|
Marti Rulli Challenges the Authorities.May 19 2010 at 3:22 AM No score for this post | Creed (Login CreedsWord) |
| Reposted with consent
I accuse the authorities in the Natalie Wood case of performing a horrid job in getting to the truth about the circumstances surrounding this unimaginable death.
Goodbye Natalie Goodbye Splendour is an accurate, polygraphed account of the true details surrounding Natalie's death and the book speaks for itself. Whatever it insinuates is DERIVED from FACTS.
Dennis Davern and I invite any polygraphist, any authority, any media to challenge our FACTUAL BOOK. We will cooperate with any questioning, and requests.
http://martirulli.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Author | Reply |
Gina (Login GeorginaN) | Re: Marti Rulli Challenges the Authorities.No score for this post | May 19 2010, 11:16 AM |
I saw this at Rulli's blog, but hate seeing it here for these imbeciles to rip into like a bunch of rabid werewolves. I just left a post on another thread that said I respected her dignity, but if she's going to allow things to be posted here, well, I don't go for that. Rulli should stick to her blog which is perfectly designed to deflect these idiots. (sorry, Rulli, just my honest opinion. Stick to your blog. It's effective.) |
|
Gina (Login GeorginaN) | Re: Marti Rulli Challenges the Authorities.No score for this post | May 19 2010, 11:21 AM |
On second thought, for anyone new coming here, this is a good GPS. It will take the person to the only decent discussion of facts. |
|
Creed (Login CreedsWord) | Re: Marti Rulli Challenges the Authorities.No score for this post | May 19 2010, 11:51 AM |
Gina, I agree. This place is the very lowest rung and it does tend to cater to the more baser element but as you said, it also serves to direct folks to the blog that Rulli has set-up.
I don't enjoy posting things here but it does serve a limited function. |
|
gonefishin (Login diaryofafisherman) | you might not post but you are here everyday SIMONE!No score for this post | May 19 2010, 12:24 PM |
Re: Marti Rulli Challenges Authorities, Media
by bell-simone 13 minutes ago (Wed May 19 2010 10:02:28)
I see one of the Head Trolls from the "death board" has come calling. Creed, or Unforgiven, or TruthNeverSleeps, whatever your name is, return to Your Leader and inform her that no one is buying her and Davern's story.
MR is desperate, bottom line. Whatever scant interest was first shown regarding the book, has now waned with the realization that her "proof" consists of a person who has already perjured himself and admits HE DIDN'T SEE A THING.
She is still trying to drum up controversy but the parade has not only passed her by, she's the only one left standing on the sidewalk.
AND THIS COMES FROM THE NEW MEMBER OF THE RJ LIST.
GOOD JOB SIMONE! MAKE THEM ALL PROUD! You dont post here but you sure as hell read every post here and you call others trolls and then run back and report it so you and fat azz from the UK and those other wrinklies can discuss it on the RJ LIST.
ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
|
|
gonefishin (Login diaryofafisherman) | Hey Simone! Look familiar?No score for this post | May 19 2010, 12:33 PM |
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 01:48:12 +0000
Subject: [RJ] Re: horrible homecoming........
Davern isn't credible. The only person who believes his version of events is Marti Rulli, and I'm not sure she believes it - she may have pretended to believe it, in order to get the book published.
|
|
somer43783 (Login somer43783) | Re: Hey Simone! Look familiar?No score for this post | May 19 2010, 12:57 PM |
Ah yes, and she certainly keeps company on imdb with a most credible member and at the most opportune timings.
