<< Previous Topic | Next Topic >>View more postings  

Reality Check

September 29 2009 at 11:32 AM
No score for this post
Troy  (no login)

Do you people really think the Wagners give a crap about this book? Do you people realize the level the Wagners live on, its called celebrity. RJ and Jill are eating surf and turf and the Wagner girls are going to LA clubs. The impact of this book to the Wagners is compaired to their $60.00 steak not being cooked to the right rareness. Reality check people, no one cares. Do something good for someone instead of getting caught up in all this fodder, think about it, where is it going to get you in the long run.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Somewhere on North Beverly Drive
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 12:21 PM 

The level the Wagner's live on, the Wagner girls at L A clubs?
Robert Wagner, Jill St. John and their collective daughters and step daughters and family live no better than any other successful family. Nothing more, nothing less. They have bills to pay as the rest of us do and each needs to work as the rest of us do. Very few are the Candy Spelling's of the world.
My goodness! RJ and Jill are not the crowned heads of Europe nor are their daughters on the annual Forbes heiress list.
Ask around the film colony about the feelings of the Wagner family toward this book. They are not handling this matter as one would handle something so trivial as a 60.00 steak not done to their liking.
I can also assure you that more than fans or the morbidly curious read and at times post on these sites.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 4:07 PM 

Robert Wagner probably thinks this book is as insignificant as his fans do. His fans are here and on the TheNatPack day and night talking about the book. They don't seem to be able to stop discussing it. Yes, I imagine RJ is as casual about it as they are.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Two Stop signs from Elevado Avenue
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 5:44 PM 

You may believe it or not but this book is not being shrugged off by the keeper's of the old guard in Hollywood and by many of the new crop too.
It is quite relevant out here.
Please note I have not given my opinion of the book or its findings. I am merely stating a fact.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 6:48 PM 

Why? The cops obviously don't care, why should Wagner?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 7:30 PM 

IMO, I think Wagner has given several "craps" over this book.
(How can I not LOL on this one?)

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Intersection of Park Way & North Canon Drive
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 8:27 PM 

It matters to Robert Wagner because it is how he is perceived in the public eye. He is no different that any other celebrity. He is of a time and generation when public perception meant a great deal.
Robert Wagner may dismiss this book and its many bombshells in public but he is not ignoring it in private.
I must say, it certainly has livened up many a dreary cocktail party in the 902__ zips and let me not forget quite a few boring lunches on the Polo Lounge's outdoor patio have had an adrenaline rush when the title of the book has been mentioned.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 8:32 PM 

Many bombshells?? Puleeeze!!

Oh my, and aren't your "street" screen names clever! How long did it take you to think them up? Or did you just cheat and use mapquest?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Is this aquapod?

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 8:41 PM 

Is this AQUAPOD? lololololololololololol

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Is this aquapod?

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 8:56 PM 

That is RJW who is Fran on the RJ list and Aquapod on Natpak. She was also Mimi and Taddletale and about 50 more screen names. Pay her no mind. A newborn has more sense than that dummy.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Just North of Wilshire Blvd.
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 8:47 PM 

I see that you think I am making negative statements against Robert Wagner. I am not. I am stating facts.
Simple. I have not one make a statement about the book or Robert Wagner that can not be justified. As for my street creed. What can I say? I can't use Dog Patch and Cannery Row addresses because I am not familiar with them. What I can use is areas I am familiar with. Say whatever you want. You will anyway. I can see that all too clearly but the facts still remain the facts in my previous posts.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 8:52 PM 

Aquapod is rambling on the Natpack group. That is who is so nasty to you on here. Everybody knows who she really is. She forgets other posts when she used other names and she repeats herself.
Post around her. I'm interested to hear more and you are right. You have not given your opinion of RJ or this book but if these RJ group morons even think you might say something bad about their stupid old drunk they go wild.
Ignore it and her. She is a freak of nature anyway.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 8:59 PM 

Puleeeze!!

That sure sounds familiar. Gotcha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 9:35 PM 

Fran AND Heidi are here. (I can tell in the posts), They've been here and they are here because this book's credibility AND believabilty is eating them alive. There isn't enough action at their little small-minded places (how many times can one say "great video" and "great smile in that pic" in a day?) so they come here because they know this book is justified and it eats them alive.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 29 2009, 9:57 PM 

big deal

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 3:44 AM 

I guess it is a big deal or you wouldn't be reading and posting your squalid little posts.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Screaming Mimi
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 4:36 AM 

I miss being a part of the RJ group too. I loved all their screen captures, video clips and all the little drawings of RJ!
It made me feel as though I was back in public school with the rest of the little 10 year old prats!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 7:52 AM 

Hey guys, on the threads, keep your names shorter (although I love the street names) because long names creater narrow text boxes. Check it out.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
8221 Sunset Blvd.
(no login)

Better?

