<
 


  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  

Bruce Le's view on chi

August 1 2005 at 4:46 PM
 

 
I would like to ask you - JKD experts about Bruce Lee's view on chi and chi cultivation exercises. I have recently visited a website of a Taiji and Shaolin master, he comments that JKD is good for fighting but not for health. JKD solely relies on physical strength not chi which is vital to strengthen internal organs. This is because the founder Bruce had limited knowledge of chi, thus underestimated chi and chi cultivation exercises.
Thank you for your attention and look forwards to your reply.

 
 Respond to this message   
AuthorReply
Anonymous

Re: Bruce Le's view on chi

August 1 2005, 10:17 PM 

I READ SOMEWHERE THAT THE EDITOR OF BLACK BELT SAID BRUCE LEE HAD THE MOST POWERFUL CHI OF ANY ONE HAD MET, EXCEPT FOR ONE AIKIDO GUY ( TOHEI OR SOMETHING). ALSO READ SOMEWHERE THAT BRUCE LEE THAT CHI STUFF WAS HOCUS-POCUS,BALONEY ETC.

 
 Respond to this message   
Ironfist87

Chi is a joke, and Bruce was onto it.

March 23 2009, 11:01 PM 

Chi is not something Lee ever thought much of. It was hocus pocus and remains hocus pocus. Lee also was an athiest. So I am guessing he didn't think a hell of a lot about the supersticious mystery power martial artist of his day. nor should we.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: Bruce Le's view on chi

August 3 2005, 7:01 PM 

so what is the true thing about Bruce Lee on chi ?

 
 Respond to this message   
tig

Re: Bruce Le's view on chi

September 8 2005, 8:01 PM 

Okay, first of all, in Chinese martial arts, it's Ki.

 
 Respond to this message   
duong huy

Re: Bruce Le's view on chi

September 28 2005, 7:18 PM 

but many people (including chinese masters) said that massive musle like Bruce blocks chi.Thus, they concluded that tremendous power that Bruce produced solely came from physical thing (speed, musle, timing..) not chi. What is your comment ?

 
 Respond to this message   

Re: Bruce Le's view on chi

October 24 2005, 9:09 AM 

Ok first of all it cud b chi, ki, or however u want 2 describe it. N bruce was very well knowledged on chi da reason dey he wasn't is because his style is still not liked becuz it broke a cycle of learnin trade set moves n all he did was simplify movements n created new 1's dat they didn't agree wit n still dont agree wit. But in his style he also told his students 2 go on learnin moves dat benefit dem not just keep following wat he taught over n over but 2 evolve as a person n martial artist. But sifu lee had good knowledge of chi otherwise sum of da moves wudn't have as much power as they do.

 
 Respond to this message   

why dont we just admit it?

October 25 2005, 8:28 AM 

okay... ifrst of all, i dont see why we need to play words games so as to not offend anyone. bruce lee was one of the best. he was, like they said, a shooting star in martials arts that suddenly went out. nobody wants to be bested, especially masters of the arts themselves. of course theyre gonna say that he didnt have this or didnt have that and the only reason he was so good was this and this. swallow your pride a**holes! i have no problem saying he was much better than i am and that he was much better than i may ever be. you could say that muscle blocks chi, but that is to say that if you workout at all you reduce your abilities in that field. which most masters would be quick to disagree with. or you could say that muscle conducts it, it which case many more would agree because of the amount of muscle they have obtained.
in my personal opinion, he was the one who devoted 100% of his energy into building his physical and metaphysical self and nobody has done so since. he was the best because he devoted so much of himself to it. anybody else who devoted only of piece of themselves to it and then amkes excuses as to why they are not as good can kiss my ass!
stop making excuses and try harder!

 
 Respond to this message   
Duong Huy

asking more

November 18 2005, 12:12 AM 

OK, I am not JKD guy, however, I am fan of Bruce Lee and interested in arts. In my opinion, what some taichi or shaolin master talked about Lee is not completly unconvincing. In fact, Bruce died young while taichi masters practice chikung and are often long-lived. It is said reliably that Bruce used drug and electric machines during the end of his life and though this migh help fighting skill it harm the health especially in terms of estern point of view on health. What do you think ? There is any misuderstanding about Bruce here? Could you prove it ?