Now, now children! No need for tantrums! The aforementioned statement was said facetiously. |
|
gonefishing (Login diaryofafisherman) | Re: Hey Simone! Look familiar?No score for this post | May 19 2010, 1:00 PM |
Oh Wow! hey somer! You dont know how bad Im chewing my tongue right now cuz I want to answer that but I cant for private reasons but I sure am thinking it |
|
Lola (Login Lola6) | Re: you might not post but you are here everyday SIMONE!No score for this post | May 19 2010, 1:04 PM |
I saw that, gonefishin. Simone is in this with Vlad on IMDB. Dealing with Vlad, she will discredit herself. Vlad claims not to have a membership here. We know that's bull. Vlad is here using a different name. All that red head crap belongs to Vlad, that LOL crap belongs that that numb-skull who used the name "prince", among other names, on this forum. The same idiot used the "gag order" term in the past. Jocko used the LOL thing on Amazon and he also used some of the inane terminology that Vlad has used in the past. It seems that they may be the same person. There was that incident with the petition in which Vlad attempted to sign, claimed that he was from Belgium but his IP said differently. As Vlad and his alternate personalities have said the past, IPs don't lie. How can anyone take Vlad-Prince-Jocko seriously? How proud the Wagner crew must be to have this person in their corner. I believe that he is telling one truth, that is, Vlad is Jocko or Jocko is vlad or PucciPrince is Jocko or Vlad is PucciPrince. One person is posting, using these names and many others. Perhaps the Wagner crew should invoke a gag order for this fool.
I wonder where Vlad was truly posting from on that petition. It was not Belgium or Romania. James has too much class to violate Vlad's privacy by telling us where he posted from. Why did Vlad lie? There was no need to post an address. Why would he say that he was posting from Belgium? Why not say that he was posting from Romania, he claims that Romania is his home but he claimed that he was from Belgium. Only James knows the true location of all of those who sign because as Vlad and Jocko and PrincePucci have said, IPs don't lie.
Ignore this sicko troll. Ignore the posts by the sunnflower impersonators. If you see any of the names that have been listed, ignore them. If you recognize the tone of the posts as being that of any of this cast of characters, ignore it. A person who is this consumed with GNGS is not a stable person. To sink to the level that this person has gone to tells me that this person is not a stable individual. This person is dangerous.
|
|
somer43783 (Login somer43783) | Re: you might not post but you are here everyday SIMONE!No score for this post | May 19 2010, 1:15 PM |
Lola,
I am aware that your post is directed to the gonefishing person but I could tell you exactly where that IP was signed from if ethics were not involved. My ethics, not the ethics of the person who signed the petition.
Simply addressed, I am quite familiar with on line petitions, polls and groups and that is all I ethically will say about it.
I can tell you this, you and others are correct with the statement, "ips don't lie."
|
|
Lola (Login Lola6) | Re: you might not post but you are here everyday SIMONE!No score for this post | May 19 2010, 1:23 PM |
I understand where you are coming from. The person who signed the petition has no ethics but James does. We will respect that. |
|
daisy (Login daisyclover) | Re: you might not post but you are here everyday SIMONE!No score for this post | May 19 2010, 1:32 PM |
Simone couldn't be more wrong about Rulli. Rulli is NOT alone in all of this. What kind of fools are they? They laugh at there only being 400 signatures on the petition, but that's 400 people to their handful of fools. Goodbye Natalie book has 5 times the amount of positive reviews than those fool reviews.
There are tens of thousands of people who know that we never learned the truth about Natalie's death until this book and it ALL rigns TRUE! All of these people will know soon because I believe Rulli will come on through with getting this case reopened. This just can't go ignored. Their are people in justice who DO care about justice! They will eventually provide justice because if they don't, this case will go down in history as the epitome of the law's neglect. They won't have that.
The fools don't understand that Rulli is not left standing alone on a sidewalk (what a weird analogy!) Rulli has so many people behind her and just because it isn't at this crazy place, we exist! I am one of thousands.
Jocko/aka 10 other names is insane, and so are his little troopers, Simone the biggest fool of all. Her blog is pathetic.
Yes, visit the only blog with logic: Marti Rulli's.
|
|
TruthForNatalie (Login iwanttruthfornatalie) | not a good ideaNo score for this post | May 19 2010, 1:46 PM |
i do not think it a very good idea for marty rullie to say nat was murdered. it is tru dennis is not the proof. he said he never saw a murder. rullie can not prove there was 1. cops must not beleive her as nothing has been done. maybe it is tru she did it for money. money talks sh** walks |
|
Lola (Login Lola6) | Re: not a good ideaNo score for this post | May 19 2010, 2:14 PM |
The above poster is an example what I was referring to. Ignore it. |
|
Lola (Login Lola6) | Re: you might not post but you are here everyday SIMONE!No score for this post | May 19 2010, 2:25 PM |
Daisy these clowns make me laugh. They dismiss GNGS yet they can't stop talking about it, they dismiss Marti Rulli yet they hang on her every word. |
|
Move Along Doggies, Scumbags & RJ-Fantards (Login MustangXX) | Simone is Everywhere Everyday!No score for this post | May 19 2010, 10:00 PM |
And always has been, before she started using her true name Simone (if she really is a she and if that really is her name)!
