|
Natpak alive?September 21 2009 at 6:47 PM No score for this post | Natpaker (no login) |
| What happened to Natpak? They banished Tru and died. Some Natalie fans they are. I believe in the new book, so I'm afraid to post there. Notice CHK hasn't even said his feelings on the book? Is he that slow of a reader? Is he afraid he'll be attacked by his own members? Or is he going to wimp out on Natalie, too? |
|
| Author | Reply |
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Natpak alive?No score for this post | September 21 2009, 6:50 PM |
They're all checking in here, that's where they are. They're trying to stop the unstoppable. They vulger this site to see what they have to try to stop. But the dam has split, and the damned will be damned. Thank you, GNGS. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Natpak alive?No score for this post | September 21 2009, 8:14 PM |
The natpack is being silent like most of the Natalie sites because of *sshole traders like you ***** ****. They have alot to say about the fictional GNGS they just don't want you to know about it because you are a troll on their sites.
This message has been edited by spindaddydad on Sep 21, 2009 9:27 PM
|
|
|
Ascots and muscle tees at 50 (no login) | Re: Natpak alive?No score for this post | September 21 2009, 10:04 PM |
THey are not silent. Especially with a disgusting foul mouthed pigs like you! One of their biggest champions.
Great bunch of swine the Rj mongrels are!
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOOLOLOL |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Natpak alive?No score for this post | September 22 2009, 4:40 AM |
They have alot to say about the fictional GNGS they just don't want you to know about it because you are a troll on their sites.
So what you are saying is one of the OPs here is right. The group stays silent while a few send private emails back and forth to each other condemning people they don't know and condemning GNGS? No matter how hard they protest and say it isn't true, the truth always wins in the end.
Thank you, whoever you are for that bit of information. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: Natpak alive?No score for this post | September 22 2009, 7:37 PM |
Talk about paranoid. How would you know about "private" emails and their contents? LOL |
|
A former member of RJ Group (no login) | NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 21 2009, 8:24 PM |
Most of the Natpack nitwits are RJ group members. Chuck is afraid of them so he either remains silent or he agrees with them. They have gone beyond their love for RJ. They will stop at nothing to try and destroy Marti Rulli. These same people go on the book ordering sites and leave scathing reviews.
The RJ group sent them all over to Natpack to trash Chuck's site. They say they have not but that is a lie. Natpack is full of RJ members. Just check the archives. A Natalie Festival, her Anniversary, her birthday, a tv showing of her movies etc. NOTHING! One or two people post including Chuck. Everyone else remains silent. No one cares.
Say something negative about Mr. Sleaze Ball of Hollywood and they come out of their RAT HOLES and infest the site and Chuck lets them get away with it.
I always liked RJ. I never thought he was capable of hurting anyone but the louder these people screamed and protested the more my eyes opened and after reading Rulli's book I LOATHE THE MAN!
Now don't come back with a dumb response that I'm that woman that gets stalked on here by an RJ nut because I am not. Be;eve me there are more than a handful of people that dislike Robert Wagner.
|
|
HART 2 HART 4 EVER (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 21 2009, 10:16 PM |
Dang! Big mouth Heidi posted something other than her usual rants about GNGS and Rulli and Davern on Natpack. Shocking! She actually posted about a Natalie Wood movie that is coming on tv.
I;m not a hater but even I was getting tired of the rantings of her and Pam and a few others. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 22 2009, 9:46 PM |
H**d**'s post is all for show. She could care less that Natalie drowned a horrible death at the hands of someone who obviously wanted her dead. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 24 2009, 12:32 PM |
Last count there were 411 members on Natpak but a handful from the RJ Shrine are on there screaming and fussing and getting their knickers in a twist. Then Chuck has the nerve to throw somebody off for speaking their mind?
411 members and they all love RJ? Don't think so. Here is one who can't stand the fake old geezer. I joined a Natalie group not an RJ group but it is more like and RJ group than anything else because of those old hens from the RJ group.
Chuck sure is hen pecked. |
|
Hart 2 Hart 4 Ever (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 24 2009, 2:23 PM |
i see I'm not the only one who is fed up with Natpack. I'm sure when they read this they will report back to Chuck and he will take their side and probably post something about if we don't like it we can leave. Sad really, because I have no problem with RJ but that group is totally out of hand. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 24 2009, 2:30 PM |
Did wimp C**** ever give his opinion of the new book? LOL...he can't. Doomed if he liked it and doomed if he didn't. It's a Natalie group, afterall...isn't it? LOL |
|
A Natpack member (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 24 2009, 4:51 PM |
I am a member of Natpack but I am not a member of any RJ group. I never cared for him and always found him very superficially handsome but I don't hate him or anything lie that. I do agree that Natpack really got crazy with people I never saw post before and I did hear they were from an RJ group. You really should not blame an entire group for a handful of people who were arguing just to argue. Anyone that had anything good to say about this new book was spoken to like they were dirt and the moderator certainly did take sides but all in all there are some really nice people on that group but they like me are afraid to voice an opinion because of the RJ fans and the moderator. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 24 2009, 4:58 PM |
Well, I like the new book, and I am a member of the group but I haven't posted since the new book was mentioned. I don't need that kind of abuse. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 24 2009, 5:36 PM |
instead you come here and get your knickers in a twist. chuck shouldnt have to cater to you. leave if you dont like it and start your own group. buh bye!! |
|
A Natpack member (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 24 2009, 6:53 PM |
My "knickers" aren't "in a twist". I was just stating a fact but here we go with the craziness again. You don't know me and I assure you this is all very trivial. I was just posting an observation.
So buh bye back to you ya'll! |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 24 2009, 8:17 PM |
and you dont know me either, but that doesnt stop you from commenting on me and my fellow natpack members.
leave if youre not happy there. i promise you that you wont be missed.
|
|
A Natpack Menber (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 24 2009, 8:25 PM |
Now why would I leave? It would make you happy to know you drove off people and I would never want to make you happy. I will stay and report back to this and other sites so people will see how a small group of rabble rousers can destroy a decent group especially when the moderator is afraid of his own shadow. How nice that they are sporadically discussing a few Natalie films that will be on TV. It is just a matter of time before the big mouths start screaming again about this book and it turns back into the RJ shrine. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 25 2009, 10:08 AM |
Don't leave. If you do then we won't find out how H**** and P** and C**** the wimp boy are doing and we need great spies like you. They can'r all come from RJ's bunch of looney broads. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 25 2009, 10:59 AM |
I wont leave the Natters who are really RJer's either. I like watching the RJ fans do their number on Chukky. What a wimp. He won't even comment on the new book. LOL. Grow a spine. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 25 2009, 1:08 PM |
Chuck will comment and everyone will listen to him. He knows that RJ would never hurt a soul and he loves RJ. All the real Natpack members like Heidi and Pam will stand by him.
Chuck isn't afraid of anyone including the Natalie lovers. Chuck's heart belongs to RJ like any true RJ fan should. |
|
Vlad has gone amuck (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 25 2009, 1:39 PM |
Right! Just like poor old Vlad is on IMDB trying to get someone, anyone to respond to his self serving asinine LOL posts.
Chuck is another one without a backbone or a thought of his own just like Vlad and those other morons who drool over the MURDEROUS COWARD of CATALINA! |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 25 2009, 2:15 PM |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 25 2009, 9:23 PM |
Check this out! One of my friends just told me that Fran was on another group trying to say she never comes on here and how awful it is and she is making a reference to a certain person that she is obsessed with. She really thinks everyone is dumb. She is so obsessed with her that she couldn't just post her crap without mentioning her. DEAD GIVE A WAY dumb bell!
We are members of Natpack and no one likes Fran because of Vlad and the trouble she caused.
My friend wouldn't tell me the group but it is so easy to figure out.
Dumb idiot thinks every single post is from the woman she stalks and is obsessed with.
|
|
Vladismyidol (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 26 2009, 8:59 PM |
Vlad is not on any group but his own which is mentored by his wife the true Natalie and RJ historian, Cher.
Vlad does not correspond with this rjw person because they do not get along. Vlad know everything about his angel and rjw does not. That is why they do not get along.
I am the only spokeperson for Vlad because he is so busy with his blogs and fans and his career he does not have time to answer all his mail.
He refuses to speak of the new book because he is above that and he is not at liberty to speak about it. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 26 2009, 9:14 PM |
May I ask a question, who cares? |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: NATPACK is all RJ GROUP MEMBERSNo score for this post | September 27 2009, 7:14 AM |
Obviously Vlad cares and so does his 10 members because they keep posting their dumb vlad is my idol bs. People need to do what the imdb people do. Just post around him and his wife who I heard is the one that posts the idol vlad trash anyway. Two peas from the same pod. | |
|
| Current Topic - Natpak alive? |
|
|