 
 Respond to this message   
EGG SHIN

Re: asking more

November 18 2005, 11:07 PM 

HELLO, I bought one of those machines (electrical stimulators). I guess it works I did not use it very long though (couple of days). It takes about 6 weeks to develope muscle. The machines regular persons buy are not as strong as as the type a Doctor would sell with a prescription which is used for "rehab". This machine which cost 500.00 dollars is more powerful then the type you put on your gut as (seen on t.v.). my brother got one when he hurt himself and it worked for him when he was unable to walk but works the muscle by tenseing over and over until it gets worked If you have the time and money it could work for you.

 
 Respond to this message   
Alex

Brue chi

January 7 2006, 10:39 AM 

Bruce's friends such as Taky Kimura and Kareen Abduhl Jabaar, have quoted That bruce has commented on Chi (chinese) Ki (japanese), Just read "the warrior within" by john little. Bruce viewed it as Source of energy but not to the extent of blocking bullets ect which he though was ballony. Those Chi masters saying Bruce's huge muscles blocked the chi were just the soft chi masters haveing an argument with the hard chi masters which held the oppasite view. When Did bruce ever have Huge muscles? Bruce's muscles werent big like a bodly builders and if you look at bruces Training mathods u can see he went to great lengths in order to prevent him devloping huge muscles, bruces msucles were dense, toned effiecnt muscles, whereas bodybuilders have show muscles which is not very effiecnt. And its tense muscle that blocks Chi, you could have huge muscles but aslong as you keep them relaxed they dont block chi. I think bruce viewed Chi as more of a metaphore, as he sometimes refered to it as mental energy, and will power, and talks of it in terms of physics and "moments" in the body. Bruce was highly scientific in his approach to martial arts, although he did talk about the tien tan (where the chi is stored about 2" below your navel, which is also the cneter of gravity"

 
 Respond to this message   
superwazn

muscle blocks qi

February 8 2006, 1:09 AM 

muscle does not block qi, a tense or flexed muscle does. flexing the muscle will restrict qi flow and "limit" your power. that is why in tai ji chuan you need to be relaxed and move as though you are not actually using muscles

 
 Respond to this message   

Re: Bruce Le's view on chi

January 15 2006, 3:20 PM 

no, idiot, in chinese martial arts it is called qi. its has been accepted in the west as "chi". The japanese transliteration renders "ki". so before you try to speak down to others in a matter-of-fact way, take an i.q. test first.

 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: Bruce Le's view on chi

January 18 2006, 5:40 PM 

I have read som pages from the book on Bruce by M. Uehara -a friend of Bruce. He said Bruce refered to chi of ki as "flowing energy". Bruce did not like other master considering chi as a mysterious stuff. To Bruce, chi is just a form of energy. But I still wonder then how bruce developed his chi,if he pay attention to chi enough. Why did it seem that Bruce did not live a healthy life (in the final period of his life), i.e, using drugs...? Is there any guy can help answer my question ?

 
 Respond to this message   
kevin

Re: Bruce Le's view on chi

February 9 2006, 7:41 PM 

tig, no in japanese its ki in chinese its chi.

 
 Respond to this message   

Get out of your fantasy worlds >.>

March 2 2006, 7:09 PM 

Bruce Lee took a more scientific approach to developing power. He was also very into rationality and efficiency, so I don't think he would be too interested in wasting long hours trying to develop chi when he could use proven methods to develop power.

 
 Respond to this message   
duonghuy

please read this interesting excerpt ! and what do you think ?

March 5 2006, 4:02 PM 

Here is an interesting excerpt from Web site of and well known taichi and shaolin kung fu:

Question 8
Given Bruce Lee's perception of non traditional martial arts, and you being a practitioner of wushu which is considered a "traditional" form of martial arts, what do you have to say in regard to Jeet Kune Do, which primarily takes after elements of Boxing and Kickboxing; Their fundamentals you state are incorrect ways to go around sparring such as full contact sparring.


Answer 8
Today, the term "wushu" when used in English generally refers to a modernized form of external kungfu for demonstration, devoid of internal force and combat application. Therefore, I would say that I practiced traditional kungfu, and not wushu, although "wushu" in Chinese means kungfu.

