<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

The dimensions of the 587 (or similar)

March 17 2017 at 8:46 AM

Martin  (Login m8rtwatches)
from IP address 213.66.223.118

Hello guys and gals,

Long time lurker from Swedens budding Paneristi-community, but now it's time to get a bit more active here. I'll start with a simple question. happy.gif

I'll turn 40 in a few months and the 587 is on top of the list (my wife is very aware of this fact), but there are few chances of actually trying one out before buying in my part of the world, so I need some measurements to have a better estimate if this watch will work well on my wrist. I know that the 372 is 47 x 57 x 16 mm. I've heard that the 587 is slightly shorter, like 56,6 mm, can anyone confirm this? And, is it the same thickness as the 372, although the case is slightly different?

Best,
Martin

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Kamstrup
(Login kamstrup)
Paneristi
5.103.182.154

Not so different sizewise......

March 17 2017, 4:04 PM 

I measure my 587 to be as the 372 - 47x57

I don't have my 372 any more, but as I recal, no noticeable difference in thickness.

But two very different watches when you see them next to each other (as you probably have seen countless times already) but just in case, another comparison shot:

[linked image]

Should you happen to get near Copenhagen, let me know, and then we can meet up. Then you can try my 587.

Kamstrup

 
 Respond to this message   

Martin
(Login m8rtwatches)
213.66.223.118

Great!

March 17 2017, 4:28 PM 

... nice comparison shot. I have seen some before, but this was a bit more detailed. Thank you. What about the thickness?

 
 Respond to this message   
Beef
(Login FLS2K)
Paneristi
47.202.22.144

Thickness...

March 17 2017, 4:39 PM 

372; 16.4mm
587; 16mm
Sunny Florida, USA

photo IMG_2079_zpsgr4klm3g.jpeg

photo 9446FF63-7C01-482A-8BB3-C00B91524939_zps7iwrrt8d.jpg

photo DF4A95AE-7B14-403F-868F-9083B964C359_zpslc0lu9na.jpg

 
 Respond to this message   

Martin
(Login m8rtwatches)
213.66.223.118

Fantastic. Thank you!

March 17 2017, 4:53 PM 

So ... everything points towards a 587 for me. happy.gif

 
 Respond to this message   
 
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index