I just finished reading GNGS. Although I accidentally came into this hornet's nest, still believing in my dreamworld memories of having first met them all, the book changed my perspective of what actually went on that night, that a absolutely horrendous investigation completely missed. I was just around 100yds away from Splendor that night. The seas were flat as glass, absolutely no doubt about that. If Natalie had drown the night before, she no doubt would have been pounded into an unrecognizable pulp against the rocks in that cove. But her body never hit the rocks, because the seas were that flat.
So there were no dingies or launches banging up against the side of any yachts on that Saturday night. Majority of yachts only load from Starboard Gangways or stern swimsteps if they are fishing boats. So their launch could have only been tied to stern or Starboard (as RJ claimed "Well the launch is normally tied to starboard = copout). If tied to Starboard on a fishboat, you most commonly tie off fore and aft to an outrigger to keep the launch from banging against the hull in rough seas held off the side. In calm seas like that night you would most likely tie off to stern for convenience in boarding it for trips back and forth to Two Harbors Ferry Dock. Which is not more than 100yds from where they were moored as a bird flys.
Especially not Splendor's Port side where the headboard of Natalie's Master Stateroom Bed is up against (built in). I've been through Splendor's Master Stateroom myself. Because there is no walk around deck to bypass it. You are forced to either go through it or up to the bridge and down into the salon. Any fool can see that as impractical, going up and down ladders to get through the boat. The music playing that night was loud and could only be coming from a point that was in the open on any boat. We could not tell the direction, only that it was annoying at that time of night to hear someone playing music, when that what you came to Two Harbors, Catalina in the first place.
The book reveals new information that was backed up by RJ himself. Such as the fight and subsequent breaking of the bottle of wine. It also details the fact that Dennis had to take Natalie into shore the night before to stay in a Hotel. The detectives were unaware of these key points that would have for certain had a further investigation taking place alone. But why did RJ not dispute the claims in the media, that Natalie had gone out to retie the launch in glass like conditions and fell in? He knew better. He also knew Natalie would never attempt to take the launch on her own to go party drunk and dressed in pajamas, socks and only a jacket. Why did he allow the media to spread this mis-information as the cause for his wife's death, even years after?
A re-investigation is the only thing that can bring out the truth of what actually happened that night and just how badly the first one was so badly handled. Not entirely because the detectives made bad decisions as the fact that all the key witnesses except Marilyn, were holding back the full truth of the circumstances of that night. That would of course include Chris, Dennis and Robert Wagner. Chris was aware of the fight, the detectives would have loved to have heard about.... why did he keep his mouth shut? Dennis was aware of the fight and chose to keep quiet. Whether out of fear of either concerns for RJ or fear of him. Not only that he undoubtedly had his own self interest concerns with having been drunk as the captain of yacht responsible for the safety of his guests!
Right or wrong that night, information crucial to Natalie's Death was withheld from the detectives. That could have most likely turned the investigation from merely being an unfortunate accident, into being a possible criminal case. There were many careers at stake that night. Christopher Walken's dead silence speaks volumes. The story changes from both Dennis and Robert Wagner tell us they knew their career's were in jeopardy. No contest on the Coroner, who failed to fully disclose the facts himself, though he most likely knew them.