I am not oppose to full contact free sparring by itself, but strongly object to subjecting students to such sparring without sufficient preparation. It is inevitable that the students will hurt themselves both physically and psychologically.

Full contact free sparring is actually an important part of kungfu combat training, but it is done after sufficient preparation, and it usually comes at the end of a long combat training programme.

Surprising it may sound to some people, injuries seldom occur in our full contact free sparring. This is due to two main reasons. By then the sparring partners are so well trained that they can effectively defend against random full contact attacks. This in fact is the aim of sparring.

Secondly, should one fails to defend himself, his sparring partner will hold back the power of his strike. This may be difficult in Jeet Kwon Do and other external martial arts because power depends on speed, leaving the attacker little or no time to pull back. But it is not difficult in kungfu where power depends on relaxation and energy flow, and where power can be released at the point of contact.

Many kungfu practitioners, including masters, loudly claim that Bruce Lee practiced kungfu, and they took great pride in Bruce Lee defeating many masters of non-Chinese martial arts. These kungfu practitioners were so inadequate in combat and their moral so low that Bruce Lee's success was a great psychological boost to them. Rightly or wrongly, they would point to Bruce Lee and proclaim, "Look, how great is our Chinese kungfu; it can defeat martial art masters of so many other styles!"

But the fact is that Bruce Lee's Jeet Kwon Do is not kungfu. No matter from what perspective you view it, Jeet Kwon Do is very different from kungfu. Jeet Kwon Do's philosophy, forms and methodology are so vastly different from those of kungfu. The sad fact is that most kungfu practitioners today know little or not at all about kungfu philosophy and methodology.

If they knew, kungfu would not be in such a deplorable state it is in today. Had Bruce Lee known about kungfu philosophy and methodology, and valued them, he would not have invented Jeet Kwon Do, and he would not have died so young. For example, kungfu philosophy places health before combat, but Bruce Lee sacrificed health for combat. Kungfu methodology emphasizes gradual progress, but Bruce Lee forced his progress by mechanical and even chemical means.

Kungfu practitioners today know a lot about kungfu forms. They mistake kungfu forms for the whole of kungfu. Even if we take forms as a criterion, Jeet Kwon Do is so different from kungfu.

Now be prepared for something that may sound unpleasant. In kungfu philosophy, Jeet Kwon Do is considered a third class martial art. (You may take consolation in the fact that according to kungfu philosophy, what most kungfu practitioners today practice is not martial art, not even the lowest class.) This does not mean Jeet Kwon Do is not combat effective, otherwise Bruce Lee would not have been such a formidable fighter.

Martial arts can be classified into three classes. The lowest class of martial arts merely concern themselves to fighting, often to the detriment of health. Second class martial arts are effective for fighting as well as contribute to health and longevity. The highest class of martial arts are effective for fighting, contribute to health and longevity, and cultivate the spirit, leading to the highest achievement any being can attain.

Even if we just consider combat efficiency alone, Jeet Kwon Do is far less sophisticated than kungfu. Then, why did Bruce Lee defeat so many kungfu masters? There were two main reasons. One, Bruce Lee was extremely skillful, which was more important in combat than technical sophistication. Although his techniques were simple, he was so fast and powerful that it would be difficult to match him. The second reason was that the kungfu masters Bruce Lee defeated were not combat efficient. They could also be defeated by lesser fighters than Bruce Lee, like ordinary Black Belts, wrestlers and street fighters.

Then why do I say that Jeet Kwon Do is less sophisticated than kungfu in combat? Here are some of the reasons. Jeet Kwon Do, like many other martial arts, is incomplete. For example, if an opponent locks the kicking leg of a Jeet Kwon Do exponent, or moves in to fell him onto the ground, the Jeet Kwon Do exponent may not have any techniques from his art to counter.

On the other hand, a kungfu exponent not only has a rich repertoire of counters, a skillful exponent may purposely let his opponent lock his leg or fell him so that he could release his counters surprisingly. Because Jeet Kwon Do relies on mechanical strength, a practitioner would be limited by his size, age and sex. A kungfu exponent has no such limitations because he depends on internal force.

