|
New bookJune 1 2012 at 8:18 PM No score for this post | Anonymous (no login) |
| By Richard Gregson ..... |
|
| Author | Reply |
Anonymous (no login) | Re: New bookNo score for this post | June 1 2012, 8:50 PM |
He expresses himself with such warmth and depth of feeling. His memories of Natalie's death make Wagner's remembrance in Pieces of My Heart seem so cold, so self absorbed, like it was all about him. This book should put the troll's "RJ adopted Natasha" fable to sleep. We've been trying to tell him but he wants it to be true so he lives in a fantasy just as he does with just about everything discussed here. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: New bookNo score for this post | June 2 2012, 4:05 AM |
Yeah, Gregson was a real warm guy. He was doing Natalie's secretary--right under Natalie's nose. He had real warmth.
|
|
didnotfallofftheboat (no login) | Re: New bookNo score for this post | June 2 2012, 5:57 AM |
Hey stupid. Just because a person did a bad thing does not make them a bad person. Gregson admits his fault which is a ******** lot deeper and manly than your drunken wimpy boy has ever done.
Whats wrong? You got that adoption theory shoved down your throat so you got nothing better to say?
Why not get together with that UK troll and trash Lana some more. That always seems to work for you 2 degenerates. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: New bookNo score for this post | June 2 2012, 6:06 AM |
He is just pissed because every time the press writes about Natasha or Courtney or Lana they always put Natalie Wood in there as daughter of ICONIC screen star Natalie Wood or the sister of LEGENDARY actress Natalie Wood and barely mention that old stinky feet TV actor.
Natalie's detractors can say anything they want about her but it is just to sooth their own hateful jealousy. Let them talk all they want. The facts are the facts no matter how much they hate to admit it. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: New bookNo score for this post | June 2 2012, 8:31 AM |
WTF are you talking about? Does anyone on this site--forget it, I know the answer. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: New bookNo score for this post | June 2 2012, 9:44 AM |
Wagner did his butler right under Natalie's nose. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 11:43 AM |
wagner haters glorifying gregson what's next wagner haters glorifying wagner? the bad husband and absent father in all ways gets the glory, the good husband and father gets the guff. typical thoughts of women who are in or had a bad first marriage. gregson pulled alot of crap on wood that goes beyond porking his secretary. gregson knew what he was doing when he cheated, understand that. he also knew that wood had always been and still was in love with wagner. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 1:54 PM |
You keep telling yourself that BS and pretty soon you'll believe it. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 2:06 PM |
believing and fact are two different things, it's fact. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 2:05 PM |
Glorifying Gregson? Hardly. Are you that paranoid and insecure about Wagner that a positive comment about Gregson intimidates you to such a degree that have to insult Gregson? It seems that the only way you can build up old RJ is to debase someone else. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 2:53 PM |
Tell us the crap Gregson pulled on Natalie. Show us the links. Give us concrete proof or go back to your confessional with Father Slap and Tckle.
Gregson was absent because Natalie wanted her daughters here in the USA and raised together. Gregson agreed. He could have fought the Will but he honored his ex wife's wishes. What the **** more do you want from the guy? Wagner was the absent one. He was off diddling St John while the Nanny raised those 2 kids and we all know that is true. Why is it true? Because he admitted it in that book Eyeman wrote and Wagner attached his name to. I don't think Natalie had that in mind when she had her Will drawn but once again the Wagnutz can't stand to see their hairy back sloth toe drunk with dirt on himself. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 3:26 PM |
What a slime Gregon is. He screws around on Natalie right in her own house, and with her secretary. After they just had a baby together. Unbelievable that people could defend a man like that. Wood was right for throwing him out. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 3:42 PM |
Wagner was a slime screwing around with the butler in their own home while Natalie was asleep. It must be true because Wagner with his big, bad legal team did not sue. The troll makes old RJ out to be so tough that no one wants to cross him and his big, bad legal team. No one sued Suzanne Finstad so it must have been true. How sleezy can one be to screw around with the household staff while the wife was asleep. Compared to RJ, Gregson was a prince. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 3:52 PM |
It must be true because he didn't sue? Real brains on this site. Typical Enquirer reader. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 4:02 PM |
Well, the Wagner loving troll always makes a point of saying that we need to watch what we say because RJ and his legal team will come after us. According to the troll no one messes with RJ. If anyone is a typical Enquirer reader it is the troll who tries to make old RJ out to be someone we should fear as he will legally retaliate if this path is crossed. It's absolutely ridiculous as is most of what the troll types. Apparently, Suzanne Finstad had no fear of legal retaliation because she knew that Wagner would never sue. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 3 2012, 5:10 AM |
That is ridiculous. Why would he go after one or two little people like you or me or even this forum and not massive publications like the tabloids both in the USA and Europe?