What Marti Ruli has endeavored to do with this book, is get many unanswered questions answered about that night. The book does an excellent job of exposing the inconsistencies and anyone denying this is in denial themselves. We can only hope that this case is reopened. Not just for the sake of finding out more of what happened, but to either clear of convict the people responsible for Natalie Woods death. If I was RJ and I was innocent or a fan and thought he was, then I'd be looking at this as a chance to once and for all clear myself of any suspicions or that my you as fans that believe him, can all rest in peace that nothing criminal went on that night! .....so for Simone and the rest of you, why are you fighting against this case simply being re-opened as if your life's depend on it!!! |
|
somer43783 (Login somer43783) | Re: Simone is Everywhere Everyday!No score for this post | May 20 2010, 7:03 AM |
A numerical anagram:
40404 |
|
somer43783 (Login somer43783) | Re: Simone is Everywhere Everyday!No score for this post | May 20 2010, 9:11 AM |
I agree with you mustang. How strange is it that this Simone person has stopped posting on here under her Simone screen name but she certainly has no problem blowing up the imdb Natalie Wood board with her supposed new found friend.
Strange that her friend stated very clearly on the RJ group that he thought sending a pm was going behind someone's back and he would never do that but about a year and a half later he has changed his tune and now it is "Simone, check your pm's."
I am sure Rulli and Davern won't get any applause from that particular crowd but from what I have read, both are willing to speak to authorities and Davern especially is willing to take whatever is handed out to him from the authorities concerning his part. Can they say the same for Robert Wagner?
I agree with you once again. If anyone, however remotely accused me of harming a loved one I wouldn't care who they were, who I was or who might get hurt in the wake I would come forward and demand a full investigation be opened. Silence can certainly speak volumes and Robert Wagner's silence just keeps adding more pages to that tableau. |
|
TruthForNatalie (Login iwanttruthfornatalie) | sea was not smooth as glass it was roughNo score for this post | May 20 2010, 9:19 AM |
false statement mustang. i donot beleive any of things you say. who r u really???????????????????
seas were very very rough that night. i read the official report and that is what it says and i beleive that over a dude on a looser board with a lot of names. |
|
ASHLEY (Login ashleygabriellahunsacker) | Re: sea was not smooth as glass it was roughNo score for this post | May 20 2010, 12:34 PM |
Simone
by - vladislaus on Thu May 20 2010 10:26:04
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check your PMs
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL |
|
somer43783 (Login somer43783) | Re: sea was not smooth as glass it was roughNo score for this post | May 20 2010, 3:42 PM |
I saw that "Simone check your PM's" rot on imdb too but of course it is gone now. More behind the scenes possum playing no doubt. |
|
Lola (Login Lola6) | Re: sea was not smooth as glass it was roughNo score for this post | May 20 2010, 12:41 PM |
Nor do any of us believe anything you say Mr Truth. Official report. There were a few "official reports". Tell us, word for word what this, um, official report said.
The seas were very, very rough, you say? All the more reason for quick action by the devoted husband. If the seas were as rough as this report states then Wagner should have been in a panic with worry the possibility that his wife was out there alone in the dark, rough waters. In the Lambert biography he said that he was not immediately worried and his actions verify that statement. It took him 4 hours to become worried enough to consent to a Coast Guard search, 2 hours to do a general radio call. In between he claims to have sat and drank. What odd behavior considering his wife, who was petrified of deep, dark water and was unable to swim , was out there amid the very, very rough seas.
|
|
somer43783 (Login somer43783) | Re: sea was not smooth as glass it was roughNo score for this post | May 20 2010, 1:56 PM |
All that cretin does is dispute with either a bold faced lie or a statement that can be stripped apart within seconds as you have done. If the sea was as rough as claimed the only logical thing to do would be to assume my wife was out in the dinghy, partying on another boat. I'll just sit here and drink my face off until she comes back. No need for worry.
To this day the hollow words "You have to believe me. It was an accident" ring in my head every time I think of Natalie Wood. |
|
gonefishin (Login diaryofafisherman) | the old group?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!No score for this post | May 20 2010, 3:01 PM |
Hey whats this about the old group?
Sandy calls us all trolls now but when her and her buddy JockoRVendetti were posting non stop on here that was different.Now Im at my RJ LIST and I see Sandys post about a old group. Is there a new group and why wasnt I invited to it? I checked Yahoo all day but cant find it! Im so sad. I thought I was one of the favorites. Come on now Mrs Moderators I only carry a few storys and only troll once in awhile. Whats wrong with that? Other members troll 24/7 and you love them! If I find out that there really is a new group and Sandy and Jerko and Vlad and Simone are members and I aint I will have a tantrum and cry into my beer every night!