A Jeet Kwon Do exponent would be panting for breath after sparring for about 15 minutes, but a kungfu exponent can spar for hours without being out of breath. A Jeet Kwon Do exponent loses energy in his sparring, and the way he spars causes energy blockage, whereas a kungfu exponent has more energy at the end of his sparring, the process of which can clear energy blockage!

It needs to be pointed out here I am speaking about a high level kungfu exponent. Most kungfu practitioners would not be able to accomplish what has been described above; some may not even believe such feats are possible.

For more detail pls log on Question 8
Given Bruce Lee's perception of non traditional martial arts, and you being a practitioner of wushu which is considered a "traditional" form of martial arts, what do you have to say in regard to Jeet Kune Do, which primarily takes after elements of Boxing and Kickboxing; Their fundamentals you state are incorrect ways to go around sparring such as full contact sparring.


Answer 8
Today, the term "wushu" when used in English generally refers to a modernized form of external kungfu for demonstration, devoid of internal force and combat application. Therefore, I would say that I practiced traditional kungfu, and not wushu, although "wushu" in Chinese means kungfu.

I am not oppose to full contact free sparring by itself, but strongly object to subjecting students to such sparring without sufficient preparation. It is inevitable that the students will hurt themselves both physically and psychologically.

Full contact free sparring is actually an important part of kungfu combat training, but it is done after sufficient preparation, and it usually comes at the end of a long combat training programme.

Surprising it may sound to some people, injuries seldom occur in our full contact free sparring. This is due to two main reasons. By then the sparring partners are so well trained that they can effectively defend against random full contact attacks. This in fact is the aim of sparring.

Secondly, should one fails to defend himself, his sparring partner will hold back the power of his strike. This may be difficult in Jeet Kwon Do and other external martial arts because power depends on speed, leaving the attacker little or no time to pull back. But it is not difficult in kungfu where power depends on relaxation and energy flow, and where power can be released at the point of contact.

Many kungfu practitioners, including masters, loudly claim that Bruce Lee practiced kungfu, and they took great pride in Bruce Lee defeating many masters of non-Chinese martial arts. These kungfu practitioners were so inadequate in combat and their moral so low that Bruce Lee's success was a great psychological boost to them. Rightly or wrongly, they would point to Bruce Lee and proclaim, "Look, how great is our Chinese kungfu; it can defeat martial art masters of so many other styles!"

But the fact is that Bruce Lee's Jeet Kwon Do is not kungfu. No matter from what perspective you view it, Jeet Kwon Do is very different from kungfu. Jeet Kwon Do's philosophy, forms and methodology are so vastly different from those of kungfu. The sad fact is that most kungfu practitioners today know little or not at all about kungfu philosophy and methodology.

If they knew, kungfu would not be in such a deplorable state it is in today. Had Bruce Lee known about kungfu philosophy and methodology, and valued them, he would not have invented Jeet Kwon Do, and he would not have died so young. For example, kungfu philosophy places health before combat, but Bruce Lee sacrificed health for combat. Kungfu methodology emphasizes gradual progress, but Bruce Lee forced his progress by mechanical and even chemical means.

Kungfu practitioners today know a lot about kungfu forms. They mistake kungfu forms for the whole of kungfu. Even if we take forms as a criterion, Jeet Kwon Do is so different from kungfu.

Now be prepared for something that may sound unpleasant. In kungfu philosophy, Jeet Kwon Do is considered a third class martial art. (You may take consolation in the fact that according to kungfu philosophy, what most kungfu practitioners today practice is not martial art, not even the lowest class.) This does not mean Jeet Kwon Do is not combat effective, otherwise Bruce Lee would not have been such a formidable fighter.

Martial arts can be classified into three classes. The lowest class of martial arts merely concern themselves to fighting, often to the detriment of health. Second class martial arts are effective for fighting as well as contribute to health and longevity. The highest class of martial arts are effective for fighting, contribute to health and longevity, and cultivate the spirit, leading to the highest achievement any being can attain.

