<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>View more postings  

New book release is being cancelled

June 30 2009 at 7:54 PM
No score for this post
Wagners  (no login)

I have a major news flash. My asociates in Hollywood have informed me that the release of the book by Davern has been cancelled due to a litigation pending. No new release date has been issued until after the trial.
Over and out!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: New book release is being cancelled

No score for this post
June 30 2009, 8:30 PM 

10-4, good buddy!!

Go away.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: New book release is being cancelled

No score for this post
July 1 2009, 12:05 AM 

LOL...LOL, LOL...what does Wagner or "the Wagners" have to hide?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   

(no login)

Where does it say that?

No score for this post
July 1 2009, 4:07 AM 

I went on amazon.com to see if the book has been canceled. If it has, why can you still pre-order it? I think someone/something is wrong here?! Show me proof the book has been canceled. I bet you can't. Probably just wishful thinking or hoping no one would buy the book.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

simple reason on Amazon

No score for this post
July 1 2009, 6:30 AM 

There is a simple reason why you can still order Goodbye Natalie Goodbye Splendour on Amazon. It is still available for pre order which means this thread was started by a troll who will stop at nothing to make sure HER dear heartless Robert Wagner is shown in the best light possible and that includes making up garbage which is what SHE did. This is what SHE has done for years.
Hollywood associates? LOL The only Hollywood associates this bimbo has is her dealers and they forgot to fill her crack pipe this week!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Millicent Fenwick's boy toy
(no login)

Wagners, WTF?

No score for this post
July 1 2009, 6:20 AM 

Do you even know what the word LITIGATION means in regard to its legal definition? This is 01 July 09. There is not one shred of paperwork filed in conjunction with this book. If there was this would be public knowledge although the legalities of the suit in special cases may be kept private for the time being. Rather late in the game for anything like this to come to fruition. Last I heard all the legal mumbo jumbo in the world isn't stopping the publication of this book.
It pays to have a family member in law like I do, doncha' think?

LITIGATION - A case, controversy, or lawsuit. A contest authorized by law, in a court of justice, for the purpose of enforcing a right. Participants (plaintiffs and defendants) in lawsuits are called litigants.

The process of bringing and pursuing a lawsuit. Litigation often proceeds much like trench warfare; initial court papers define the parties' legal positions as trenches define battlefield positions. After the initial activity, lawyers sit back for several months or years and lob legal artillery at each other until they grow tired of the warfare and begin settlement negotiations. If settlement is unsuccessful (90+% of all lawsuits are settled without trial), the case goes to trial, and the trial may be followed by a lengthy appeal.

Many states have enacted, or are considering, reforms directed at shortening the time a case takes to get to trial and minimizing the expense traditionally associated with litigation. Among these reforms are:

'Fast track' rules that prohibit delays and require each phase of the case to be completed within a particular period of time;

Limits on how much information can be obtained from the opposing party;

Requirements that certain types of cases be arbitrated (a simpler procedure) rather than pushed through the court system;

Requirements that attorneys inform their clients of alternative dispute resolution procedures such as mediation, and;

Court-sponsored techniques such as mini-trials and early neutral evaluation that are designed to get the parties to settle by giving them a realistic assessment of what is likely to happen if the case goes to trial.


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Wagners, WTF?

No score for this post
July 1 2009, 7:31 AM 

LOL. This "lawyer" who can't spell cease and lawsuit does not realize that posting this crap HELPS the book. I'm sure Davern will be grateful to you. Keep it up. Your DUMB AS A STUMP posts make you and Robert Wagner look very bad and make the book look like a must read! Keep up the good work. If Wagner's true attorneys were to see your posts they would wish that you would stop. They might even contact the Moderator of this site to ask him to tell you to stop impersonating Robert Wagner and his legal counsel. LOL. Maybe you will be the one who needs a lawyer. Make sure he or she can spell cease and lawsuit! Stupid fool!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

lawyer?

No score for this post
July 1 2009, 8:17 AM 

You can't spell associate and please explain this idiotic statement, "No new release date has been issued until after the trial." What the hell does that mean?
Over and out? Over and out this you imbecile!
LMFAO

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: lawyer?