So I guess we are getting the blame of impersonating them too? Fraid not. That comes from your resident two face troll. |
|
Gina (Login GeorginaN) | Re: the old group?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!No score for this post | May 20 2010, 4:01 PM |
The seas were rough Friday night in Avalon, not Saturday night at the Two Harbors. Dr. Taylor in Goodbye Natalie, who was moored near Splendour says the same thing as Mustang. The seas were smooth as glass. Marilyn Wayne says the same thing. Davern says the same thing. The HARBORMASTER says the same thing, that the sea was smooth. Only the RJ fans know better....they were there in their dreams, I guess.
Mustang, you've done this place proud. You recognize the inconsistencies in this case and you realize that all Rulli and Davern were trying to do with their book was to bring these facts to the attention of everyone. I like that you know about dinghy tie-ups too on boats. I totally understood it from the book. There's no way that dinghy was banging and no way it was tied near Natalie's stateroom, where there isn't a swimstep to even go on to secure it. The banging dinghy theory itself is the stupidest thing ever propogated. That investigation is the biggest joke of all the investigations in California's history.
Of course the RJ fans think their fantasies can change the truth, but it can't. The truth is here and the hideous investigation is exposed. |
|
daisy (Login daisyclover) | To MustangNo score for this post | May 20 2010, 8:05 PM |
Mustangxxx
You should put everything you said here about being there and what you know and how you feel about this book at Amazon. Write a review because you were actually there and you know the boat and can verify these two authors know what they are talking about.
Mrs. Sheldon has said that Hollywooders know this book is accurate. She has held her tongue for Nat's daughters, but she made it clear what a liar Wagner is.
Sunnflower is all over Amazon claiming that Rulli has no right to be calling Wagner and Walken liars. She has every right in the book (no pun) to do so! Creed and a few others put the fool in her place! |
|
Lola (Login Lola6) | Re: To MustangNo score for this post | May 20 2010, 8:27 PM |
They are liars. They both lied to the police and in interviews. Why is that so difficult to comprehend? It's called denial. These people obviously know very little about what they are talking about or they don't want to see it. Wagner's book is loaded with lies but some of his newer fans do not know enough about him to recognize the lies. His long time fans are in huge denial. He has made fools out of them. |
|
gonefishing (Login diaryofafisherman) | Re: To MustangNo score for this post | May 20 2010, 9:00 PM |
Sunflower sandy lynn and her good buddy jerkorvendetti are 2 of the biggest trolls on the internet but hartbeat will always come to the heifers defense because she tells the RJ LIST what they want to hear and trashes anyone that doesnt agree with her and fall all over the hypocrite.
When you read this sandy make sure you run and post it so our newest member Vampira Simone can jump on it and agree and then the other wrinklie hags can beat their drums to and then Simone can give the info to the IMDB troll in a pm. ROFL
When you call people trolls try looking in your mirror first HAGS! |
|
Mustang Mustang Mustang Mustang Enough? (Login MustangXX) | Rough Waters? lol.... You're hilarious!No score for this post | May 21 2010, 6:14 AM |
If it was rough Natalie's body didn't show it.... because if it was rough, she would have been beat and ripped to shreds against the rocks.... GUARANTEED! Instead, without any swell, there's nothing to propel her body against those rocks. She then just ebbed and flowed within the cove..., without being washed up against ROCKS in that cove. The boat too... would have been punctured and deflated. A low lying mist/fog (a couple of feet thick) moved in later in the night and that was most likely why the Coast Guard didn't attempt. You're never see any wind and rain, in those conditions. Only in dead calm seas, do you a mist or low fog move in under high pressure ridge as a storm leaves!
Now... why didn't you ask me how I know about where the headboard is in the Master Stateroom on Splendor. Just ask Robert Wagner, Marti or Dennis where the head board was? They are going to tell you "Port Side"! haha.... :D ...Catalina? ...been there more times than I could count... by boat and air. I know it like the back of my hand!