Even if we just consider combat efficiency alone, Jeet Kwon Do is far less sophisticated than kungfu. Then, why did Bruce Lee defeat so many kungfu masters? There were two main reasons. One, Bruce Lee was extremely skillful, which was more important in combat than technical sophistication. Although his techniques were simple, he was so fast and powerful that it would be difficult to match him. The second reason was that the kungfu masters Bruce Lee defeated were not combat efficient. They could also be defeated by lesser fighters than Bruce Lee, like ordinary Black Belts, wrestlers and street fighters.

Then why do I say that Jeet Kwon Do is less sophisticated than kungfu in combat? Here are some of the reasons. Jeet Kwon Do, like many other martial arts, is incomplete. For example, if an opponent locks the kicking leg of a Jeet Kwon Do exponent, or moves in to fell him onto the ground, the Jeet Kwon Do exponent may not have any techniques from his art to counter.

On the other hand, a kungfu exponent not only has a rich repertoire of counters, a skillful exponent may purposely let his opponent lock his leg or fell him so that he could release his counters surprisingly. Because Jeet Kwon Do relies on mechanical strength, a practitioner would be limited by his size, age and sex. A kungfu exponent has no such limitations because he depends on internal force.

A Jeet Kwon Do exponent would be panting for breath after sparring for about 15 minutes, but a kungfu exponent can spar for hours without being out of breath. A Jeet Kwon Do exponent loses energy in his sparring, and the way he spars causes energy blockage, whereas a kungfu exponent has more energy at the end of his sparring, the process of which can clear energy blockage!

It needs to be pointed out here I am speaking about a high level kungfu exponent. Most kungfu practitioners would not be able to accomplish what has been described above; some may not even believe such feats are possible.

Question 8
Given Bruce Lee's perception of non traditional martial arts, and you being a practitioner of wushu which is considered a "traditional" form of martial arts, what do you have to say in regard to Jeet Kune Do, which primarily takes after elements of Boxing and Kickboxing; Their fundamentals you state are incorrect ways to go around sparring such as full contact sparring.


Answer 8
Today, the term "wushu" when used in English generally refers to a modernized form of external kungfu for demonstration, devoid of internal force and combat application. Therefore, I would say that I practiced traditional kungfu, and not wushu, although "wushu" in Chinese means kungfu.

I am not oppose to full contact free sparring by itself, but strongly object to subjecting students to such sparring without sufficient preparation. It is inevitable that the students will hurt themselves both physically and psychologically.

Full contact free sparring is actually an important part of kungfu combat training, but it is done after sufficient preparation, and it usually comes at the end of a long combat training programme.

Surprising it may sound to some people, injuries seldom occur in our full contact free sparring. This is due to two main reasons. By then the sparring partners are so well trained that they can effectively defend against random full contact attacks. This in fact is the aim of sparring.

Secondly, should one fails to defend himself, his sparring partner will hold back the power of his strike. This may be difficult in Jeet Kwon Do and other external martial arts because power depends on speed, leaving the attacker little or no time to pull back. But it is not difficult in kungfu where power depends on relaxation and energy flow, and where power can be released at the point of contact.

Many kungfu practitioners, including masters, loudly claim that Bruce Lee practiced kungfu, and they took great pride in Bruce Lee defeating many masters of non-Chinese martial arts. These kungfu practitioners were so inadequate in combat and their moral so low that Bruce Lee's success was a great psychological boost to them. Rightly or wrongly, they would point to Bruce Lee and proclaim, "Look, how great is our Chinese kungfu; it can defeat martial art masters of so many other styles!"

But the fact is that Bruce Lee's Jeet Kwon Do is not kungfu. No matter from what perspective you view it, Jeet Kwon Do is very different from kungfu. Jeet Kwon Do's philosophy, forms and methodology are so vastly different from those of kungfu. The sad fact is that most kungfu practitioners today know little or not at all about kungfu philosophy and methodology.

If they knew, kungfu would not be in such a deplorable state it is in today. Had Bruce Lee known about kungfu philosophy and methodology, and valued them, he would not have invented Jeet Kwon Do, and he would not have died so young. For example, kungfu philosophy places health before combat, but Bruce Lee sacrificed health for combat. Kungfu methodology emphasizes gradual progress, but Bruce Lee forced his progress by mechanical and even chemical means.