Can you see us all in court? A bunch of nobodies getting sued by the Son of Hollywood! Wouldn't the tabloids have a field day with that one?
Then would he finally sue them too? |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 3:54 PM |
Both men have good and bad things on their ledger but I think I can break the tie. Gregson didn't kill her so he wins. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 5:07 PM |
Wagner killed his wife? I guess he was arrested for that, right? |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 5:28 PM |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 2 2012, 10:22 PM |
The boat Captain said, so it must be true. LOL. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 3 2012, 9:33 AM |
once again you're mixing fact with fiction, but, what could anyone expect. gregson more or less abandoned natasha, as a father and financially, you don't know what you're talking about because of your malice towards wagner. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 3 2012, 9:39 AM |
LMAO, yeah, OK, whatever you say in your little I wove Wobert Wagner fantasy world. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 3 2012, 11:38 AM |
it hs nothing to do with wagner, for you it has everything to do with wagner. your obsession and malice with wagner is what seperates your fantasy from reality. wood in her own words said she never stopped loving wagner even when she was with gregson and that the ending of the first marriage was a mistake and they could have worked things out. now, call wood a liar. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 3 2012, 11:49 AM |
LMAO. you mentioned Wagner, I responded. If it has nothing to do with him, why did you mention name? You seem to have difficulty separating fantasy from reality as you are bringing up something totally different than what you originally said. We were not talking about who loved who. You make up stories and manipulate the words that people speak to suit your own warped agenda. You're a nut! LOL |
|
Vindicator (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 3 2012, 5:57 PM |
I read New Book in the subject and thought this thread was going to be about that closet case Gay dude Tom Mankiewicz who had his bio come out posthumously. I just finished it on Kindle. Somebody I know ordered it so I read theirs. Thank God! I would be so pissed if I paid for this love letter to Robert Wagner. It screams secret love on every page and if Mankiewicz thinks he was throwing people off his Gay Gene by saying he never had an affair with Natalie Wood because of what it would have done to their friendship he really was stretching that one. That guy was uglier than Mart Crowley and I'm sure Natalie knew he was a poofter. All this old Gay guys who were part of the movie industry trying to act like they are straight and nobody knows. Funny stuff! |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 3 2012, 6:39 PM |
Wagner beat Natalie unmercifully and then tossed her limp body over the side of the boat. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 3 2012, 8:45 PM |
That sounds like the troll trying to stir the pot. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 12:04 AM |
"That sounds like the troll trying to stir the pot."
You better believe it and it's only gonna get worse biotch!
Wagner is a murderer. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 6:11 AM |
She should have stayed with Gregson, she would be alive today. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 6:38 AM |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 7:31 AM |
She should have kicked them all to the curve and dated the man she secretly had coffee with in Rio many years ago. He would have loved her forever. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 9:55 AM |
I guess sign in Lee and KitKat must be vacationing together. How is that visual for your next nightmare? |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 11:24 AM |
gregson praises wagner in his book. he should after all he dumped his daughter on him physically, emotionally and financially. What a man. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 11:30 AM |
Does KitKat "swish her tail" also? |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 11:54 AM |
From what I've heard old RJ has swished his tail. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 11:52 AM |
"dumped his daughter" typical troll remark to build up old Wagpie. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 12:00 PM |
Wood discovers Gregson is having an affair just 2 years after they were married. Some 10 months after the birth of their first child. Chances are pretty good that Gregson was fooling around on Natalie with other women...while Natalie was pregnant.
