Agreed, there is a lot of published golf information not in consonance with science. However, it is rare that a scientist who is also a well known fighter pilot publishes a book on golf offering a startling theory which is completely contrary to accepted concepts. The book becomes a best seller. Golf scientists ignore it and say nothing. It could have happened that way. If it did, the golf media were remiss in not seeking contrasting views from other scientists. Presumably, golf scientists would have deigned to answer questions. Note: I think of Blake as being more an engineer/inventor rather than a scientist, though his publishers billed him as a physicist, scientist or lecturer in physics. SD
Need a free spelling checker add-on for Internet Explorer ? ieSpell ;After installing, just Right-Click on your message word and select Check Spelling. BobKy.