Kungfu practitioners today know a lot about kungfu forms. They mistake kungfu forms for the whole of kungfu. Even if we take forms as a criterion, Jeet Kwon Do is so different from kungfu.

Now be prepared for something that may sound unpleasant. In kungfu philosophy, Jeet Kwon Do is considered a third class martial art. (You may take consolation in the fact that according to kungfu philosophy, what most kungfu practitioners today practice is not martial art, not even the lowest class.) This does not mean Jeet Kwon Do is not combat effective, otherwise Bruce Lee would not have been such a formidable fighter.

Martial arts can be classified into three classes. The lowest class of martial arts merely concern themselves to fighting, often to the detriment of health. Second class martial arts are effective for fighting as well as contribute to health and longevity. The highest class of martial arts are effective for fighting, contribute to health and longevity, and cultivate the spirit, leading to the highest achievement any being can attain.

Even if we just consider combat efficiency alone, Jeet Kwon Do is far less sophisticated than kungfu. Then, why did Bruce Lee defeat so many kungfu masters? There were two main reasons. One, Bruce Lee was extremely skillful, which was more important in combat than technical sophistication. Although his techniques were simple, he was so fast and powerful that it would be difficult to match him. The second reason was that the kungfu masters Bruce Lee defeated were not combat efficient. They could also be defeated by lesser fighters than Bruce Lee, like ordinary Black Belts, wrestlers and street fighters.

Then why do I say that Jeet Kwon Do is less sophisticated than kungfu in combat? Here are some of the reasons. Jeet Kwon Do, like many other martial arts, is incomplete. For example, if an opponent locks the kicking leg of a Jeet Kwon Do exponent, or moves in to fell him onto the ground, the Jeet Kwon Do exponent may not have any techniques from his art to counter.

On the other hand, a kungfu exponent not only has a rich repertoire of counters, a skillful exponent may purposely let his opponent lock his leg or fell him so that he could release his counters surprisingly. Because Jeet Kwon Do relies on mechanical strength, a practitioner would be limited by his size, age and sex. A kungfu exponent has no such limitations because he depends on internal force.

A Jeet Kwon Do exponent would be panting for breath after sparring for about 15 minutes, but a kungfu exponent can spar for hours without being out of breath. A Jeet Kwon Do exponent loses energy in his sparring, and the way he spars causes energy blockage, whereas a kungfu exponent has more energy at the end of his sparring, the process of which can clear energy blockage!

It needs to be pointed out here I am speaking about a high level kungfu exponent. Most kungfu practitioners would not be able to accomplish what has been described above; some may not even believe such feats are possible.

fore more detail, please log on to :http://wongkk.com/answers/ans06a/jan06-3.html


 
 Respond to this message   
WONG LOW

Re: please read this interesting excerpt ! and what do you think ?

March 11 2006, 1:53 AM 

YOU ARE WEIRD AS IN YOU ARE ONE STRANGE LITTLE CREATURE

 
 Respond to this message   
Mike

CHI

March 11 2006, 6:42 PM 

You have some points which i agree, but in my opinion Bruce developed JKD to get to the essence of what all martial arts are about, combat. The point being that if one isn't successful in combat, there is no tommorrow. Everyone trains for different reasons.

 
 Respond to this message   
duonghuy

Jeetkunedo and Kung fu

March 13 2006, 3:40 PM 

From this exerpt, I see that it indicated that Jeetkunedo lost a precious stuff - inner energy. Not like many of you, i think chi or inner energy is real, it is proved by chi kung exercises however, inner energy can only be applied in combat at advanced level and only for those training under qualified teachers.Interestingly, inner energy development is highly linked to spritual development which is the untimate goal for any serious martial art practioners.

To my understanding, JKD just focuses on things it consider practical in combat such as fitness, speed, timing....I do not mean that defense is not of any importance in MA but if once you do not pay attention to spritual development you never reach the depth of MA.


 
 Respond to this message   
chris

that's a poor article

June 27 2006, 3:37 PM 

My point is mainly against the argument that after 15 mins of sparring a JKD practitioner would be exhausted and that an interal kung fu style practitioner could go on for hours. Most fights last a few mins not a few hours or even 15 mins.