No way that marriage could have lasted. He was a real great guy, NOT!
|
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 12:06 PM |
At least she lived to tell about it. Wagner didn't give her that chance. He made sure she'd be silent. Why do you feel the need to trash Gregson? In your warped, shallow mind trashing Gregson makes old Wagpie look good? How desperate you sound. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 11:59 AM |
Wagner uses Natasha. I'm sure he's very grateful that Gregson "dumped" her on him. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 12:19 PM |
Robert Wagner killed Natalie? I don't think so. Natalie had an accident. Quite a different thing from being killed by your husband.
|
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 12:42 PM |
Natalie had an accident? I don't think so. We all know Wagner purposely delayed help to ensure that Natalie would perish. Quite a difference from accident. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 12:46 PM |
In Gregson's book there is a wonderful picture of him with Natasha. She was 17 in the photo, visiting him at his home in Wales. She looked like Natalie in this particular photo. She and her father are obviously close and loving. Also mentioned in the book was how dearly Gregson's kids from his previous marriage loved Natalie. Their relationship with her lasted until her death. Gregson spoke well of everyone in his book. He was discreet about private matters. He did not violate Natalie's privacy nor did he violate the privacy of her children. He did not boast and brag about his sexual endeavors. Obviously he is secure in his masculinity. he did not have the need to advertise who, when, why and how it went. Certainly, he was not without fault and did not profess to be but his memoir exposed a discreet gentleman. He could have used his relationship with Natalie to make his memoir more exciting, more tantalizing but instead he took the high road and for that I give him credit. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 1:20 PM |
Wagner beat Natalie unmercifully and then tossed her limp body over the side of the boat. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 1:46 PM |
His book is so opposite from the one Wagner wrote. Apparently, he didn't feel the need to make grand brags (lies) at the expense of dead celebrities. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 1:50 PM |
also, Gregson did not require a ghost writer to research his life. Why would anyone need someone to research his own life? Makes you wonder, doesn't it? |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 2:02 PM |
Why would anyone need someone to research his own life?
Because it's hard to keep track of all the lies Wagner has told in his life. It's nice to have someone look back and document them for him so he can appear consistent or spin things as suits his fancy. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 2:54 PM |
Well, they failed miserably as most of the lies were easy to spot unless the reader did not choose to recognize the lies told by Wagner and Eyman. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 3:39 PM |
Having fun talking to yourself today chowda head? now, cook dinner do the dishes finish your housewife chores and obsess over Wood. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 3:46 PM |
Because you respond, endlessly, to yourself you assume everyone else does. You are all alone in your warped little world of make believe. Go home little man. BYE! |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 3:53 PM |
Wrong again horse breath now go back to your Catholic Church on your knees with Padre Slap and Tickle. Howz the tan doing? |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 3:56 PM |
I guess we irritated him, when he is annoyed and irritated he feels the need to retaliate with empty insults. That's how children behave in the the school yard. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 4:56 PM |
Ha, ha, Gregson is garbage. The man thought so much of Natalie and their daughter that he was doing Natalie's secretary. The guy is garbage. Get real, people.
|
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 6:42 PM |
"ha ha, Gregson is garbage."