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 10:12 AM 

Is this better? Of course I will be accused of using Mapquest but I don't think it lists bungalow numbers.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
September 30 2009, 10:17 AM 

Your are funny (and clever) Streetperson.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Live from Benedict Canyon
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 1:05 PM 

I have it on the best authority that the street person has never used Mapquest in their life. Their chauffeur uses state of the art GPS.
Now be gone!
LOL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 3:33 PM 

Why? Is the chauffeur too stupid to read a good old fashioned map??

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Left on Helena in Brentwood
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 6:56 PM 

Why? Is the chauffeur too stupid to read a good old fashioned map??
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh my dear, just because you are still locked into the era of the Reagans and Kissinger it does not mean that everyone is. For your personal information, both Mr. and Mrs. Wagner use GPR's not only on their personal vehicles but also when a car is hired for them it is equipped standard with GPR tracking.
I'm so very sorry that you still drive around in your clunker stopping any derelict on a street corner for directions but some of us do prefer to live in the 21st century.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
gp(R) directons to *greenacres
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 7:07 PM 

I've been stating GPR for post upon post and the dumb dodo bird still hasn't figured it out but she talks about good old fashioned maps and stupid chauffeurs.


*No not that Greenacres, Mr. Haney!

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 7:09 PM 

Green Acres is the place to be. Farm living is the life for me.
What other Green Acres is there idiot?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 7:13 PM 

It is an old tv show from the 1960s with Eddie Albert who was a best friend of ledgend RJ Wagner.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 7:29 PM 


"ledgend"? Now there is a word you don't hear everyday. CSL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
North of Hollywood Blvd on Franklin Ave
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 8:00 PM 

A> The reference to Greenacres is the Harold Loyd Estate in Benedict Canyon.
B> GPR is used for steering
C> GPS is a navigation system
D> le(D)gend? Robert Wagner is part of the urban dictionary? Yes! There really is a word ledgent but it hardly fits Mr. Wagner.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 7:59 PM 

Nice try to save face, Street Lady, but actually you only just typed GPR in one post, your most recent. You did correctly say GPS before, so there was no error to notice. And even if there were, I'm way about pointing out typos. Everyone is human.

Regardless, good luck if the GPS satellite is out and you can't find your way around. Maps, on the other hand, will always be operational. Too bad you won't be able to use one.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Straight through to Cresent Heights
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 8:31 PM 

LOL and I'm still keeping you on the hook and posting, aren't I? Getting you to flip through the posts like the little secretary that you are. How sweet! Toying with the little people is such fun.
I must take umbrage about the street lady remark though. With this beard and size 12 feet no lady should look like me and if one does she needs to stay behind closed doors or at the very least in the maid's quarters.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 8:33 PM 

Street person? Who the hell are you? You talk in circles.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 8:34 PM 

I'm the pool boy at the Chateau Marmont.
LOL

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 8:35 PM 

Nice try but really who the hell are you?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 8:36 PM 

I'm a server at the Polo Lounge.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
azure blue ice
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 8:41 PM 

OK, I give up...Here is the only real hint you are getting...
Pebbly Beach Road and that one is for real.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 1 2009, 8:49 PM 

Pebbly Beach Road is on Catalina Island. That still does not tell me who you are but I think I know.
Do you own a business that has something to do with restaurants on both coasts?

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Sherman Oaks out at Ventura Canyon
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 2 2009, 8:23 AM 

LOL, maybe, maybe not but I still have the foolish underlings posting I see.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 2 2009, 11:03 PM 

You trolls give a crap.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Opening soon in Pascagoula too!
(no login)

Re: Better?

No score for this post
October 3 2009, 6:43 AM 

You must or you wouldn't be posting little, little person.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
RJ4EVER
(no login)

the other Natalie groups are done for now!

No score for this post
October 4 2009, 7:50 AM 

I heard some of the Rj group has finally infiltrated the other Natalie Wood groups and I'm not referring to Natpak. Maybe they will take over all groups so RJ can live in peace.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Anonymous
(no login)

Re: Reality Check

No score for this post
October 17 2009, 11:22 AM 

The level the Wagner's live on? You act like those lunatics on the RJ group who say Robert Wagner is a billionaire with swarms of body guards and women fainting over him.
You are talking like Robert Wagner is the Sultan of Brunei and like the daughters are royalty heiresses.
They all put one foot in front of the other and go to work every day. Why do you think Robert Wagner and Jill St. John are doing duty as MC's at Magic Shows? For their health?
Come on now. Rub the fairy dust out of your eyes.

 
Scoring disabled. You must be logged in to score posts.Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Reality Check
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>View more postings  
Your Ad Here