No score for this post
July 1 2009, 10:38 AM 

I think we're finally going to see and learn that Wagner and his croonies are no where near as smart as the authors and producers of this new book. Yes, the poster here is helping. I just checked the sales rankings of the new book and they are soaring. They are probably praising the fool who posted this initial post. LMFAO, too.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Millicent Fenwick's boy toy
(no login)

RJWfan and Vlad

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 8:14 AM 

Is that you both over on IMDb trying to drum up business for Rulli and Davern's book? Someone under the name robertwagnernataliewoodw keeps posting about Rulli's blog! ROFL
Cool! Keep posting it! The more people that see it the more curiosity it invokes which means more people will seek out the book!
No publicity is bad publicity as long as they spell the names right!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: RJWfan and Vlad

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 8:19 AM 

you forgot to say over and out! LOL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Millicent Fenwick's boy toy
(no login)

Forgive me?

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 8:49 AM 

How could I forget something so official and important as that?
OVER AND OUT!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Wagners
(no login)

Re: RJWfan and Vlad

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 11:22 AM 

Thanks Joe C. now we have our conformation on you.

Wagners

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: RJWfan and Vlad

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 11:43 AM 

does this mean there is another order to seice and desist? will there be another lawsuite?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

conFORmation?

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 1:11 PM 


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Millicent Fenwick's boy toy
(no login)

learn how to spell

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 1:15 PM 

LOL You dumb twit! Learn how to spell before attempting your CONFIRMATION on anything!
ROFL Keep pulling names out of your ass!
ROFL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Wagners
(no login)

Now hear this

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 1:29 PM 

Now hear this!
As attorney for the Wagners I order his detractors to cease and desist at once or you will all end up behind bars in the biggest lawsuite in Hollywood History.
Get ready because it is coming.
Everyone on the Wagners team stop posting on here. We have enough for a grand jury endictment.
Thank You for all you team work.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Millicent Fenwick's boy toy
(no login)

ROFL

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 1:36 PM 

Hey Wagner's!
NOW HEAR THIS!
BITE ME!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Now hear this

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 1:43 PM 

Hollywood History? wow, capital H on history.

you spelled cease correctly this time, very good, but there is not "e" at the end of lawsuit. also, "the Wagners legal team" should read "the Wagner's legal team".
oh and by the way, look in your law books for the word "endictment". You may not find it. The word is indictment. You dumb twit, LOL.



 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Millicent Fenwick's toy boy
(no login)

Re: Now hear this

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 4:24 PM 

An attorney who makes an edict? What law book did you skim through? An order is an EDICT and a lawyer can NOT make an edict.
You are constantly spelling lawsuit incorrectly. Hello? Anyone home in that head you own? There is no E in lawsuit! Although, one will give you credit for finally spelling the word cease correctly.
Indictment, you buffoon. Not Endictment! I, the first letter is I not E. It is the ninth letter of the alphabet. You are aware of the alphabet, are you not? You seem to love the letter E. IE: lawsuit-E E-ndictment
Do you know what a Grand Jury is? I think not.
Wagner's Team. First person, possessive.
May I offer you just a tad of free advise? At the very least get a GED!


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Now hear this

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 12:00 AM 

The following post is the funniest I've ever read here. You did a good job. Maybe the other poster really is in love with the letter e. LMAO


An attorney who makes an edict? What law book did you skim through? An order is an EDICT and a lawyer can NOT make an edict.
You are constantly spelling lawsuit incorrectly. Hello? Anyone home in that head you own? There is no E in lawsuit! Although, one will give you credit for finally spelling the word cease correctly.
Indictment, you buffoon. Not Endictment! I, the first letter is I not E. It is the ninth letter of the alphabet. You are aware of the alphabet, are you not? You seem to love the letter E. IE: lawsuit-E E-ndictment
Do you know what a Grand Jury is? I think not.
Wagner's Team. First person, possessive.
May I offer you just a tad of free advise? At the very least get a GED!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: learn how to spell