I would like to refute the point that a JKD practitioner is limited to age, sex and size. JKD is a flexible style that encourages cross training, the use of all techniques that work, and finding the best way for you. This means that not only would a person have unlimited techniques, but these techniques can be used in various ways.

I'd also like to point out that in a fight if you don't protect yourself your opponent won't let up on a kick, making it pointless for a sparring partner to let up on a kick.

Sorry about jumping around so much.

 
 Respond to this message   
yomomma

chi is bullcrap

April 18 2007, 2:17 AM 

chi are ki is bullcrap focus your training on technics and physics

 
 Respond to this message   
Alex

Re chi is bull crap

May 30 2007, 4:03 PM 

Muscles do not block chi because ...... Chi does not exist. Although some benifit can be gained by using chi like more powerful strikes, its all psychological, because you believe you can hit harder you do. I study both jkd and hypnosis, and i use chi in my training but it dont for one second think its real, its just a way of getting the most out of your body through visulisation. You do feel stronger, like there is an energy flowing through your body but its all psychological. Now I doubt that Bruce realised this, and he was wise enough to know you can't gain superhuman abilities with it, I think he did belive in chi, ans Taky Kimura, Kareem Abdul Jabar and others have quoted him talkin about it.

 
 Respond to this message   
Zhimar

"Superhuman"

June 3 2007, 12:36 AM 

Re chi is bull crap

"Muscles do not block chi because ...... Chi does not exist. Although some benifit can be gained by using chi like more powerful strikes, its all psychological, because you believe you can hit harder you do. I study both jkd and hypnosis, and i use chi in my training but it dont for one second think its real, its just a way of getting the most out of your body through visulisation. You do feel stronger, like there is an energy flowing through your body but its all psychological. Now I doubt that Bruce realised this, and he was wise enough to know you can't gain superhuman abilities with it, I think he did belive in chi, ans Taky Kimura, Kareem Abdul Jabar and others have quoted him talkin about it."

------------------
Response:

"benefit can be gained by using chi like more powerful strikes" "its just a way of getting the most out of your body". "like there is an energy flowing through your body".

"you can't gain superhuman abilities with it,"

Unless "Superhuman" is defined (as in martial arts) as abilities exceeding normal human standards (the key word is normal).

When "Superhuman" is popularly defined (as in entertainment) meaning something which is "superior" exceeding maximum human standards (the key word is maximum). By this definition "you can't gain superhuman abilities with (chi) it,"


 
 Respond to this message   
Anonymous

Re: "Superhuman"

October 6 2007, 6:29 PM 

chi is real! is the source of vital interal energy.

Chi can be applied for health and medical treatment, it is quite common! I think chi is applicable to martial art too. though not easy

 
 Respond to this message   

CHI

November 6 2007, 6:50 AM 


I am not fully convienced of "chi" as being something super human, but I believe it can be translated to will power. The more will you have to power yourself through work out, combat, work, etc. The better you feel about yourself in the end. If this equals flowing chi that you notice then you have to call that feeling something.


Going back to they days when people were young in civilization they had to learn and explain things that they do not understand. CHI could be one of those things. My 2 cent on that sub.


___________

JKD is modern MA more then MA its MMA. Bruce Lee has taken what he has learn from various styles of MA combined them and made Jeet Kune Do. Simple and effective where application is key. If you never apply what you learn you will never know what you learned.




 
 Respond to this message   

Re: CHI

January 31 2008, 9:00 PM 

I have done martial arts for many years, about 14 to be more exact. In that time I have believed, read, subscribed and thought over most ideas that I have come across.

I consider chi to be an archaic idea that blocks true progress in martial arts and combat. Does chi exist? Does a soul exist? Or how about a god? Will we ever, really know? Who can say? However, martial arts and combat, JKD, is about you. It's about discovering yourself, and truly expressing who you are, not just in martial arts but in every aspect of your life.

Whatever you believe, if it gets in the way then perhaps you should reconsider your ideology. Life, like JKD, is a process and is not a product.

Peace.

Troy D. Schott
Jeet Kune Do Full Instructor
ISSA Certified Fitness Trainer

 
 Respond to this message   
Current Topic - Bruce Le's view on chi
  << Previous Topic | Next Topic >>Return to Index  
Create your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2009 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement