Now that the 233 and 270 in-house movements are here, how many of you are saving up to get one of these over the old versions (88 or 63 or others)? Anyone prefer the older gmt's over the new ones?

my 63C only because I can't swing the 270...

One day...

S





"...we storm like the Devil!" - Unknown

Yeah, my heart was set on a 63C too. But now I'm thinking 233 or 270. In-house movement and cool 1950 case and clean dial.

Still like the 63C, but now I'm looking at ways to try and afford the newer gmt!

and I even spelled all my words right in this reply!

I think...



Good luck, Hoser!

S





"...we storm like the Devil!" - Unknown

there have been 20 or more various models and or styles over the last 10 years, I prefer the older ones like the Pam 63's, Pam 29's, Pam 237 and the like. I've seen the 233, 270, 320, and the rest of the newer In-House ones but IMHO they don't have the class or style of the older Pam's and I have little to no faith in the new Panerai In-House movements. Just because a movement is designed and made "in-house", in the broadest sense of the word "In-House" in this case, does NOT mean it is in any way, shape or form better than an non in-house movement.