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 1:31 PM 

LMFAO. how dumb can one person be? wagner's fans are probably wishing this twit would call it a day. this is better than a sit-com.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

wrong person

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 2:04 PM 

That not JoeC that is GailR from the RJLIST

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
A REAL RJ FAN
(no login)

Re: wrong person

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 2:26 PM 

I won't tell you my name because one of you crazy people will use it against me. I am a member of the RJ list and I am offended by the mention of our lovely group on this vulgar site. Leave us out of this. Leave poor Jessica out of this. Leave my friend Joanne out of this. Joanne does not post here. Neither does Jessica.
And for your information, that GailR person was a fake. She was really a person named Vlad trying to trick our group. He revealed himself as GailR. I saw it myself. We all witnessed it.
We are a nice group of RJ fans. Please leave us out of your immature activities. Grow up.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: wrong person

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 4:02 PM 

Vlad is not GailR. and you didn't see anything because there is nothing to see. He and me are the only real Natalie and RJ historians and people like you are jealous.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: wrong person

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 4:49 PM 

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: wrong person

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 12:05 AM 

Joanne DOES (or DID) post here. She accused Davern of murder. She asked Rulli if it's true she's publishing a book. She slides in and out of here looking for information. As for Jessica, she may be nice, but is not the brightest bulb of the Wagner fans. They are both blinded by Wagner. It's ok, people still love OJ Simpson, too. It happens with emotions. But don't tell us to leave you alone when all you worry about is that your idol will be exposed. If he had anything to do with Natalie's death, he deserves to be exposed, and there's nothing you can do about it. So, leave the idiots and decent people here alone, too. Stay in your blind world, and let us await the truth. You are all so afraid of truth that you come here? LOL...you are the ignorant ones.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

fraud

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 6:56 AM 

Those people claiming to be Joanne and Jessica are frauds! They are my friends and they would never post on this site. Joanne knows RJ personally. The person who posts that lawyer rubbish and calls themself Wagners is someone who also posts on the IMDB board all the time under different names.
Members of the RJ group come on other sites to see what people are talking about but we rarely post but this is ridiculous.
RJ Wagner is certainly aware of the book but he would never ask anyone, especially his vast group of attorneys to come on this site or any site for any reason.
Sign me, a devoted fan of the great RJ Wagner

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: fraud

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 7:15 AM 

Oh please, Joanne does not know Wagner personally. There is only one person on the Wagner group who knows him and it's not Joanne. I guess his fans are just like him, incapable to telling the truth.
And there is not a lawyer on the planet who would post on this site and ask you to "siece" and desist and threaten with an "endictment" LOL. Stupid fools!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: fraud

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 8:15 AM 

Joanne does know RJ personally. She has pictures to back it up and she has them on the RJ site. Other people on there know him too. A picture is worth a million words and they have proof. All there pictures are there with the great legend RJ.
RJ comes on the group and we tell him how wonderful he is and what an impact he has made on our lifes. RJ and his best friend Stephanie Powers come on the hart to hart site too. They don't come that often because they are busy with their career but they know we love them.
You don't know anything about them and what they do. You are probably that person saying you are the lawyer too. Another fraud. RJ would not have his lawyers come here. He gives the orders not them.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: fraud

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 8:24 AM 

He comes on the site and you tell him how wonderful he is? lol Another idiot with an IQ in the single digits!
Get out of here!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: fraud

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 9:13 AM 

Joanne met him ONCE when Love Letters was in the UK. That's a far cry from knowing him personally.
RJ did not speak too highly of his "best friend" in his book and by the way, it's Stefanie, not Stephanie. I guess I know a little more than you do, like the proper spelling of her name.
I suspect you are the person claiming to be the lawyer.
and it would be "their pictures", not "there pictures". And he has had an impact on your "lives", not your "lifes" Yes, you are the "lawyer" LOL. You need to spend less time on this site. GO BACK TO SCHOOL! LOL
By the way, there are a couple of fans who post here who know that RJ never posted to your group. NEVER. And neither has Stefanie. Yes, you are the same person who posted as the lawyer. Stupid fool, keep digging!


