<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>View more postings  

Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!

April 9 2006 at 6:18 AM
No score for this post
Joanne Smith  (no login)

Well, it looks as if Peter Rydyn has found himself a new target - William Shatner! Apparently, he believes that Shatner's wife was murdered!

He was planning a press conference on March 22, but though there was plenty of info online about the planned conference (including the details that he was planning to hold it on the bridge of the Starship Enterprise and he was planning to invite the LAPD), I couldn't find anything to indicate that the conference had taken place!

Rydyn is also apparently still working on Natalie's case. He's now decided that Natalie's and Bill Holden's deaths are inextricably linked - and has conveniently delayed the publication of his book on the case to accomodate this new information!

TBH, I think he makes Dennis Davern look like a fine, upstanding citizen! And the fact that he appears not to have a single published book to his name (despite claiming that there are several 'due for publication') doesn't exactly instill confidence in him or his theories!

Joanne

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Olivia
(no login)

Re: Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!

No score for this post
April 9 2006, 8:39 PM 

Poor guy obviously has nothing else to do.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Vlad
(Login vladislaus)

Re: Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!

No score for this post
April 10 2006, 2:03 PM 

I do not know much about peter rydyn but who are we to say all this is not true how do we know shatner did not kill his wife or robert blake for that much how do we know that there is not more to natalies death non of us were there, do you think oj is innocent?. let the dude do what he has to who knows maybe he will hit on something in nats case i hope so.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Joanne Smith
(no login)

Re: Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!

No score for this post
April 10 2006, 4:46 PM 

Vlad

The point is, this man has made a career out of 'investigating' so called celeb 'Murders' and coming up with little or no concrete evidence that a 'murder' occured! He also claims to have written several books, yet not a single one has been published. And when he's asked about this, he comes over all vague - I suspect that he couldn't produce a publishable manuscript if his life depended upon it!

Sorry, Vlad, but I wouldn't bother championing this man - he's someone with way too much time on his hands (he spent 10 years 'investigating' Richard Burton's 'murder' - despite the fact that Burton actually died of a brian hemorrage! Basically, there was no 'murder', but that didn't stop Rydyn concocting one!).

BTW - Ironically, the Blake and OJ Simpson cases are two cases that Rydyn hasn't investigated - presumably because they were actual murders and not the result of accident, suicide or natural causes!

Joanne

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(no login)

Natalie Wood

No score for this post
April 13 2006, 1:08 PM 

Contact me anytime for details. Look at my website www.retributor.com

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
nwf
(no login)

Re: Natalie Wood

No score for this post
April 13 2006, 3:04 PM 

i checked....a complete waste of time...as i thought it would be....doesnt anyone die a natural death????

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Joanne Smith
(no login)

Re: Natalie Wood

No score for this post
April 13 2006, 7:20 PM 

Also, the site tells us nothing about the 'evidence' you claim to have found, or the contents of your books. As for publication dates etc - again, little or no information. And whenever anyone does try and ask you about any of your 'cases', you just tell them to check out your website!

I don't believe for one moment that Natalie was murdered and I doubt very much that you have turned up any reliable evidence to back up this 'theory'. As for the connection with Bill Holden's death - the only connection between the two is that their partners worked together. Also, Bill Holden was a hopless alcoholic who was so out of it on the day he died that he didn't realise he was bleeding to death! No mystery there as far as I'm concerned - just a sad, intoxicated old man who slipped and gashed his head.

Incidentally, as someone has already said, famous people have been known to die as the result of illness, accident or suicide. Boring, I know, but true!

Joanne

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Vlad
(Login vladislaus)

Re: Natalie Wood

No score for this post
April 14 2006, 10:12 AM 

Once again let the guy do what he has to do, who knows, maybe he will find something. Joanne do you think Marylin Monroe's death was not a homicide? if you think it was overdose you need a reality check one more thing Dr. Noguchi did rule MM's death as a homocide but things changed as it did in natalies case also.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Olivia
(no login)

Re: Natalie Wood

No score for this post
April 14 2006, 5:19 PM 

I DO think that Monroe's death was a homicide. But I just have a problem with people seeming to think that everything has to do with foul play. I don't think the circumstances surrounding Natalie's death ( ugh..I hate to even write that) did not occur as reported, but I don't believe she was intentionally killed.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Joanne Smith
(no login)

Re: Natalie Wood

No score for this post
April 14 2006, 5:43 PM 

Vlad

Actually, I do think Marilyn's death warrents more investigation and could well have been due to foul play. However, just because Marilyn's death may have been due to foul play, does not mean that Natalie was also murdered.

Peter Rydyn thinks every celeb death is a homicide - yet strangely he hasn't looked into Marilyn's, which would be a prime candidate for a 'suspicious' death.

As far as I can see, he takes deaths due to natural causes, illness or accident and turns them into homicides. In his world, no death is accidental or due to illness or suicide! That alone should make anyone suspicious of him and his methods.

I know how much you desperately want Natalie's death to have been a homicide, but putting your faith in Peter Rydyn is not a good idea.

Joanne

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Vlad
(Login vladislaus)

Re: Natalie Wood

No score for this post
April 17 2006, 9:42 AM 

Joanne, all I want is the truth. I feel (my opinion) that we all have been mislead on natalie's case.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Joanne Smith
(no login)

Re: Natalie Wood

No score for this post
April 17 2006, 6:17 PM 

Well, I wouldn't be banking on Peter Rydyn to provide it!

Incidentally, I don't think we've been 'misled'. I'm guessing we don't know the whole story (with regards to what the argument was about etc), but I don't think anyone has been 'misled'.

At the end of the day, a full investigation was undertaken and an autopsy done on Natalie's body.

I feel that a lot of people can't accept that Natalie's death was a tragic accident - she must have died by foul play, because movie stars don't die as a result of accidents or illness! Unfortunately, they do! But that doesn't interest the media or the bereft fans!

Joanne

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!

No score for this post
July 4 2009, 2:13 PM 

here's another!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!

No score for this post
July 4 2009, 2:15 PM 

Quoting Joanne: "TBH, I think he makes Dennis Davern look like a fine, upstanding citizen! And the fact that he appears not to have a single published book to his name (despite claiming that there are several 'due for publication') doesn't exactly instill confidence in him or his theories!"

At least she made some sense here. Joanne, face it...there are many GOOD, MORAL actors to idolizing. You're a reasonable person. If Davern can PROVE to you what needs to be established, would you, could you, change your mind?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!

No score for this post
July 4 2009, 5:00 PM 

I don't believe any of these are Joanne from the RJ group. You are all liars. Hate fill liars and I saw that Vlad guy's posts. I hate him. this is probably his doing. I hate all of you.
Robert Wagner is the greatest man on Earth. I hate you.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!

No score for this post
July 4 2009, 6:41 PM 

Believe it, idiot. Search Joanne's name at the RJGroup and you will see that she has on several occaions visited here, as she admits herself. It's simple. Write in Joanne in the search box, click GO, and voila: You will read JOanne's posts at the RJGroup saying that she comes here occasionally.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!

No score for this post
July 4 2009, 7:48 PM 

shut up shut shut up lies all lies

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Peter Rydyn Strikes Again!
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>View more postings  
Your Ad Here