Wagner did his butler while Natalie was in the house. At least Gregson does not live a lie and try to sell himself as something he is not. At least Gregson did not share intimate, private details to make his book more exciting. At least Gregson did not tell stories about his sexual escapades with women who are dead and can't speak for themselves. Seems to me Mr. Wagner is closer to the trash heap than Gregson. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 8:49 PM |
i see your done with your chores and now your obsessing about wood, degrading wagner, and even picking on natasha's new born daughter. i have one word for you, karma, and it's coming for YOU |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 9:19 PM |
Karma is too good for that bitch I just sent the slander about natasha and her child to the right people I can't wait for the day when Wagner's lawyers get their hands on her, it will be better than the Salem Witch Trials. You've gone too far this time **** slander a child? you just lit the fuse. HOW DARE YOU YOU SICK DOB |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 5 2012, 6:11 AM |
That was you who slandered Natasha's child. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 5 2012, 6:45 AM |
Only Jocko, the sick demented troll, would slander an innocent baby and turn something wonderful into another opportunity to troll and slander and lie. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 5 2012, 9:37 AM |
Sure thing Dweeb. RJ's lawyers are going after all the little people. Why doesn't he sure all the major tabloids? They have called him a murderer, an alcoholic, a jealous drunk. Seems like he would have a better shot at sueing them than a bunch of little nobodies who voice their opinion just like you do!!!
Come on Team Wagner. Tell us why and make it a good one you worthless hypocrite. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | ARE YOU THREATENING PEOPLE AGAIN?No score for this post | June 5 2012, 9:32 AM |
THREATS! MORE THREATS! ARE YOU THREATENING PEOPLE AGAIN? Be sure! Be very sure exactly who you are accusing of saying what and about whom because the statements you are making can come back and bite you in the *** if they are proven untrue and I can assure you that they are untrue. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | June 4 2012, 9:21 PM |
"Wagner did his butler while Natalie was in the house. At least Gregson does not live a lie and try to sell himself as something he is not. At least Gregson did not share intimate, private details to make his book more exciting. At least Gregson did not tell stories about his sexual escapades with women who are dead and can't speak for themselves. Seems to me Mr. Wagner is closer to the trash heap than Gregson"
Cuckoo!!! |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | July 2 2012, 3:18 PM |
Wagner is and always will be trash. His narcissism easily explains how he could have pushed her in, then waited for her to exhaust & become overwhelmed by cold & then float astray. The fundamental flaw that people make when assessing his behavior is that he is someone that exists within normal parameters. There is nothing normal about Wagner. He is an actor, ofc he lied and cheated and charmed his way out of it. Natalie was always the underdog–abused and used and doing whatever needed to be done according to the agenda of someone else. That's why Wagner flipped out on Walken. She was his puppet, and after making through everything that had happened up to the re-marraige, he went into a jealous rage (as with Beatty) to learn that she was falling for someone younger and more popular and sleeping with him as well. Old war wounds came back to haunt him and he finally had enough. He wanted out b/c in his opinion, how dare she need anyone but him, He's Robert Wagner, 2nd only to Monroe in fan mail 25 yrs prior. The only actor i've even seen be praised for facial expressions. lol its the same stupid look all the time every day & the ladies just love it for some reason.
kk ladies, you can have him!! But don't cheat on him, you may find yourself screaming for your life with only him around to save you!!!
Not a murderer my ***. "My wife fell into the cold, dark ocean & she can't swim, and is terrified! Don't turn the search lights on, or call for immediate help, or start screaming at the top of your lungs to try and locate her, CALL MY LAWYER INSTEAD!!!!" |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | July 2 2012, 5:43 PM |
Again, claim your dumazz posts, Don. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | July 2 2012, 8:33 PM |
Refer to the "I just read this on imdb!" thread.
|
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | July 7 2012, 11:48 PM |
I love how you two are arguing about two guys so passionatly that were around years before either of you were probably in your mothers wombs. |
|
not don, again (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | July 8 2012, 3:23 PM |
This guy accuses people of being whoever this jacko guy is with complete conviction. I'm just letting him know that he's a moron. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | July 8 2012, 3:25 PM |
and that's Jocko trying to take the scent of him, the stench. |
|
Anonymous (no login) | Re: classof74No score for this post | July 8 2012, 3:43 PM |
like I said, simply an idiot who has jacko fever lol
u realize how he/she/it/jack has gotten under your skin? If someone in real life says, "Natalie had numerous affairs,," to you at work (kind of a reach, more like at the institution,) do you jump out at them and say, "jacko!!"
lol moron | |
|
|
|