 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: fraud

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 9:19 AM 

Notice the lawyer stopped posting at the same time this new single digit IQ twit began posting. I wonder if they are the same person? LOL. This is hysterical although I'm sure that's not the poster's intention. FUNNY!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: fraud

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 11:10 AM 

blady blady blady The Wagners will put a stop to this because RJ rules and everyone loves him.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: fraud

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 12:26 PM 

"blady" ? What the hell is that supposed mean. It means having blades. Go back to school.
And "wagners" probably wishes YOU would stop as you give the impression that all his fans are as dumb and mentally challenged as you are.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

blady blady blady? Vlad is that you?

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 12:54 PM 

sounds like you

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

to the illiterate wagners

No score for this post
July 2 2009, 3:56 PM 

You are spelling wrong again. It isn't Joe C. it is Josie and the Pussycats.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: to the illiterate wagners

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 8:25 AM 

Maybe it is the Ballad of Josie?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: to the illiterate wagners

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 9:25 AM 

Joanne HAS come here. She even said so at the RJGroup. She said she used to come here. That is definitely HER post accusing Davern of the more likely one to have killed Natalie. Joanne lives in a fantasy world. ANYTHING to protect her idol...ANYTHING to not face the fact that her idol most likely had everything to do with his wife's demise. I see more intellect here (excepting this particular thread) than anywhere.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: to the illiterate wagners

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 9:45 AM 

Joanne used to post here all the time. She was Wagner's biggest defender, living in a fantasy world.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: to the illiterate wagners

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 10:16 AM 

That was not Joanne. That person is was a fraud. It was probably you. Joanne would never post here and you are a liar. She never said she posted on this board and you know it.
You better stop making stories up or get alawyer.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: to the illiterate wagners

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 12:22 PM 

LOL. You seem consumed with lawyers. Joanne was a regular here. As a matter of fact she one that logged in. Perhaps Joanne will retain the same counsel that "wagners" retained and we will be asked to "seice and desist" along the threat of an "endictment" Stupid fool! LOL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Joanne?

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 12:51 PM 

Joanne is friends with RJ? ROFL Are you referring to that fat little troll from the UK who posted an old photograph of herself sandwiched in between Stefanie Powers and Robert Wagner on the RJ list?
ROFL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Joanne?

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 2:39 PM 

lol oh no you didn't just call Joanne a fat little troll! way2funy!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Joanne?

No score for this post
July 3 2009, 4:28 PM 

Search Joanne's name here. Just look at all of her posts! And, YES, she said at the RJGroup that she came here...search her posts there...you'll see it. I won't do the search for you. It's simple, and being you are so "simple" it shouldn't be too difficult a task. Search then resist. LMAO

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Joanne?

No score for this post
July 4 2009, 12:39 PM 

You brought it up. You prove it. You can't that is why you want me to go looking through all this junk. You know she would never post on here and she never posted all the lie s you said she did on the group either.
You are the liar not us.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Joanne?

No score for this post
July 4 2009, 12:48 PM 

Bull! You know Joanne posted here. Go back to the RJlist and look up the archives. I know you are on that site and you know I know it too. Don't press your luck around here. Your posts are there too and you know they are. Why should anyone do your work for you? The OP stated where to find the posts. Don't try and wriggle out of it like you do on other sites and the moderators are too dumb not to see right through your lies.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Joanne?

No score for this post
July 4 2009, 10:11 PM 

I do not know that but I do know that you are all liars. If you are a fan of Natalie Wood then you have to love RJ too and if you don't love him then you are not a fan of Natalie's either.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Joanne?

No score for this post
July 4 2009, 11:12 PM 

Ok, I think we're dealing with a 12 year old here...maybe less.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Joanne?

No score for this post
July 5 2009, 6:20 AM 

I know many fans of Wagner who are not fans of Natalie. Don't be ridiculous. Liking one does not mean we have to like the other. Grow up. That's the mentality of a child and besides, Wagner SUCKS as an actor.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - New book release is being cancelled
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>View more postings  
Your Ad Here