<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

If you could only own one ...

March 11 2017 at 10:50 PM
Howard Lazarus  (Login ALVEOLUS)
from IP address 148.188.192.60

PAM 587 or PAM 687, and why?

Thanks in advance for your thoughts!

happy.gif

hml

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply

Paddy
(Premier Login Kingsholm14)
High Heid Yin
172.3.54.82

687. Unique and reminds me of Eng. It's a stunner. Hi Howard x. Nt

March 11 2017, 11:11 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   
Howard Lazarus
(Login ALVEOLUS)
148.188.192.60

Hey Paddy!

March 12 2017, 7:08 AM 

Miss you guys and trust all is well. happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
Carl
(Login carlscott)
81.99.60.32

597 v 697

March 11 2017, 11:14 PM 

The 587 is a classic with out trying to be anything else.
The 687 is a copy of something else.
my own opinion so please no offence meant...

 
 Respond to this message   

372Love
(Login 11years)
Paneristi
24.3.151.113

Interesting

March 12 2017, 3:27 AM 

Interesting perspective, although I think the 687 is more of a tribute , since the original was made by Panerai also.
By your rationale the Omega Speedmaster is a copy of the original , the Rolex Submariner is a copy....and on and on.
If a different brand recreated it, I would agree....but the old watch was a Panerai and the new one is as well... No copy.
Just offering my differing view.
____________________________________________

 
 Respond to this message   
Beef
(Login FLS2K)
Paneristi
47.202.22.144

I'll let you know when I see a 687, but I think I know the answer. 😃

March 11 2017, 11:14 PM 


 
 Respond to this message   
George
(Login gdaso)
71.90.205.31

My choice...

March 12 2017, 12:25 AM 

[linked image]

 
 Respond to this message   
JohnFM7
(Login hesalitedome)
73.92.107.83

587

March 12 2017, 1:01 AM 

I'm new to Panerai, so don't hesitate to discount my opinion! To my eye, the 587 is simple, classic, and understated ... if that's possible on a 47mm watch! Plus, there's something about those two words, 'Marina Militare' wink.gif

The 687 is certainly more eye-catching, with its 'sunburst' dial and striking bezel. For me, the 587 is striking enough with its large and rugged, yet refined, look.

Let us know what you decide!

 
 Respond to this message   
Hiro
(Login hiroshikato1)
Paneristi
74.66.88.61

Howard!

March 12 2017, 4:12 AM 

I personally like the 587. In my eyes I feel like the 687 is trying to recreate something very unique and special. In Porsche terms, I think the 587 is the 991.2 GT3 with a manual transmission while the 687 would be a 997.2 GT3 with manual transmission, body stripes, houndstooth seats and rear wing delete. BTW, I ended up selling my 997.1 GT3 for a 991.1 GT3. Hope all is well Howard! I figured Porsche comparisons would be good for you! Hiro

 
 Respond to this message   
Howard Lazarus
(Login ALVEOLUS)
148.188.192.60

Gotta luv the GT3!

March 12 2017, 7:07 AM 

I'm thinking that the 587 is most akin to my 997.2 GT3. I'll take them both out for a sunny day spin some day soon and get back to you - thx Hiro! happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   

Marius
(Login Viper-FFM)
Paneristi
176.199.56.44

Re: If you could only own one ...

March 12 2017, 2:04 PM 

587 all the way as the 687 is historically not a Panerai build.

 
 Respond to this message   

Rapers
(Login rapers)
Paneristi
86.23.28.49

587 please.......

March 12 2017, 4:38 PM 

I used to own a PAM356, but quickly tired of the faux patina numbers and markers and swapped it for a PAM89.
With that in mind, I'm afraid a whole dial-full of faux patina just doesn't attract me at all.
IMHO PAM587 is a classic example of the KISS principle.

 
 Respond to this message   
Howard Lazarus
(Login ALVEOLUS)
98.246.45.252

Very helpful!

March 12 2017, 5:28 PM 

I have often struggled with faux patina and your guidance here is very insightful. Thx Rapers!

 
 Respond to this message   
Kamstrup
(Login kamstrup)
Paneristi
5.103.182.154

For me - 587 all the way.....

March 12 2017, 8:27 PM 

Why, because I have one happy.gif

[linked image]

The 587 is my daily beater, and it goes under the radar, with it's simple dial but at the same time totally "bad-a.."
And second, I'm not a fan of the writing on the bezel, I know it was made on a proto-type, but maybe there is a reason it never went further than that.
To me it is like "RolexRolexRolex" on the inside of the dial, taken a bit to far..
Just my 2 cents

Kamstrup

 
 Respond to this message   

Dave
(Login peezie)
Paneristi
24.107.94.206

389. Dream piece.

March 12 2017, 10:39 PM 

176L

 
 Respond to this message   
Antonyuk
(Login Antonyuk)
94.10.228.12

Pam687 all day!

March 12 2017, 11:21 PM 

Ive got the 687 on order only seeing pictures but on friday was lucky enough to seenit in the flesh at private veiwing in london and it is so much nicer than i expected the dial is just amazing!!

 
 Respond to this message   
Frendrick
(Login frendrick)
Paneristi
23.27.245.111

I'll take 587

March 13 2017, 3:23 AM 

the 687 is a bit too much IMO. that engraved bezel and the striking dial is exciting but a bit too much. If I have both, I think I'll wear the 587 most of the time.

 
 Respond to this message   
Pam673
(Login Pam673)
110.142.83.27

Re: If you could only own one ...

March 13 2017, 4:52 AM 

I would go for the 587 with the simple black MM dial.

687 is nice but I think the tropical dial hype will fade off in time.

 
 Respond to this message   
AngelitoJN
(Login ANGELITOJN)
Paneristi
77.224.183.155

First 687, second 673 and ....

March 13 2017, 11:23 AM 

.... if you can't get 673 then third 587.
Why not ?? Try again !!

 
 Respond to this message   
Aris
(Login aridim1)
2.87.210.185

It depends from your current collection.

March 13 2017, 4:38 PM 

If you have some pieces, then the 687 will give you a nice twist.
Otherwise the 587 represents the values of the brand better.
Aris

 
 Respond to this message   
 
< Previous Page 1 2 Next >
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index