Buy/Sell/Trade Area Home Collector Links
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

PSA grading inconsistencies

August 19 2007 at 9:25 AM

  (Login GillesRen)

Just a little heads-up on grading disparities from PSA.

The ugliest PSA 10 I've ever seen on EBAY. Isn't PSA 10 suppose to
be the perfect card. The OPC rough-cut, a lightly blurr face, the double
black line on the bottom right just to list the obvious and some
probabilities of surface defects that we can't see on the scan!!!

http://cgi.ebay.ca/1972-OPC-324-ALAIN-CARON-PSA-10-NORDIQUES_W0QQitemZ110158001511QQihZ001QQcategoryZ16313QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

IMO, it would have made a nice PSA 8.

For the ugliest PSA 9, I have it! And what a deception it was when I received it.

Any bad luck with graded cards, anyone?



P.S.: I bought my first two 54' Topps PSA 8 two weeks ago. It is true, these cards are nice
looking, but I'm personally more attracted by the little 51' and 52' sketched cards.

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - PSA grading inconsistencies  Respond to this message   
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index