News | Summit Trip Reports | Partners | Low Point Reports | Dogs
Summary Topics: E-News Archive | Club News | Accidents | Obituaries | Books | Advisories | Site News

 Go to Forum Home  

Re: "Alternate" highpoint for IL

April 19 2006 at 2:52 PM
Not Who You Think It Is  (Login devnull1)

Response to "Alternate" highpoint for IL



Since we are in the process of repeatedly pummeling deceased equines, ...

>There are 6 places where alternates would apply:
> ...
>Wash.DC: hp=429'; Washington Monument Observation deck:515' (86' >difference)

I would respectfully disagree with you on this one.

The top of the Washington Monument is 555 feet (and change, but close enough). It sits on a small knoll of between 30 and 40 feet of elevation. Taking the most generous measurement, the top of the monument is 595 feet from mean sea level or 166 feet higher than Reno Reservoir.

However, the top of the Washington National Cathedral, while it is only 301 feet high, sits at an elevation of slightly greater than 377 feet (based at the BM at the corner of Wisconsin and Massachusetts Aves). Thus, the highest point is (being most conservative), is 671 feet or 242 higher than the HP.

>IL & DC are measurements to the observation deck.

I measured from the top. If you want to claim the highest point, you have to go to the highest point!

 Respond to this message   
Find more forums on Mountain RangesCreate your own forum at Network54
 Copyright © 1999-2018 Network54. All rights reserved.   Terms of Use   Privacy Statement  
RSS Feed For This Forum
Privacy Statement | Network54 Terms and Conditions