If you take a moment to review our past posting history you will see that in the Fall semester some of my former Law Students are holding mock adjudications, arraignment/ preliminary hearings and trials of four well known Hollywood deaths which many feel have a very mysterious air to them. One of the subjects will be the death of the actress Natalie Wood in November 1981.
We have been keeping up with the threads and posts on this site as well as other sites and most if not all come up rather ludicrous and I must say your initial post claiming to have read the manuscript made us doubtful also. Now, we have noticed that you corrected yourself in regard to an admitted previous error. To my students, this sheds an entirely different light upon you.
This may appear to be a throw away, irrelevant question but I assure you it is grounded in reason. We would like to know if the book has a dedication and if you are at liberty to reveal who it is dedicated too.
Respectfully,
PK

I have read your previous posts. There is nothing that prohibits me from telling you the book's dedication except my very own conscious and integrity but I will tell you this; The book is dedicated to the only person deserving of the dedication.

PROVE IT!

Soon enough it will be proven. Of course you are not going to buy the book, right? LMAO. You will be first in line at the bookstore on September 1.

Prove it? I think the guy already did. Did you read his other posts? I think your problem is you are going green with envy knowing there are people out there that read the book and just might be part of something you would kill to become a part of but they laugh at you.
You can deny it all you want with your prove it lines and LOLs and your 6 million different screen names but the truth is you are jealous.
I think the green eyed monster of envy done got you by the old short hairs and won't let go!

LMAO LOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
They must be pissing green with jealousy.

Dedicated "too"?

*Is that all you got? Tsk! Tsk!
The OP of the thread is obviously well aware of what s/he is talking about as it is also obvious that s/he is educated "also" but you have the cattiness to correct a slip of the adverb "too" as opposed to the preposition "to"? Spare me your unnecessary claws! Have you seen the abominations in spelling and grammar from the "fanofvlad" brigade and their slovens?

*Yes, I am fully aware that the first sentence is an example of what I called an abomination...in grammar and the second is what is commonly known as a run on sentence.
Please note the use of "also" which is correct as I am referring to "in addition too"...

too two 2? who cares? The point is the guy asked a question in a decent way and got stupid **** for screwing up a word with one more o Big cup cakes! How come nobody ever corrects my crap on here and I know I cant type for **** and my grammer and spelling is whack.
**** now everybody is going to start correcting me. Just remember who side Im on.

Obviously the original poster is one of the most intelligent and articulate people to post here. To compare him to the Wagner dunce brigade is ridiculous.

Equally obvious is the fact that Eduardo was not comparing my post with the "Wagner Dunce brigade" but he was making the distinction between my post and the "fanofvlad brigade".
I thank him for making that distinction and the next time my students or I post here we will be sure to bring along our editing department and our paralegal team. We wouldn't want to upset the Mensa and Rhodes Scholars running rampant on this site.
to-too? Absurd!

LOL. Yes, I tend to shy away from posting here due to the presence of the Mensa crowd who congregate here. One can see the advanced intellectual gifts of the Wagner fans. And there is a lawyer who posts here. She told us to "seise" and desist. Those fancy legal terms totally confuse me. I can see how you might be intimidated.

LOL

oooops, it must be catchy. I typed the there instead of their. LOL

That is right. I am a Mensa graduate and part of the illustrious team Wagners and you are all in for a rude awakeining come September when a new wind blows through and the truth will be astoundingly typified. Get ready.

Gordon, my compatriot! What year did you complete your studies? Were you on a scholarship? Mine was through the Peter Booris Foundation for Education.
How great to meet up with a fellow Mensa in one of the strangest places; this web site!
I wonder if we know each other? Did you study at the time time as the famed actress, Geena Davis? I was a few years ahead of her.
So wonderful to see that you are a top dog for Team Wagner!
Sorry, people! With that last sentence, I can't do this with a straight face and clear conscious. As a child I was taught never to look down upon the less fortunate and ignorant.

To coin a word I"ve decided to steal outright from an OP; Yentru... you are about to be "shredded"! How dare you come on here and post the following sentence? "Did you study at the time time as the famed actress, Geena Davis?"
"time time"? Ugh!... and you call yourself a Mensa? Turn that sheepskin in at once!


PS-See? I told you this could be fun at times. Great way to relieve stress and thumb your nose at the plebians and a few Calvinists, I fear.

All for your benefit my love.

This is fun? My dentist appointment this morning was fun. This is just excruciating.

Gordon, do you know what Mensa is? LMAO!!!

WTF does this mean?
September when a new wind blows through and the truth will be astoundingly typified.
Dude even I know thats just a ****ed up statement and I barely made it out of high school.

