Frankly, not my thing. i love some of ur existing pams though (217, 127 and 372).April 3 2012 at 3:06 AM
JBS (Login stingerstingray)
from IP address 220.127.116.11
Response to LUVIN the PAM 438. Anyone else agree?
For a ceramic model, I d love to acquire a 26 some day. A base ceramic rad or luminor would b a big winner for me. Btw, I also prefer a pam w/o a bracelet.
219; Pam382 'Bronzo'; (Pam112 & Rolex GMT MasterII - RIP)