPS WHEN HE WAS CNC, THE GOVERNMENTS RESPONCE WAS YOU CAN HAVE A COUPLE OF HUNDRED. YOU CANT GO TO WAR ON A SHOE STRING BUDGET. THIS IS VERY MUCH A WINNABLE WAR, THE ONLY THING THAT IS MISSING IS GOVERNMENT COMMITMENT.
FAR TOO MANY HAVE DIED OR BEEN WOUNDED BY IED'S WHY? BECAUSE THE LADS HAVE TO TRAVEL IN UNSUITABLE TRANSPORT INSTEAD OF HELOS. THIS COULD AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN SORTED BEFORE DEPLOYING. EVERYTIME I SEE THAT CUNT AINSWORTH TELLING THE PUBLIC THE ARMY HAS EVERYTHING IT NEEDS I GET THE URGE TO SMASH HIS STUPID FACE IN WITH A CLAW HAMMER. WHY WOULD ANY PRIME MINISTER PUT A MAN WITH NO EXPERIENCE OF THE ARMED FORCES IN CHARGE OF THE MOD IT BEGGERS BELIEF. AND THEN THE USELESS CUNT COMPOUNDS THE ISSUE BY IGNORING THE CHIEFS OF STAFF'S ADVICE AND DOING IT HIS WAY MEANWHILE TROOPS DIE. IT WOULD BE LAUGHABLE IF IT WASN'T SO SERIOUS.
ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTLISTS HAVE TO BE STOPPED, TERRY HAS HUGE AREAS OF PAKISTAN UNDER ITS CONTROL AND THE MOVEMENT IS GATHERING STRENGH FROM DAY TO DAY. SHOULD THEY EVER GAIN CONTROL OF PAKISTAN, A NUCULER POWER IT DOES NOT BARE THINKING ABOUT.
SO I SAY FIGHT ON AND DESTROY THE TALABAN WHEREVER THEY ARE. JUST GIVE US THE KIT TO DO THE JOB AND WIPE THEM FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.
SORRY FOR THE RAMBLE. |
|
