or is it me???

http://cgi.ebay.ca/1963-parkhurst-77-Frank-Mahovlich-psa-9_W0QQitemZ360199895089QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUS_Hockey_Trading_Cards?hash=item53dd963831

Corners look soft to me. And I won't talk about the white borders, lol!

Will it cross over.....?!

As you can see, this card was graded in the past 18 months max. It s obviously not a Mint card as scan shows very well. A 7 at best. I had a parkhurst 54-55 psa 6 that was graded several years ago, a very Nice card. I ve craked the case and send it back. Got a 7.5 this time...The thing is that some people keep buying the slab more than the card itself... Since PSA decide to go for the half grade system, they are clearly much smoother and generous on the vast majority of the grade they give. If you want to know if the card was graded before the Half grade system, just look at the sticker-tag that identify the card in the PSA slab. If the number is under the grade allowed, and not on the same line, card was graded under the new system.

Yeah! No doubts it would cross over a 7, lol!

it makes me wonder what the hell PSA is doing !
under grades - over grades - half grades - grades with qualifiers - inconsistent grading,just getting tired of there B.S.
what will they think of next to keep people coming back for more !
maybe in a few years they will put a number out of a hundred like SGC does. LOL
sometimes i wonder if they give a damn about the hobby !
they should be ashamed of themselves as it is getting pretty clear that they just want to soak every penny out of every card they grade by letting collectors re-grade over and over again to make more money.
in my opinion SGC is the way to go at least this company is consistent !!!

how does it compare to my PSA 8.5 ?
[IMG][/IMG][IMG][/IMG]