It was rough on Thursday, out side of Avalon harbor itself and if you were traveling across the channel from the mainland, better have your Dramamine. That's why, we on Yacht ******** left Avalon the next day. Because of the 3 foot rollers in the inner harbor on Friday morning. Which made life miserable, just sitting on a mooring bobbing like a cork!
We like many others, left Avalon to head up the coast of Catalina to the Isthmus to escape those conditions. Storms in November usually come up from the South. When they do, the direction of the swells changes (like with hurricanes and typhoons) as it gets closer to land in Mexico. Then when they hit land mass it can cause the storm to break up very fast. In Avalon on Thanksgiving Day, there were no swells in the inner harbor, just lots of rain. Because you are in the Lee of the Island. Avalon itself is then protected.
We left Avalon late that Friday day, for the around an hour twenty minutes trip up the coast of Catalina (at around 14-15knots). Overnight on Friday in Two Harbors, we were still getting some light rain into Saturday. But as Saturday wore on, seas calmed down and by late afternoon we were drying out under clearing skies. By evening, life was blessed and we gave thanks and headed in for a few drinks ashore. That's when the standard flow of the Alaskan Tidal Currents (down through the Channel Islands) takes over as a storm hits land mass in Mexico and breaks up. The prevailing winds from the West/Northwest along with it's swells, knocks down any remaining swells from the storm, on the protected side in the Island's Lee. Those tidal currents are what carried her body south along the Island, through the some 220+ moorings in Two Harbors and into that cove. (note: that you would now have higher swells out in the Channel itself. Don't believe me..... Research it! ....it may have been rougher down in Avalon, but I highly doubt it. It was a cold and clear night with stars in the sky and no light from the moon. Pitch blackness everywhere except by the boats and some lights on the Island!
BTW... there are ways to get the exact reported conditions for Two Harbors that night. Remember winds and sea swells are reported as from which direction they are coming from. Now if you want to ask any more lame questions, let me know!
List of boats possibly there that night, included Invader, Prowler, Serendipity and some 10 or so others (some were from Marina Del Rey, besides Splendor).
|
|
gonefishing (Login diaryofafisherman) | hey Vampira!!!!!!!!!!!!!No score for this post | May 21 2010, 11:44 AM |
From Simone on the RJ LIST>>>And they leave filthy, obscene comments on my blog, but hey it only takes a
tenth of a second to delete. Guess they have nothing better to do but if you
see the "death board," that explains a lot.
Sure thing Simone! You said it was Creed on imdb. and I guess you have nothing better to do but read the posts on here and report back to your little wrinle bags. I guess its better than you and your buddy on imdb telling each other to check pm ten times a day and then deleting the posts.
I love you guys! All these posts about this board is dead and nothing but trolls and cess pools and all your crap but you all read every word and report back to each other like the freaking gestapo!
lololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol |
|
Pat and Larry (Login PatandLarry) | Former RJ fans.No score for this post | May 21 2010, 3:32 PM |
I am not afraid of anyone and that includes the RJ fan base which I was a part of at one time. My husband and I were big fans of RJ's but not anymore! The book Goodbye Natalie Goodbye Splendour may not be a piece of literature but it certainly makes sense to us. The time lines, the weather, the argument. It seems the only people disputing it are the die hard RJ fans. Why hasn't he stepped forward? What is he hiding? If this book is wrong why hasn't he said so? Why hasn't he sued the authors?We believe this book because it was published in RObert Wagner's life time not after he has passed over.
We read his book Pieces Of My Heart. How many sides does this guy have to his mouth?