Gordon, "astoundingly typified"? What law book does that come from?

Look it up. Vlad's message is he does not do other people's homework. He got where he is in the entertainment world with hard work and you should try it knowitall instead of relying on other people's knowlege.

suck cheeze

The only thing obvious is the fact that fanofvlad and team Wagner know what they are talking about and the rest of you dont.
Look up compendimum actions in a law book and you will see that they know exactly how the law works.

LMAO, this is gonna be good! Why don't you should us? We must have an ignorance of the law. While you are at it, Gordon, LOLOL, you might want to show us "seice and desist" Go ahead, break out those law books and tell us all about the "compendimum actions" and "seise and desist". Scan it for us, show us the brilliance of the "team Wagner".
By the way, is "dont" another word in team Wagner's law books? I have never seen it written that way. With my ignorance I always include an apostrophe. That must be another word that the team Wagner and Vlad are aware of that the rest of us have never seen.

What does this mean? "Why don't you should us?" Do you mean show us? The little old Natalie Wood historian from the east coast does not like it when she is corrected.

At least her posts make sense. Yours are just stupid team Wagner.

They do not make sense. She is not an authority on Natalie. The only authority is RJ and Vlad.
Vlad does not act like he knows everything but he will learn. Miss Knowitall thinks everything she says is the last word. She got it all out of old movie magazines. She loved RJ. Now because of M**** R**** she hates him.

and he is writing a book about her? LOL

Hey stupid! The term is compendium OF actions not "compendimum actions. You better let the team Wagner in on this before they go to court with the "compendimum actions" LMAO! It gets better every day!

Hey there OP who asked why nobody cracks on him because his "spelling is whack". It is a good thing we know what side of the fence you are on or we'd send in the "Wagner team" to get on you and they'd begin "compendimum actions" against you...OOPS! sorry that is "TEAM WAGNER" lead by fanofvlad for "exhaulted" Vlad!
Just because you can't spell, your posts are laced with censored expletives and at times your elocution is beyond comprehension, we still love you!
As Rocky said to Madge; Rock on! LOL (inside joke here)

the TEAM WAGNER will have check some of the big words you used in that big book called a Dictionary. I can't see them making it through the second paragraph without the big book. You used big words!
Please stop mentioning the "compendimum actions". It frightens me. I lost sleep over the dreaded "compendimum actions".

How did the compendium postings go from one thread to another? Please take the time out from your busy schedules and find a job or possibly a hobby that will take you out into the fresh air and sunshine.
A word for the spurious lawyers on this board; An individual can not be charged with a compendium action. The reasoning is quite simple. There is no such law mandated in the United States. In layman's term, there is no such charge! An individual can be charged with a crime which shows a compendium of their alleged wrongdoing.
My students and I would be most engaged in finding the Law Book and exact text you derived a "Compendium Action" law from and *its complete definition.


*Ah, and before anyone attempts a grammatical correction:
It's is a contraction for it is or it has.
Its is a possessive pronoun meaning, more or less, of it or belonging to it.
And there is absolutely, positively, no such word as its'.
A wonderful day to all.
PK

More corrections from G****108! She is the one that should get a new hobby or a new nursing home!

You are the one who has nothing better to do than post on this site, all day every day. LOL. You are green with envy and you display it with every post. LMAO

Everyone is jealous with envy of Miss Knowitall historian. The little old lady who knows everything about Natalie and hates RJ. Very shortly that will all change when the true historian makes his entrance and everyone will bow only to him. September winds are coming with something new for everyone!Get ready to be amazed!

"Get ready to be amazed!"
lolololol I can't stop laughing!
Is this *****for real?

She is too dumb to realize that she is making a fool out of herself and taking Vlad and RJ along for the ride.

She sure loves September. That is all she ever talks about. The wind in September. The change in September. All will be revealed in September.
Poor thing.

and aside from Goodbye Natalie Goodbye Splendour we will see nothing in September.

We will see the book banished. That is what we will see and Vlad has the clout to have it done.

Vlad has the clout? ROFL I laughed so hard I just pissed myself.

In the Twilight Zone fanofvlad calls home, that may be possible but in the real world that will not happen.

banished? Where are we in 16 century England? Does anything get banished anymore? WTF?

Banished? Shades of Farenheit 451. Burn those books! Ridiculous!

She is the one making a fool out of herself. People are finding out you don't know everything about Natalie. They will find out all the truth in September when the real Natalie historian takes over and wears the crown.
Sarah Palin wannabe!

LMAO Sarah Palin wannabe?
"takes over and wears the crown" LOL Wacko!