I am also not afraid to sign our names,
Patrizia and Larry |
|
vladisjocko (Login vladisjocko) | Re: Rough Waters? lol.... You're hilarious!No score for this post | May 22 2010, 7:38 AM |
mustang sally
you are a complete and total liar i must say you have a great imagination and good writing skills maybe you should write a book AH HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH |
|
Lola (Login Lola6) | Re: Rough Waters? lol.... You're hilarious!No score for this post | May 22 2010, 7:47 AM |
and you should check into your local mental health facility. No time to waste! |
|
vladisjocko (Login vladisjocko) | Re: Rough Waters? lol.... You're hilarious!No score for this post | May 22 2010, 8:54 AM |
lola the only fix i need is you lets meet in rio we will smoke cigarettes and drink coffee
ah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah |
|
gonefishing (Login diaryofafisherman) | Re: Rough Waters? lol.... You're hilarious!No score for this post | May 22 2010, 9:24 AM |
jack azz. if you are going to impersonate someone get it right azz wipe.
Freaking obsessed over all this. You are one sick f****r!
So hows the weather where you are? Summer finally get there? |
|
somer43783 (Login somer43783) | Re: Rough Waters? lol.... You're hilarious!No score for this post | May 22 2010, 9:45 AM |
Let me get this correct, if you are Vlad and you are admitting that you are Jocko who was previously Halrego then are you admitting to RVendetti also? |
|
vj (Login vladisjocko) | got fish?No score for this post | May 22 2010, 11:52 AM |
you tell me who i am dumb azzs rofl lolololololol suckers rofl lololololol iwill sue you lololol rj is gay lolololloololol kate wagner is a plastic surgeons dream lololololol |
|
goneTROLL fishin (Login diaryofafisherman) | Re: got fish?No score for this post | May 22 2010, 12:28 PM |
got fish? Only nasty rotten fish is between your loins and its sticking up the world wide web again
ROFL
You retarded muther flipper! ROFL Its all part of the internet troll game. Who gives a ratz azz who the fluck you are.
Dumb retarded azz licker. ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
You play right into it and keep it going everywhere so I guess this board and all the rest aint dead yet.
right crotch sniffer?
lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololollolololololololololololololololololSUCKITolololololololololololololololololololololol
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahEATMEhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahha |
|
Moosetang (Login MustangXX) | Nadas Post in Menu is BB Malware, Don't Click It!No score for this post | May 22 2010, 8:28 PM |
I saw these two trolls on another site. One is called jock itch and the other... jock bitcchhh (they're married). But... I'm so glad to see there are no trolls here, though!  DD ....oh if you have an iPhone, you can get iTROLL Blocker. There's an App for PC's too. It's called.... S'MORES IGNORES (the more you ignore them the less they visit)! ....they actually provide some great free entertainment, though. I love Trolls myself... so just calm down!
Relax!!! You could take a trip to Catalina. Go ashore in an isolated cove and take a relaxing nap. But... watch out. You are bound to be awoken by a native Troll.... in the wilds of Catalina. Trolls could be Buffalos, Goats, Boars or other wild beasts. If you feel a rough tongue licking your face.... then it is most likely a goat. Hear snorting and bellowing in your face? Then you better run fast to the shore and get in the water. It's most likely a rogue buffalo looking for salt on your face to lick too! :D ...like most trolls they are really harmless and if you IGNORE them, they usually find something of more interest fairly quick. The aggressive ones, like big wild boar will scatter with a quick kick to the nuts or head and I'm not kidding about this part! haha.... what's cool about this technique, is when you kick them in the nuts, they can no longer reproduce and they are for sure going to stay clear of you next time!  So... just love your Trolls.... Because they really hate it when you do that.. most! ^_^ |
|
PatandLarry (Login PatandLarry) | Re: Rough Waters? lol.... You're hilarious!No score for this post | May 23 2010, 2:12 PM |
Pari exact ca cineva din grupul de RJ de ani în urmă.
You seemed to be trouble back then and I guess you are still up to your shady tricks.
How ridiculous this all is. The sea was calm the night Natalie Wood died.
Patrizia and Larry |
|
Rides jocko like a Donkey! (Login MustangXX) | @PatandLarry No problem!No score for this post | May 23 2010, 6:17 PM |
Don't worry.... I'm trying to gather the official reports generated from the weather that was at the Isthmus that night. Weather for the mainland, both North and Southern end of Catalina can vary greatly. I suspect some of these bogus reports come from different days or locations. The Coast Guard too has logs. The search craft has logs. Two Harbors Yacht Club has Logs as well (Meteorological Reporting Station is at Two Harbors). If you have all these logs supporting many witnesses on the scene saying it was calm..... it was calm for sure!
Think about it.... the controversy isn't new. Some didn't believe the mis-information in the first place. Since then Chris Walken convicts himself by his silence. When he never revealed the full details of his argument with RJ and the other two there have since admited a bottle of wine was smashed exploding glass everywhere around the table RJ broke it on. They have pictures of the stateroom. It was a mess! ...the dingy was double tied to stern off two stainless steel cleats on the fishing cockpit rail, not the swim step. So why would she even need to go on the swim step? You only tie to stern in calm water, without any swells coming from stern to bow toward the shore. Otherwise the dingy is in danger of going under the swim step (with pitch instead of swell) and getting caught and damaged. Any yachtsmen knows this!
The only time you would tie a dingy to port is when swells are coming from the starboard side to use the Yacht for protection in extreme seas cases and then the boat is rolling while the dingy never bumps into the Yacht. Moorings are laid out to keep boats from rolling in normal high swell conditions naturally bow in to shore. Under certain conditions they can't be avoided though. That's what happened in Avalon. Swells were coming in from the south and you'll get roll rather than pitch on mooring with swell coming in from the side or ricocheting and causing turbulent and confused seas. If seas were rough and since the storm was from the south (Mexico), even up in two harbors, you would have tied the dingy to starboard, if you were any kind of seaman at all.... and starboard is the dominant side boats and ships of all sizes use to board on gangways, etc. Primarily because of both Inland and Offshore waterway Rules declare starboard as "Right of way". You pass to the right of the center waterway buoys and dock to the right just as you park to the right, on streets.
Why did RJ allow himself to slip up and allow claims of calm seas make his two different scenarios impossible to validate. If Natalie left to go party on other boats (and he's such a jealous idiot), why would she go in rough seas? When she was deathly afraid of dark sea water as it was. Here's the killer fact; If the same currents and swell that was supposedly causing the boat to bang into the port side of Splendor, were the same rough swells and currents carrying the dingy and her body into a cove, how is that even possible? It's NOT! .....his story defies the physics of the natural world! |
|
gonefishin (Login diaryofafisherman) | poor old JockoNo score for this post | May 24 2010, 12:40 PM |
Hey mustang I guess you rode the donkey JOCKORVENDETTI all the way to imdb cuz he is trolling on there now. Doing the Simone shuffle with Vlad check your pm routine!
Poor old Jocko I guess even his good friend Sandy and her buddys on the RJ LIST are staying away from him to.
Hey harbeat when you read this Im still wondering about the group Sandy talked about and Im waiting for my invite. ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL |
|
PatandLarry (Login PatandLarry) | Re: poor old JockoNo score for this post | May 24 2010, 3:08 PM |
We saw that also but he deleted it. Can we assume that the response on there is yours?
We are aware that you aren't a fan of some of the people on the RJ group and neither are we but we find it hard to believe that any of them would go along with all this craziness from the Vlad or Jocko people.
Patrizia and Larry |
|
gonefishin (Login diaryofafisherman) | Re: poor old JockoNo score for this post | May 24 2010, 5:36 PM |
ROFL I see they still have you suckered in just like they suckered some people on this board in. They dont agree with them but they talk nice to them cuz they are women. Who cares? Like they care about you or anybody but old RJ. They rip everybody to pieces who doesnt kiss RJs wrinkled azz. Why are you off the group anyway? What happened? Did you say RJ cut the cheeze or didnt look 20 and they got offended? LOL They threw people off there for not posting. Called them lurkers. Hell people were afraid to post. People who never said a word or caused any problems got the boot but I sat there for years. So did the biggest b***h on the internet. I still sit there and so does she but she dont know I know its her. LOL
Now they are forming a new group and I still aint got my invite yet!
Anybody in the new group reading this and wants to tell me whats going on just send me a pm at imdb.
Maybe my invite got lost in the mail?
lolololololololololololololololololololololololol | |
|
| Current Topic - Marti Rulli Challenges the Authorities. |
|
|